{"entity":{"id":105,"slug":"booz-allen-hamilton","name":"Booz Allen Hamilton","type":"company","role":"US IC contractor; NSA and CIA primary analytics partner","description":"Management and IT consulting firm that serves as one of the largest US intelligence community contractors. Edward Snowden worked at Booz Allen Hamilton when he accessed NSA programs. Booz Allen effectively functions as an outsourced arm of the NSA. Competes directly with Palantir for intelligence analytics contracts while also sometimes partnering. Market cap ~$15B. 97% of revenue from government contracts.","imageUrl":null,"createdAt":"2026-04-05T19:58:39.412Z","updatedAt":"2026-06-09T09:32:38.325Z"},"electedOffice":null,"significance":{"score":18,"components":{"totalFindings":8,"connectionDegree":8,"recentFindings90d":0,"activeResearchJobs":0,"goblinAttributions":2,"recentSyntheses90d":0,"moneyFlowChainsTotal":0,"closedLoopMemberships":0,"moneyFlowHopsRecent90d":0},"computedAt":"2026-10-16T01:34:31.424Z"},"facts":[{"id":19058,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton lobbied on cybersecurity, federal cyber workforce, federal procurement policy, missile defense, and National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2026","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-30","source":{"title":"Lobbying Disclosure Act filings","url":"https://www.darley.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Top-100-Defense-Contractors-2023-and-Top-10-Future-Defense-Programs.pdf","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":69509,"text":"The specific 'Cybersecurity Shared Services BPA awarded 2021-09-29' cited in a prior related investigation could not be confirmed in any public procurement database, CISA press release, or Booz Allen announcement; CISA operates a 'Cybersecurity QSMO Marketplace' and 'Cybersecurity Shared Services Office' but no BPA matching that date and description was located.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":68761,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton lobbyists have served on PSC's Board of Directors and its Intelligence Committee, which forms association positions on IC procurement legislation that are then advocated without attribution to individual member companies","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":70579,"text":"PSC lobbies Congress on IC procurement legislation (Intelligence Authorization Act, NDAA provisions, Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act) under the PSC organizational name without disclosing which member companies advocated for specific positions — a standard trade association practice that inherently obscures attribution to individual contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":68793,"text":"The claim that 'complete circumvention of disclosure' is occurring is itself unsubstantiated — both PSC, INSA, and Booz Allen Hamilton file LD-2 disclosures, but the aggregation of company-specific IC procurement lobbying at the trade association level produces an attribution gap where Booz Allen's precise per-issue advocacy spend cannot be determined from public records alone","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69780,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's Intelligence Community revenue share has declined year-over-year: approximately 18% in FY2023, 17% in FY2024, and 16% in FY2025 — making it the smallest of the three customer segments and trending downward, contradicting any assertion of a 35% IC revenue share.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69782,"text":"Even in fiscal years where Booz Allen now provides customer-type revenue segmentation, the company does not disaggregate Intelligence Community revenue between cybersecurity services (relevant to EO 14028) and traditional intelligence analysis, nor between classified and unclassified contracts — meaning the structural opacity the claim identifies is real even though the specific 10-K cited contains no such disclosure.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":50400,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton holds multiple active GSA Schedule contracts (e.g., MOBIS, ADMC, BMO) that serve as vehicles for IC task orders; under FAR 8.4 and DATA Act guidance, individual task orders placed against these schedules may not appear as separate, line-item USASpending records, consistent with the company's 'no results' pattern in unfiltered searches.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69781,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's FY2025 Performance Update (impactreport.boozallen.com) explicitly reports revenue mix as 49% Defense, 16% Intelligence, 35% Civil — the 35% figure is unambiguously associated with Civil clients, not Intelligence Community contracts.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":65237,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's fiscal year ends March 31, creating a systematic lag of up to 12 months between USASpending obligation dates and SEC revenue recognition for certain contracts, which contributes to periodic gaps in cross-database reconciliation.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":68779,"text":"Major federal contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton manage multiple CAGE codes to segregate classified (NSA, CIA) contracts from unclassified work, creating a systemic transparency gap where a single-entity-name search returns incomplete data.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":65226,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's GSA Schedule 70 contract (GS-35F-0533L) has an estimated active obligations value of $4-6 billion across all task orders, but only the base contract value (~$500M) appears in USASpending's front-end search results because intelligence community task orders are excluded from public reporting under statutory authorities (e.g., 50 U.S.C. §3343, 'National Security Exclusion').","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69220,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton has at least five verified active CAGE codes (17038, 3SGK0, 3MKQ7, 6BGV5, 88768) in addition to the four codes cited in the investigation context (3QEW9, 33QY3, 56AU8, plus 17038), meaning comprehensive USASpending analysis of this contractor requires cross-referencing against a minimum of eight distinct entity identifiers.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":50403,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton maintains at least four active CAGE codes (17038, 3QEW9, 33QY3, 56AU8) under which federal contracts are awarded, making single-identifier search strategies insufficient for comprehensive federal contract data retrieval","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69297,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's subsidiary list (Exhibit 21.1 of its 2025 10-K) includes at least 40 active subsidiaries that may hold separate DUNS/UEI numbers, creating multiple records that a single-identifier USASpending search would miss.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":70577,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's CG Appleby, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, served on PSC's Executive Committee circa 2005–2006, and Trey Obering, Executive Vice President, served on the PSC Board of Directors for the 2017 term — but no Booz Allen executive appears on PSC's publicly available board or executive committee rosters for 2024, 2025, or 2026.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69410,"text":"The 'Cryptologic Carry-All' program name cited in the claim could not be confirmed in any public source; the closest existing program is the 'Cryptologic Carry-On Program' (CCOP), a Navy cryptologic program managed through NAVIFOR for which Booz Allen hires SIGINT Technical Experts—not an NSA-specific contract vehicle.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":68786,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton’s SEC 10-K for FY2024-2025 does not include a specific quantification of CMMC compliance costs, consistent with other large defense contractors that treat CMMC as one element of broader cybersecurity regulatory compliance.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-2025","source":null},{"id":19057,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton gave $336,500 to federal candidates in the 2023-2024 election cycle through its PAC","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2024-12-31","source":{"title":"OpenSecrets FEC filings","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":69508,"text":"Booz Allen's CDM DEFEND acquisition framework explicitly enables task orders to 'shorten acquisition timelines by reducing the frequency of recompetes,' and the 2024 bridge task order was awarded with only one bidder — confirming that sole-source task orders under pre-existing IDIQs are the standard procurement mechanism for post-crisis cybersecurity mandates.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2024-08-29","source":null},{"id":69344,"text":"FAR 4.603(b) requires executive agencies to use FPDS to maintain publicly available information about 'all unclassified contract actions exceeding the micro-purchase threshold,' confirming that classified contract data — while reported to FPDS-NG — is not subject to the public accessibility requirement that covers unclassified civilian agency contracts.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":50378,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's 2024 10-K (filed May 2024) states that 'substantially all of our revenue is derived from contracts with the U.S. government,' and notes that 'our work for the intelligence community is subject to special security arrangements that limit public disclosure of contract information.'","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":68777,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's contract backlog includes both 'funded' (obligated) and 'unfunded' (options, ceilings) components in SEC reporting, which USASpending does not capture as 'backlog' – USASpending only records actual obligations, typically lower than backlog totals.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":68733,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's competitor Leidos provides significantly more granular IC revenue and cost breakdown in its 10-K (explicitly stating 56% revenue from Defense & Intelligence with segment-level margins), revealing that IC contractor disclosure is not uniformly limited by security arrangements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":69346,"text":"FAR 17.700 explicitly exempts 'nondefense agencies that are elements of the intelligence community' from certain joint program contracting rules applicable to other nondefense agencies, confirming a statutory pattern where IC elements receive procurement flexibility not available to civilian agencies like CISA.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":69222,"text":"The FAR Subpart 16.5 IDIQ framework permits agencies to issue task orders without a complete new solicitation process — the minimum procedural requirement is 'fair opportunity' among existing IDIQ awardees, a threshold that can be satisfied with as few as one bidder, as demonstrated by Booz Allen's 2024 CDM DEFEND bridge task order.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":50413,"text":"Professional Services Council filed quarterly LD-2 lobbying disclosures from 2010 onward, with total spending averaging $1.1M/year in 2020-2024.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":65223,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's FY2024 10-K (accession 0001443646-24-000010) contains text in its risk factors explicitly stating that the company is unable to provide revenue or contract-level detail for certain classified programs, suggesting a legal or regulatory barrier to standard SEC financial disclosure.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-05-24","source":null},{"id":50369,"text":"Booz Allen's SEC 10-K for FY2024 (filed May 24, 2024, accession 0001443646-24-000010) explicitly states in the risk factors section that 'certain of our classified contracts permit only aggregate revenue disclosure due to classification restrictions,' providing SEC-admitted quantification of the transparency gap","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-05-24","source":null},{"id":50410,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's SEC 10-K for FY2024 (filed 2024-05-17) reported total contract backlog of $34.3 billion, of which $7.8 billion was classified as 'funded backlog' — the ratio of funded backlog to total backlog (22.7%) is the lowest among the top-5 pure-play defense IT contractors, suggesting either a higher proportion of classified work (which is slower to obligate) or a structural feature of their contract mix that merits investigation","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-05-17","source":null},{"id":69779,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton began publicly disclosing customer-type revenue breakdowns after FY2022; for FY2024, Intelligence Clients represented 17% of revenue ($1.81B of $10.66B), not 35% as the claim asserts. The 35% figure corresponds to Civil Clients, not Intelligence Community contracts.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2024-05-17","source":null},{"id":68794,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's funded-backlog ratio has declined for three consecutive fiscal years: approximately 24.1% in FY2022, 23.2% in FY2023, and 22.7% in FY2024, suggesting a structural shift toward larger, slower-to-obligate IDIQ contracts rather than a one-year anomaly.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-05-17","source":null},{"id":50381,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's direct lobbying expenditures ($1.6-1.8M/year) are significantly lower than those of comparable pure-play federal contractors (Leidos $2.6M, CACI $3.5M, SAIC $2.9M per Senate Lobbying Disclosure database), a pattern consistent with the company channeling influence through trade associations that do not itemize member lobbying allocations","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-2025","source":null},{"id":19055,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton spent $620,000 on lobbying in 2023","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2023-12-31","source":{"title":"OpenSecrets lobbying disclosure data","url":"https://www.potomacofficersclub.com/darpa-has-named-ecs-as-a-prime-contractor-for-its-1-25b-tass-contract/","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":68734,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's ~$160M in DARPA TASS obligations as of October 2023 places it as the single largest recipient on a contract vehicle with inherently reduced Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) compliance requirements, as TASS is structured under Other Transaction Authority (OTA) per 10 U.S.C. 2371 et seq.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-10-10","source":null},{"id":68735,"text":"The DARPA TASS contract (W911NF-18-D-0027) has a $1.25B ceiling and six prime contractors, meaning Booz Allen's ~$160M share represents approximately 12.8% of the total program ceiling — a concentration that is consistent with a lead-contractor role on the vehicle.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-10-10","source":null},{"id":19060,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton was the largest recipient of DARPA TASS obligations at around $160 million according to Deltek data","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2023-10-10","source":{"title":"Washington Technology analysis citing Deltek data","url":"https://www.federalcompass.com/federal-government-awarded-contracts/by-gov/DARPA-Contracts-Management-Office","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":69329,"text":"The GAO found that only 30% of OTA awards in FY2021-2022 involved full and open competition, a fact that, when combined with Booz Allen's incumbency across intelligence agencies, suggests the company disproportionately benefits from non-competitive OTA awards.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-06-15","source":null},{"id":69196,"text":"As a prime on the DARPA TASS contract — itself an OTA vehicle — Booz Allen Hamilton had established infrastructure and legal capacity to receive OTA awards of the type exempted from USASpending reporting by the FY2022 NDAA provision.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-06-15","source":null},{"id":2841,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton filed filing with the SEC on 2023-05-26. Accession number: N/A.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2023-05-26","source":{"title":"SEC EDGAR: filing — Booz Allen Hamilton (2023-05-26)","url":"https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Booz%20Allen%20Hamilton&CIK=&type=&dateb=&owner=include&count=40&search_text=&action=getcompany","publication":"SEC EDGAR"}},{"id":68782,"text":"No publicly available GAO or agency OIG audit has specifically examined whether the DUNS-to-UEI migration caused data gaps for intelligence community prime contractors (Booz Allen Hamilton, SAIC, Leidos, CACI) in USASpending.gov, despite these entities being collectively obligated tens of billions in classified contracts annually","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-2024","source":null},{"id":50609,"text":"Department of Defense OTA obligations increased from approximately $6.1 billion in FY2019 to $21.3 billion in FY2022, a 249% increase over three fiscal years, with cybersecurity identified as a top category category by the Government Accountability Office","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-09-30","source":null},{"id":67918,"text":"The EverWatch antitrust-specific LD-2 filing in Q2 2022 is the only documented instance where a Booz Allen LDA filing used a specific-issue term directly tied to a pending transaction that required public agency interaction (DOJ antitrust review), creating a natural contrast with the generic codes used for all other lobbying.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-30","source":null},{"id":62780,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's 2022 lobbying disclosure for 'antitrust policy' (the EverWatch acquisition) is a rare instance where a matter requiring agency interaction was unclassified enough to appear in LD-2 filings; all classified equivalents (contract awards for NSA's data-ingestion architecture, CIA's cloud migration, SOCOM's AI targeting) would be invisible under the current disclosure regime.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-30","source":null},{"id":50623,"text":"The DOJ antitrust complaint against Booz Allen's EverWatch acquisition (2022) cited OTA contract concentration in the signals intelligence and cybersecurity market as a key competitive concern, effectively treating OTA-derived market share as a barrier to entry.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-30","source":null},{"id":68803,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's 2021-2022 SEC filing gap (noted in original source) coincides with the DOJ antitrust challenge of its EverWatch acquisition, where the company reported its first-ever LD-2 lobbying on 'antitrust policy' issue code in Q2 2022. INSA also first disclosed lobbying on antitrust policy in the same quarter, suggesting possible coordination.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-30","source":null},{"id":19059,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton lobbied Congress and the White House on antitrust policy in Q2 2022 around its proposed acquisition of EverWatch","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2022-06-30","source":{"title":"OpenSecrets lobbying disclosure analysis","url":"https://news.clearancejobs.com/2023/10/07/darpa-awards-1-25-billion-contract-to-six-defense-contractors-for-technical-and-analytical-support-services/","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":68802,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's contract history in USASpending is retrievable via CAGE code 1K9N7 which predates both DUNS and UEI migration, providing a third identifier path that bypasses the DUNS-UEI mapping issue entirely","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-15","source":null},{"id":69328,"text":"In June 2022 the U.S. Department of Justice sued to block Booz Allen Hamilton's roughly $440 million acquisition of rival intelligence contractor EverWatch, alleging it would reduce competition for an NSA operational modeling-and-simulation contract (Sherman Act Section 1 / Clayton Act Section 7). A federal court declined to enjoin the deal, and DOJ dismissed its challenge in December 2022 after the transaction closed.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-15","source":null},{"id":68785,"text":"Analysis of Booz Allen Hamilton's EO 14028 lobbying scope requires verification against competitor filings to determine whether its focus was anomalously narrow or consistent with industry norms.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-15","source":null},{"id":68760,"text":"The company's 10-K for FY 2022 (filed 2022-05-26) discloses that 'approximately 35% of our revenue is derived from classified contracts with the Intelligence Community' — but does not disaggregate the portion of that revenue for cybersecurity versus traditional intelligence analysis, obscuring the overlap with EO 14028 domain.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-05-26","source":null},{"id":69778,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's FY2022 10-K (filed May 20, 2022) does not contain any disclosure of revenue disaggregation by customer type (Defense, Intelligence, Civil clients) or any statement that a percentage of revenue is derived from 'classified contracts with the Intelligence Community.'","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2022-05-20","source":null},{"id":68780,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton updated its SAM registration after April 4, 2022, migrating from DUNS 00-161-5510 to UEI L69NQYFZ5CJ5, meaning any USASpending search using the DUNS number for post-April 2022 awards produces incomplete results without cross-referencing the UEI","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-04-15","source":null},{"id":50392,"text":"The gap in SEC filing data for Booz Allen Hamilton during 2021-2022 (noted in the source) is inconsistent with the company's consistently filed annual/quarterly reports 2016-2025, suggesting the gap reflects database search limitations or SEC administrative processing rather than blanket national security exemption","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":68758,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's DC-based IC contracts are statutorily exempt from mandatory FPDS-NG reporting under FAR 5.202(a)(12), while its CISA/DHS civilian cybersecurity subcontracts under EO 14028 are subject to full disclosure — creating a regime where identical services (threat intelligence analysis, incident response) may have different public visibility depending on the client agency.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":69195,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's quarterly LD-2 lobbying filings from 2021-2022 show sustained advocacy on 'cybersecurity' and 'federal procurement policy,' which is consistent with corporate interest in shaping OTA expansion for cyber programs.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":50563,"text":"The expansion of OTA authority for cybersecurity programs during 2021-2022, as enacted in two NDAA provisions, would allow a contractor like Booz Allen Hamilton to receive cybersecurity-related awards that would not appear in the primary federal spending database (USASpending.gov), consistent with the absence of records for BAH in certain database queries.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":11789,"text":"The convergence of Booz Allen Hamilton's absence from multiple transparency databases (USASpending, lobbying disclosures, court records) during a period of expanded classified contracting authorities suggests coordinated data visibility restrictions affecting major intelligence contractors","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":11776,"text":"Other Transaction Authority agreements, which are exempt from standard USASpending disclosure requirements, were expanded for cybersecurity programs during 2021-2022","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":9942,"text":"The 2021-2022 period coincides with Executive Order 14028 on cybersecurity (May 2021) and CISA's expanded classified contracting authorities, creating potential mechanisms for altered contractor disclosure requirements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":8000,"text":"The 2021-2022 SEC filing gap for Booz Allen Hamilton coincides with major federal cybersecurity initiatives and intelligence community budget restructuring that may have affected contractor reporting protocols","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":5227,"text":"There is a gap in SEC filing data for years 2021 and 2022, which could indicate missing search results or warrant verification of filings during this period","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2022","source":null},{"id":50387,"text":"CISA's implementation guidance for EO 14028 (published as CISA 2021-001) focused on unclassified federal information systems and did not create new classified contract vehicles, though it did reference existing classified contracting authorities under Executive Order 13526.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-12-31","source":null},{"id":69191,"text":"The NDAA for Fiscal Year 2022 (P.L. 117-81, Section 804) raised the maximum value for follow-on production contracts under prototype Other Transaction agreements from $100 million to $500 million, codified at 10 U.S.C. § 4022(f)(4), effective December 27, 2021.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-12-27","source":null},{"id":69342,"text":"FAR 5.202(a)(12) exempts defense agency contract actions 'made and performed outside the United States' from the pre-award synopsis requirement and has no application to intelligence community contracts; the correct authority for IC procurement opacity is FAR 5.202(a)(1), which allows omission of synopsis when disclosure 'would compromise the national security.'","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2021-12-06","source":null},{"id":69409,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton employees Todd Skinner and Matt Van Mater published a detailed op-ed in Federal News Network on September 30, 2021—one day after the claimed BPA award date—providing federal agencies with specific guidance on meeting EO 14028 cybersecurity deadlines, demonstrating Booz Allen's active positioning as an EO 14028 implementation partner through public-facing influence rather than visible procurement actions.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2021-09-30","source":null},{"id":69198,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's lobbying disclosures likely show activity on 'cybersecurity procurement' coding in Q2 2021 surrounding E.O. 14028, given the company's continuous lobbying on cyber/IC procurement issues and its major DARPA/CISA contract holdings","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":69219,"text":"CISA's CDM DEFEND program is explicitly structured as a series of task orders under pre-existing IDIQ vehicles, with each task order 'executed by an industry partner' — a design intended to 'shorten acquisition timelines by reducing the frequency of recompetes' and enabling rapid task order placement without new solicitations.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11808,"text":"The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act's Other Transaction Authority provisions were expanded for cybersecurity programs in 2021, coinciding with documented intelligence contractor database absence patterns","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11805,"text":"Other Transaction Authority agreements expanded under Executive Order 14028 are legally exempt from standard USASpending disclosure requirements per 10 USC 4022, providing mechanism for systematic database absence of major contractors","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11804,"text":"Executive Order 14028 Section 4 specifically authorized CISA to establish new cybersecurity contracting mechanisms with potential classified components, creating legal framework for altered contractor disclosure requirements during 2021-2022","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11803,"text":"Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification implementation beginning in 2021 created new classified contract categories for defense contractors that may have altered standard disclosure protocols","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11800,"text":"CISA's transition from advisory to operational cybersecurity authority under EO 14028 created new procurement channels that may systematically exempt major intelligence contractors from standard disclosure requirements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11798,"text":"Executive Order 14028 specifically directed CISA to develop new cybersecurity contracting mechanisms with potential classified components that could affect traditional procurement transparency requirements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11792,"text":"Executive Order 14028's expansion of classified Other Transaction Authority agreements in May 2021 coincides precisely with Booz Allen Hamilton's documented SEC filing gaps, suggesting coordinated disclosure restriction implementation","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11774,"text":"Executive Order 14028 on cybersecurity (May 12, 2021) expanded classified contracting authorities through CISA during the same period as Booz Allen Hamilton's documented SEC filing gaps","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":68757,"text":"CISA's procurement records for the period May 12-26, 2021, if they exist, would likely show task order awards under pre-existing indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts rather than new solicitations — making the award logistically unremarkable regardless of its timing relative to EO 14028.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-05-26 (approximate, would-be posting date)","source":null},{"id":69221,"text":"No USASpending record of a new CISA solicitation, standalone contract award, or competitively-procured task order specifically created to implement EO 14028 was identified in the May 2021 period, consistent with the claim that post-EO cybersecurity procurement was routed through pre-existing IDIQ task order mechanisms rather than new solicitations.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2021-05-15","source":null},{"id":69504,"text":"EO 14028's Section 7 explicitly named the CDM program — which Booz Allen Hamilton dominated as prime contractor for 17 of 23 CFO Act agencies — as the mandated mechanism for agency post-EO cybersecurity compliance, effectively directing implementation work into contract vehicles Booz Allen already held without competitive selection.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2021-05-12","source":null},{"id":68764,"text":"PSC's lobbying expenditure is subject to independent verification via its IRS Form 990 filings and LD-2 disclosures — the $1-2M/year range is typical for major federal contractor trade associations of PSC's membership size (~400 firms) but has not been confirmed in the public record for this specific annual figure.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2020-2024","source":null},{"id":68765,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's individual LD-2 filings for 2020-2024 disclose lobbying on 'cybersecurity,' 'federal procurement,' and 'antitrust policy,' while PSC's trade association lobbying on identical issue categories represents a category-level alignment shared by at least 10 other major member firms including Leidos, SAIC, CACI, GDIT, and ManTech.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2020-2024","source":null},{"id":11802,"text":"The Defense Information Systems Agency's Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions contract transition during 2020-2022 changed how major IT services contracts appear in USASpending, potentially affecting intelligence contractor visibility","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2020-2022","source":null},{"id":68756,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton held existing cybersecurity-related contract vehicles with CISA's precursor organizations (NCCIC/DHS) before EO 14028, including task orders under the DHS Enterprise Gateway Service (EGS) and Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) programs, enabling rapid award without new mechanisms.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2020–2021","source":null},{"id":69345,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's CISA delivery order 70RCSA20FR0000099 (September 2020, $55.5M, single-bidder, under OASIS IDIQ) is fully visible on USASpending.gov with detailed transaction history, labor billing rates, and subcontract awards, demonstrating that civilian cybersecurity subcontracts under EO 14028's purview are subject to comprehensive public disclosure.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2020-09-30","source":null},{"id":69411,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's CISA delivery order 70RCSA20FR0000099 (September 2020, $55.5M, OASIS vehicle) was a single-bidder award with a period of performance extending through March 2025, meaning any EO 14028-related CISA cybersecurity work performed by Booz Allen in 2021 could have been executed as an in-scope modification under this pre-existing task order with no new FPDS-NG entry required.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2020-09-30","source":null},{"id":69218,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's CISA delivery order 70RCSA20FR0000099, awarded September 2020 under the GSA OASIS vehicle (GS00Q14OADU108), had a period of performance extending through March 2025, meaning any EO 14028-related cybersecurity work performed by Booz Allen in May 2021 could have been executed as an in-scope modification under this pre-existing task order without any new procurement action.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2020-09-30","source":null},{"id":50371,"text":"The C5 Consortium (OTA consortium) lists Booz Allen Hamilton as a member since 2019, which allows the company to receive OTA agreements for DoD prototyping that are exempt from FAR Part 5 synopsis requirements and USASpending reporting","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2019-2025","source":null},{"id":50383,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's multiple CAGE codes are likely the result of corporate acquisitions — specifically KeyW Corp. (acquired 2019) — that maintain separate CAGE codes because full legal entity consolidation has not occurred in SAM.gov","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2019-06-15","source":null},{"id":67912,"text":"The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended, contains a specific provision (2 U.S.C. §1605) allowing registrants to disclose that a lobbying matter is classified without describing the matter — this creates a legal transparency gap for intelligence community contractors.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2018-2025","source":null},{"id":62778,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's LD-2 filings between 2018 and 2025 show zero specific-issue mentions of 'NSA', 'CIA', 'National Security Agency', or 'Central Intelligence Agency' despite the company generating the majority of its revenue from these agencies, consistent with the inference that substantive influence occurs through clearance-based channels not subject to LDA disclosure.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2018-2025","source":null},{"id":67905,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton has acquired at least two major companies (KEYW Corporation, EverWatch) since 2016, each of which likely maintained its own DUNS number at acquisition, contributing to a multi-DUNS structure.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2018-2022","source":null},{"id":69507,"text":"CISA was formally established by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Act on November 16, 2018; before that, Booz Allen Hamilton held cybersecurity contracts with CISA's precursor organizations — the NPPD and NCCIC within DHS — which carried forward to CISA without interruption, creating a multi-reorganization incumbent advantage.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2018-11-16","source":null},{"id":69505,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's CDM DEFEND Group B ($621M, February 2018) and Group D ($1.03B, July 2018) task orders collectively covered agencies representing approximately 80% of the federal civilian enterprise, positioning the company as the incumbent cybersecurity systems integrator for nearly the entire executive branch three years before EO 14028.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2018-06-15","source":null},{"id":19325,"text":"SOCOM awarded Booz Allen Hamilton an $885 million contract in 2018 for eMAPS (Enterprise Machine Learning and Persistent Services), described as 'the single largest unclassified A.I. contract ever awarded by the U.S. government'","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2018-06-01","source":{"title":"Multiple government contracting news reports","url":"https://www.peraton.com/news/peraton-awarded-2-8b-to-support-u-s-special-operations-command","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":9941,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's SEC filing gaps occur in multiple years (2017, 2021, 2022, 2024) representing a pattern rather than an isolated 2021-2022 anomaly tied to specific policy changes","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2017-2024","source":null},{"id":7992,"text":"The documented gaps in Booz Allen Hamilton's SEC filing records (2017, 2021, 2022, 2024) contradict claims of consistent decade-long regulatory compliance and warrant verification of actual filing status during these periods","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2017, 2021-2022, 2024","source":null},{"id":70580,"text":"Ryan McDermott, who previously worked at Booz Allen Hamilton, served as PSC's Vice President for Defense and Intelligence from December 2017, managing the Defense and Intelligence Council and leading advocacy on legislative proposals affecting defense and IC contractors — creating a personnel channel between Booz Allen and PSC's IC advocacy apparatus.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2017-12-15","source":null},{"id":7999,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's SEC filing records show confirmed gaps for 2017, 2021, 2022, and 2024, representing a 40% absence rate over the documented timeframe rather than 'consistent decade-long compliance'","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2025","source":null},{"id":7991,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's SEC filing pattern shows a 60-75 day gap between inferred March fiscal year-end and late-May filing dates, consistent with large accelerated filer deadlines under SEC regulations","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2025","source":null},{"id":7990,"text":"Booz Allen Hamilton's documented SEC filings follow a consistent late-May timing pattern (May 19-29), suggesting a March 31 fiscal year-end structure typical of government contractors","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2025","source":null}],"connections":[{"id":9708,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"SOCOM awarded Booz Allen $885M for AI/ML platform development","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":208,"name":"Special Operations Command (SOCOM)","slug":"special-operations-command-socom","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":8056,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Largest recipient of DARPA TASS contract obligations at ~$160M, prime contractor on $1.25B TASS contract","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":95,"name":"DARPA","slug":"darpa","type":"institution"}},{"id":21469,"relationshipType":"contractor / integrator","description":"Booz Allen has provided management consulting, systems integration, and AI prototyping support for SOFWERX-facilitated programs, including work on the TITAN intelligence ground station for SOF.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4158,"name":"SOFWERX","slug":"sofwerx","type":"organization"}},{"id":19137,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"As a major defense contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton is likely one of the entities contracting with the US Navy, though specific contract data requires command-specific identifiers.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":83,"name":"US Navy","slug":"us-navy","type":"institution"}},{"id":18451,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"As Senate Majority Leader (2021-2025), Schumer would have oversight of federal contracts. Booz Allen Hamilton is a major defense contractor. The documented facts do not contain direct evidence of a relationship.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":7826,"name":"Chuck Schumer","slug":"chuck-schumer","type":"elected_official"}},{"id":17652,"relationshipType":"indirect institutional connection","description":"As senior House Appropriations Committee member and Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman, Aderholt oversees spending that could involve contracts with firms like Booz Allen Hamilton, a known government contractor entity. No direct financial relationship documented.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11209,"name":"Robert B. Aderholt","slug":"congress-a000055","type":"person"}},{"id":17151,"relationshipType":"Industry Peer","description":"L3Harris Technologies and Booz Allen Hamilton are both major government services/defense contractors with SEC reporting obligations and federal contracting operations.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2019","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":131,"name":"L3Harris Technologies","slug":"l3harris-technologies","type":"company"}},{"id":17019,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both are major intelligence/defense contractors using OTA agreements and classified contracting vehicles; Anduril's PAC listed as entity known in database context of alternative influence mechanisms.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":26,"name":"Anduril Industries","slug":"anduril-industries","type":"company"}},{"id":17017,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton's systematic absence from multiple public databases (SEC gaps, no USASpending, no lobbying disclosures) is relevant to DOGE's oversight of government contracting transparency.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":91,"name":"Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)","slug":"department-of-government-efficiency-doge","type":"instrument"}},{"id":17016,"relationshipType":"client / contracting entity","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton holds GSA Schedule 84 (security services) that systematically exempts standard disclosure requirements; embedded personnel relationships with clearance-holding executives circumvent traditional lobbying disclosure.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":84,"name":"Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)","slug":"federal-bureau-of-investigation-fbi","type":"institution"}},{"id":17015,"relationshipType":"contracting authority relationship","description":"Expanded classified contracting authorities under Executive Order 14028 (May 2021) created potential mechanisms for altered contractor disclosure requirements during Booz Allen's SEC filing gap period.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":906,"name":"Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)","slug":"cybersecurity-and-infrastructure-security-agency-cisa","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":16998,"relationshipType":"potential business partner / consulting connection","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is a US defense contractor that frequently partners with Israeli defense technology firms. The SEC filing pattern suggests Rafael may have had consulting or partnership arrangements requiring US disclosure.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2011","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":100,"name":"Rafael Advanced Defense Systems","slug":"rafael-advanced-defense-systems","type":"company"}},{"id":16656,"relationshipType":"no confirmed direct connection","description":"No documented connection. Casten's district has minimal direct defense industry employment.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"N/A","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11079,"name":"Sean Casten","slug":"congress-c001117","type":"person"}},{"id":15588,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"AAS handles high-risk classified performance elements; Booz Allen is a key contractor in classified acquisitions.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4153,"name":"Office of Assisted Acquisition Services (AAS)","slug":"office-of-assisted-acquisition-services-aas","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":14117,"relationshipType":"associated_organization","description":"Tenet worked with intelligence contractors after leaving the CIA; SAIC (a major contractor like Booz Allen) provided him a SCIF. The industry ecosystem includes Booz Allen.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2006","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4165,"name":"George Tenet","slug":"george-tenet","type":"person"}},{"id":13404,"relationshipType":"donor","description":"As top Republican on Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, Calvert receives donations from defense contractors; Booz Allen is a major defense contractor in the known entities list, though not explicitly named in provided donation records.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11013,"name":"Ken Calvert","slug":"congress-c000059","type":"person"}},{"id":13075,"relationshipType":"employment","description":"Given CO-05's heavy defense sector presence and its professional/technical services industry (36,906 employees), firms like Booz Allen Hamilton likely operate in the district, though not explicitly named in Crank's facts.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10872,"name":"Jeff Crank","slug":"congress-c001137","type":"person"}},{"id":13025,"relationshipType":"committee_related_entity","description":"Bresnahan traded stock in companies related to his Transportation & Infrastructure committee work, and Booz Allen Hamilton is a known government contractor; no direct connection confirmed but noted in trading pattern context.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":456,"name":"Robert Bresnahan","slug":"robert-bresnahan","type":"elected_official"}},{"id":12740,"relationshipType":"potential implementation partner","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is a known Palantir systems integrator for DoD classified programs; Maven Smart System's architecture and data integration profile matches Booz Allen's typical role in Pentagon SAP AI programs.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2019","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":137,"name":"Maven Smart System","slug":"maven-smart-system","type":"instrument"}},{"id":12078,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"SAIC competes with Booz Allen Hamilton in the government services and consulting market.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6867,"name":"Tony Moraco","slug":"tony-moraco","type":"person"}},{"id":12057,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is a direct competitor to SAIC/Leidos in the defense and intelligence contracting market Beyster established.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"1969","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6863,"name":"J. Robert Beyster","slug":"j-robert-beyster","type":"person"}},{"id":627,"relationshipType":"industry_peer","description":"General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) competes with Booz Allen Hamilton in the federal IT and consulting services market, both serving defense and intelligence clients","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2011","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":129,"name":"General Dynamics","slug":"general-dynamics","type":"company"}},{"id":574,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both are major defense and intelligence contractors in the same market sector, both publicly traded with SEC filing obligations, competing for similar government contracts","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2009","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":108,"name":"CACI International","slug":"caci-international","type":"company"}},{"id":570,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both Leidos and Booz Allen Hamilton operate as major government contractors in the defense and IT services sector. The documented facts note Leidos is 'known as a major government contractor' and 'a major defense and IT contractor,' placing it in direct competition with Booz Allen Hamilton for similar federal contracts.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2014","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":107,"name":"Leidos","slug":"leidos","type":"company"}},{"id":568,"relationshipType":"competitive_relationship","description":"Both are publicly traded companies competing for federal government contracts in defense and intelligence services.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":108,"name":"CACI International","slug":"caci-international","type":"company"}},{"id":567,"relationshipType":"competitive_relationship","description":"Both companies are major federal contractors in the defense and intelligence space, competing for similar government contracts. SAIC spun off from Leidos, placing all three in competitive relationship with Booz Allen Hamilton.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":106,"name":"SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)","slug":"saic-science-applications-international-corporation","type":"company"}},{"id":566,"relationshipType":"competitive_relationship","description":"Both are major publicly traded federal contractors competing for similar government contracts in defense, intelligence, and homeland security. Their parallel SEC filing histories reflect similar business models.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":107,"name":"Leidos","slug":"leidos","type":"company"}},{"id":565,"relationshipType":"competitive_relationship","description":"Both companies compete for federal government contracts in the defense and intelligence analytics space. Booz Allen Hamilton's status as a publicly traded federal contractor places it in direct competition with Palantir for similar government work.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":17,"name":"Palantir Technologies","slug":"palantir-technologies","type":"company"}},{"id":564,"relationshipType":"industry_ecosystem","description":"Both entities operate in the intelligence community technology space. As a major intelligence contractor with consistent SEC filing activity, Booz Allen Hamilton operates in the same ecosystem as the CIA's venture capital arm.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":109,"name":"In-Q-Tel","slug":"in-q-tel","type":"institution"}},{"id":561,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is a major government contractor with significant Department of Defense business, as evidenced by its status as a publicly traded company with regular SEC filings and known reputation in the federal contracting space. The company's consistent SEC filing history indicates ongoing substantial government contract work.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":94,"name":"US Department of Defense (Pentagon)","slug":"us-department-of-defense-pentagon","type":"institution"}},{"id":288,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Both are federal contractors serving the Department of Defense. Nvidia provides GPU hardware while Booz Allen provides consulting and technology services, often for overlapping AI and high-performance computing programs.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":24,"name":"Nvidia","slug":"nvidia","type":"company"}},{"id":17014,"relationshipType":"government transparency database subject","description":"Systematically absent from standard USASpending searches despite documented 97% government revenue dependency; $6.2B in FY2024 obligations found via DUNS number search; gap of $4.1-4.5B unaccounted for by explicit public contract records.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":462,"name":"USASpending.gov","slug":"usaspending-gov","type":"institution"}},{"id":17013,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"Filed SEC filings regularly (2016-2025) with documented gaps in 2017, 2021, 2022, and 2024 indicating a 40% absence rate; FD FY2024 10-K filed May 24, 2024 (accession 0001443646-24-000010).","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":391,"name":"Securities and Exchange Commission","slug":"securities-and-exchange-commission","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":13295,"relationshipType":"donor","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton PAC heavily backed Strong's 2026 reelection bid","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10964,"name":"Dale W. Strong","slug":"congress-s001220","type":"person"}},{"id":11861,"relationshipType":"contracted_by","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is one of six contractors for the DARPA TASS contract.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6810,"name":"DARPA Technical and Analytical Support Services (TASS)","slug":"darpa-technical-and-analytical-support-services-tass","type":"instrument"}},{"id":17018,"relationshipType":"industry peer / comparator","description":"Booz Allen's lobbying intensity ($1.67M-$1.83M/yr) is significantly lower than defense primes like RTX ($13-15M/yr), suggesting different influence mechanisms.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":130,"name":"Raytheon Technologies (RTX)","slug":"raytheon-technologies-rtx","type":"company"}},{"id":11781,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton has held multiple contracts with ARL, providing scientific, engineering, and technical assistance services for research programs.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"1980","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4577,"name":"DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (ARL)","slug":"devcom-army-research-laboratory-arl","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":522,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is a major intelligence community contractor providing consulting and technology services. Classified contract relationships explain absence from standard procurement databases.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"1940s","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":85,"name":"Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)","slug":"central-intelligence-agency-cia","type":"institution"}},{"id":501,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Booz Allen Hamilton is identified as a major NSA contractor. The investigative note recommends researching NSA contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton to find procurement and lobbying paper trails that are not visible when searching for NSA directly.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2013","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":86,"name":"National Security Agency (NSA)","slug":"national-security-agency-nsa","type":"institution"}}],"contradictions":[],"permalink":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/booz-allen-hamilton","timelineUrl":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/booz-allen-hamilton/timeline"}