{"entity":{"id":107,"slug":"leidos","name":"Leidos","type":"company","role":"US defence IT contractor; health IT and intelligence","description":"Major US defence, intelligence, and health IT contractor. Revenue exceeds $15B annually. Like Palantir, Leidos has significant DHS and DoD contracts. Leidos acquired Lockheed Martin's IS&GS division in 2016, making it one of the top five US government IT contractors by revenue.","imageUrl":null,"createdAt":"2026-04-05T19:58:39.419Z","updatedAt":"2026-06-09T17:30:38.728Z"},"electedOffice":null,"significance":{"score":18,"components":{"totalFindings":8,"connectionDegree":8,"recentFindings90d":0,"activeResearchJobs":0,"goblinAttributions":2,"recentSyntheses90d":0,"moneyFlowChainsTotal":0,"closedLoopMemberships":0,"moneyFlowHopsRecent90d":0},"computedAt":"2026-10-16T01:34:31.424Z"},"facts":[{"id":19120,"text":"Leidos expected to complete financial system integration in first quarter of following year after July 2017","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2017-07-01","source":{"title":"Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition","url":"https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search/","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":19119,"text":"On July 1, 2017, Leidos transitioned IS&GS employees into consolidated HR and payroll systems and moved purchasing into single procurement system","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2017-07-01","source":{"title":"Wikipedia description of 2005 DSEI exhibition","url":"https://www.sec.gov/search-filings","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":62401,"text":"Leidos likely operated dual financial systems for IS&GS and legacy Leidos contracts from August 2016 through at least early 2018, based on the stated financial integration timeline and the need to preserve contract identifiers for DCAA audit continuity.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2018","source":null},{"id":66945,"text":"During the 11-month period between August 2016 and July 2017, Leidos likely maintained parallel financial and HR systems for IS&GS employees, which would have required manual or semi-automated interfaces to preserve contract cost accounting from the legacy Lockheed Martin systems","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":62271,"text":"The 11-month delay in HR/payroll integration post-acquisition suggests that the 25,000 IS&GS employees continued operating under Lockheed Martin's internal administrative systems for nearly one fiscal year, which would be inconsistent with a claim that immediate identifier changes were required for work continuity but consistent with a standard contractual novation period.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":11823,"text":"The concurrent transfer of classified government contracts during the IS&GS acquisition may have required CFIUS-imposed disclosure timing restrictions that forced Leidos to consolidate routine quarterly disclosures into annual reports","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":11822,"text":"Federal securities regulations require Form 8-K disclosure within four business days of material definitive agreements, making consolidated or amended filings a likely compliance strategy for Leidos's overlapping acquisition and divestiture activities during 2016-2017","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":11821,"text":"The Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS transaction structure with two-phase equity divestiture (50.5% to sub-20%) created mandatory cross-company related-party disclosure obligations that would require coordination of SEC filing schedules between both corporations","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":11816,"text":"The two-phase divestiture structure where Lockheed Martin retained 50.5% equity before reducing to below 20% would have created ongoing quarterly related-party disclosure obligations in both companies' 10-Q and 10-K filings throughout 2016-2017","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":9970,"text":"CFIUS approval requirements for the IS&GS transaction may have imposed disclosure timing restrictions that altered Leidos's standard quarterly reporting patterns during the 2016-2017 integration period","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":9969,"text":"The Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition likely generated extensive Form 8-K and proxy statement filings during 2016-2017 that would contradict any premise of reduced SEC disclosure activity during the corporate transformation period","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":9961,"text":"The IS&GS acquisition doubled Leidos's workforce from approximately 20,000 to 40,000+ employees, requiring extensive integration disclosures that may have consolidated routine quarterly filings into annual reports during the transition period","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":9958,"text":"Leidos's concurrent divestiture of health and engineering businesses while acquiring IS&GS created overlapping disclosure obligations that may have resulted in consolidated or amended filings not captured in standard SEC searches","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":8013,"text":"The apparent gap in SEC filings between 2015-2018 may correspond to the period of major corporate transformation including the Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition, potentially indicating intensive merger-related SEC activity not captured in the current dataset","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-2017","source":null},{"id":62267,"text":"Leidos's special-purpose merger subsidiary Lion Merger Co. may have held certain IS&GS contract liabilities briefly between August 2016 and full integration (July 2017), creating a period where contracts were searchable under an entity name ('Lion Merger Co.') that would not return results for a 'Leidos' search in USASpending.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08 to 2017-07","source":null},{"id":62272,"text":"The Leidos-IS&GS acquisition used a Reverse Morris Trust structure common for tax-free spin-mergers, which inherently requires stock distribution to Lockheed Martin shareholders and does not by itself indicate any intent related to lobbying arrangement opacity.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":67205,"text":"Leidos' acquisition of Lockheed IS&GS used a Reverse Morris Trust structure that typically involves creation of a special-purpose merger subsidiary (Lion Merger Co.), which may require separate DUNS/UEI identifiers in federal systems for a period post-close, expanding the identifier ambiguity beyond just two entities","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":67208,"text":"The Reverse Morris Trust structure used in the Leidos/Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition likely deferred federal capital gains tax on the $1.8 billion cash payment to Lockheed Martin, a standard feature of such transactions","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":66109,"text":"No public CFIUS filing or notice was ever published for the $4.6 billion Leidos-Lockheed IS&GS transaction, which is consistent with the transaction having been structured to fall below mandatory notification thresholds.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":66941,"text":"Leidos's 8-K filing (8/16/2016) confirms Lion Merger Co. merged into Leidos on the effective date, meaning the subsidiary's legal existence was extinguished on that day — not retained through July 2017 — making it impossible for Lion Merger Co. to appear as a standalone awardee in USASpending after August 2016.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":66108,"text":"Leidos's use of a special-purpose merger subsidiary ('Lion Merger Co.') is a structural element consistent with complex deal engineering to maintain U.S. ownership and control thresholds, including those relevant to FOCI mitigation and ITAR compliance.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":62399,"text":"The Reverse Morris Trust structure required approximately 77 million Leidos shares to be distributed to Lockheed Martin shareholders, creating a dual-ownership period that may have complicated contract administration processes","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":61848,"text":"The IS&GS acquisition was structured as a Reverse Morris Trust transaction specifically to distribute Lockheed Martin's IS&GS shares to Lockheed shareholders, who then held 50.5% of Leidos stock — a structure that avoids a direct 'foreign person' acquisition and may have been designed to stay below CFIUS notification thresholds","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":66949,"text":"Leidos's acquisition of Lockheed Martin IS&GS closed on August 16, 2016, but the first day employees of the acquired division could have been operating under Leidos's consolidated HR/payroll systems was July 1, 2017 — a period of 319 days.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":67209,"text":"Lockheed Martin retained approximately 50.5% ownership of Leidos common stock immediately after the August 2016 transaction, creating a temporary dual-ownership period that could have affected government contract administration during integration","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":null},{"id":19118,"text":"Lockheed Martin stockholders received approximately 50.5% stake in Leidos (approximately 77 million shares)","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":{"title":"Transaction documents and SEC filings","url":"https://research.secdatabase.com/CIK/1336920","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":19115,"text":"The transaction involved $1.8 billion special cash payment to Lockheed Martin and $2.8 billion in Leidos common stock distribution","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":{"title":"SEC filings and company announcements detailing transaction structure","url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1336920/000133692019000004/ldos12282018form10-k.htm","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":19114,"text":"On August 16, 2016, Leidos completed the acquisition of Lockheed Martin's Information Systems & Global Solutions business through a Reverse Morris Trust transaction valued at $4.6 billion","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":"2016-08-16","source":{"title":"Multiple SEC filings and press releases confirming transaction closure","url":"https://investors.leidos.com/financial-information/sec-filings","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":61847,"text":"Leidos' August 8, 2016 S-4 registration statement for the IS&GS acquisition does not reference CFIUS review or notification as a required regulatory approval for the transaction, suggesting the parties determined the transaction did not trigger CFIUS jurisdiction under the Exon-Florio amendment","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-08","source":null},{"id":61851,"text":"Leidos's pre-merger S-4 registration statement (filed August 2016) contained audited historical financial statements of IS&GS for FY2013-FY2015, fulfilling the SEC's extra disclosure requirements for a Reverse Morris Trust transaction months before the integration period began.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-08-01","source":null},{"id":62266,"text":"The Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition was structured as a Reverse Morris Trust, which likely required contract novation for all existing federal contracts held by Lockheed IS&GS, a process that can temporarily remove those contracts from public visibility in USASpending while new DUNS/CAGE codes are registered.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":62476,"text":"Leidos' 2016 acquisition of Lockheed Martin IS&GS likely triggered a Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) Facility Clearance transfer determination, which is procedurally distinct from CFIUS review but often conflated in public reporting on classified contract transfers","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":69535,"text":"The $1.8 billion cash payment to Lockheed Martin exceeded the 50% RMT cash cap if measured against Leidos's pre-acquisition enterprise value (approximately $3.5 billion), but fit within the cap when measured against the combined entity's value (approximately $8.1 billion) — suggesting the cap was calculated post-merger, not pre-merger","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":11817,"text":"CFIUS approval requirements for the IS&GS transaction due to classified contract transfers may have imposed disclosure sequencing restrictions that could explain altered SEC filing timing patterns during the review period","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":11815,"text":"Federal securities regulations mandate Form 8-K disclosure within four business days of material definitive agreements, making extensive SEC filings legally required for the $4.6 billion Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS transaction regardless of corporate preference","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9967,"text":"Leidos's concurrent business unit divestitures during the IS&GS acquisition period suggest strategic corporate restructuring designed to isolate government contracting operations, potentially including subsidiary-based lobbying arrangements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9965,"text":"Leidos's 2016 acquisition of Lockheed Martin's IS&GS division likely preserved original corporate vehicles and DUNS numbers for classified contract continuity, creating a parallel corporate identity system that could enable selective political disclosure","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9964,"text":"Lockheed Martin's retention of majority equity stake (50.5%) immediately post-transaction created dual corporate control that may have delayed federal contract database updates pending full divestiture","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9963,"text":"The concurrent transfer of approximately 25,000 IS&GS employees with existing security clearances may have required contract identifier preservation to maintain classified work continuity, complicating standard DUNS consolidation procedures","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9962,"text":"The Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition required CFIUS approval due to classified contract transfers, potentially creating special contract identifier transition protocols that could explain systematic database visibility issues","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9960,"text":"Lockheed Martin retained a 50.5% equity stake in Leidos immediately post-transaction before divesting to below 20%, creating ongoing related-party disclosure obligations that may have complicated standard SEC reporting cycles","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9959,"text":"The Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS transaction required CFIUS approval due to the transfer of classified government contracts, potentially creating disclosure timing restrictions that could explain altered SEC filing patterns during 2016-2017","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9957,"text":"The Leidos-Lockheed Martin IS&GS transaction required shareholder approval and regulatory clearances that would mandate specific SEC disclosure filings, making their apparent absence in available datasets a data collection or access issue rather than non-filing","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":8017,"text":"Leidos's 2016 acquisition of Lockheed Martin's IS&GS division may have created contract data visibility issues if inherited contracts maintained original corporate identifiers or DUNS numbers in federal systems","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2016-06-15","source":null},{"id":9968,"text":"The claimed 'gap in available SEC filing data' between 2015-2018 is contradicted by documented SEC filings on 2015-03-25 and 2018-02-23, indicating the issue is data collection methodology rather than missing corporate disclosures","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2015-2018","source":null},{"id":8021,"text":"The 2015-2018 apparent gap in available SEC filing data corresponds to Leidos's most significant corporate transformation period, suggesting either systematic data collection issues or intensive merger-related disclosure activity not captured in current datasets","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2015-2018","source":null},{"id":8015,"text":"The apparent filing gap between 2015-2018 in available data coincides with Leidos's major corporate transformation period, including the 2016 Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition worth approximately $4.6 billion","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2015-2018","source":null},{"id":5254,"text":"Leidos has maintained consistent SEC filing activity from 2014-2019, indicating it has been a publicly traded company with ongoing disclosure obligations during this period","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2014-2019","source":null},{"id":8014,"text":"The concentration of Leidos SEC filings on 2014-03-27 likely represents the company's initial public disclosure obligations as an independent entity following the SAIC corporate restructuring, rather than coincidental routine filings","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2014-03-27","source":null},{"id":5255,"text":"Multiple SEC filings in close proximity (March 2014 shows two filings on the same date 2014-03-27) may indicate significant corporate events such as the SAIC/Leidos split that occurred around that time","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2014-03-27","source":null},{"id":2853,"text":"Leidos filed filing with the SEC on 2014-03-27. Accession number: N/A.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2014-03-27","source":{"title":"SEC EDGAR: filing — Leidos (2014-03-27)","url":"https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Leidos&CIK=&type=&dateb=&owner=include&count=40&search_text=&action=getcompany","publication":"SEC EDGAR"}},{"id":8012,"text":"Leidos' SEC filing pattern shows concentrated activity in March 2014, suggesting this represents the company's initial filings as an independent public entity following the SAIC corporate split","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2014-03-15","source":null},{"id":9966,"text":"The systematic absence of Leidos from federal lobbying databases despite $15B+ revenue and top-5 contractor status indicates high probability of subsidiary-based political engagement, consistent with documented corporate structure fragmentation following major acquisitions","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":8020,"text":"Leidos appears to follow a calendar year fiscal cycle (December 31 year-end) based on consistent February/March SEC filing timing, which is standard for most defense contractors but creates potential reporting timeline misalignments with federal government fiscal year cycles","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":8019,"text":"Major defense contractors like Leidos increasingly conduct lobbying through subsidiary entities to obscure parent company political engagement, explaining the absence of direct 'Leidos' lobbying registrations while maintaining significant federal influence","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":8018,"text":"The systematic absence of Leidos from federal transparency databases despite $15B+ revenue likely reflects deliberate corporate structure fragmentation following the 2016 Lockheed Martin IS&GS acquisition, where inherited contracts and lobbying activities may operate under subsidiary DUNS numbers","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":8016,"text":"The systematic absence of Leidos from federal transparency databases (USASpending, lobbying disclosures) despite documented $15B+ annual revenue and top-5 contractor status indicates potential data fragmentation across subsidiary entities or special classification handling","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5258,"text":"Annual report filings appear in February/March timeframe (2015-03-25, 2018-02-23, 2019-02-19) consistent with fiscal year-end reporting cycles","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5257,"text":"No lobbying disclosure results were returned despite Leidos being a major defense and IT contractor that typically engages in federal lobbying activities, indicating incomplete data capture that requires verification through OpenSecrets or direct lobbying database searches","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5256,"text":"The absence of results from USASpending contract searches is notable given Leidos is known as a major government contractor, suggesting potential data retrieval limitations or search parameter issues that warrant further investigation through alternative sources","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5252,"text":"No court records found for \"Leidos\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5251,"text":"No lobbying disclosures found for \"Leidos\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5250,"text":"No corporate registrations found for \"Leidos\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5249,"text":"No usaspending contracts found for \"Leidos\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null}],"connections":[{"id":8093,"relationshipType":"employment","description":"Chairman and CEO who continued post-merger","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6874,"name":"Roger A. Krone","slug":"roger-a-krone","type":"person"}},{"id":8092,"relationshipType":"subsidiary","description":"Lion Merger Co. was special purpose merger subsidiary of Leidos","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6872,"name":"Lion Merger Co.","slug":"lion-merger-co","type":"company"}},{"id":8090,"relationshipType":"acquisition","description":"Leidos acquired Abacus through reverse Morris trust merger","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6871,"name":"Abacus Innovations Corporation","slug":"abacus-innovations-corporation","type":"company"}},{"id":8085,"relationshipType":"subsidiary","description":"SAIC spun off in 2013, with parent company becoming Leidos","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":106,"name":"SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)","slug":"saic-science-applications-international-corporation","type":"company"}},{"id":21462,"relationshipType":"contractor / vendor","description":"Leidos has participated in SOFWERX events and has been awarded technology prototyping contracts through USSOCOM for systems including biometrics, identity intelligence, and data analytics platforms relevant to special operations.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4158,"name":"SOFWERX","slug":"sofwerx","type":"organization"}},{"id":20860,"relationshipType":"SEC Filing Contractor / Material Risk Disclosure","description":"SEC filings referencing DOGE are likely from publicly traded contractors including Leidos, disclosing DOGE-related contract impacts under SEC materiality rules.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":91,"name":"Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)","slug":"department-of-government-efficiency-doge","type":"instrument"}},{"id":19364,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Leidos is identified as a plausible conduit for the kind of indirect federal contracting patterns associated with Unit 8200-connected companies like Wiz.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2020","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":104,"name":"Wiz","slug":"wiz","type":"company"}},{"id":18452,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"As Senate Majority Leader (2021-2025), Schumer would have oversight of federal contracts. Leidos is a major defense contractor. The documented facts do not contain direct evidence of a relationship.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":7826,"name":"Chuck Schumer","slug":"chuck-schumer","type":"elected_official"}},{"id":17881,"relationshipType":"Corporate alias / Alternative Name","description":"Leidos Innovations Corporation is a subsidiary or alternative legal name for Leidos, the defense, aviation, information technology, and biomedical research company.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2017","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6873,"name":"Leidos Innovations Corporation","slug":"leidos-innovations-corporation","type":"company"}},{"id":17861,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Leidos is identified as an NSA contractor. NSA's administrative co-location with U.S. Cyber Command at Fort Meade creates shared procurement vehicles where identical IT infrastructure contracts may appear under both NSA and CYBERCOM contracting office attributions.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":86,"name":"National Security Agency (NSA)","slug":"national-security-agency-nsa","type":"institution"}},{"id":17376,"relationshipType":"donor","description":"Misc Defense is a top contributing industry ($248,311) and Leidos is a major defense contractor; Wittman sits on the committee that oversees defense spending.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11163,"name":"Robert J. Wittman","slug":"congress-w000804","type":"person"}},{"id":17150,"relationshipType":"Industry Peer","description":"L3Harris Technologies and Leidos are both defense contractors that likely maintain subsidiary structures for federal contracting, similar post-merger integration patterns.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2019","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":131,"name":"L3Harris Technologies","slug":"l3harris-technologies","type":"company"}},{"id":17039,"relationshipType":"subsidiary","description":"CACI, Inc. - Federal is listed as a known entity immediately following Leidos Innovations Corporation in the same corporate family structure of CACI International, indicating potential shared contracting or corporate identity patterns.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6878,"name":"CACI, Inc. - Federal","slug":"caci-inc-federal","type":"company"}},{"id":16659,"relationshipType":"no confirmed direct connection","description":"No documented connection.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"N/A","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11079,"name":"Sean Casten","slug":"congress-c001117","type":"person"}},{"id":15587,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"AAS manages complex classified contracts; Leidos is a major provider of such services to government.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4153,"name":"Office of Assisted Acquisition Services (AAS)","slug":"office-of-assisted-acquisition-services-aas","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":14118,"relationshipType":"associated_organization","description":"Tenet's post-CIA board seats included defense contractors similar to Leidos; SAIC (which later split into Leidos and SAIC) provided him a SCIF.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2006","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4165,"name":"George Tenet","slug":"george-tenet","type":"person"}},{"id":13405,"relationshipType":"donor","description":"Leidos is a major defense contractor in the known entities list; Calvert's defense appropriations role attracts contractor donations, though Leidos not explicitly named in provided records.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11013,"name":"Ken Calvert","slug":"congress-c000059","type":"person"}},{"id":13076,"relationshipType":"employment","description":"Given CO-05's defense-heavy economy and professional/technical services sector, Leidos (a major defense contractor) could have a presence in the district, though not explicitly named in Crank's facts.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10872,"name":"Jeff Crank","slug":"congress-c001137","type":"person"}},{"id":12109,"relationshipType":"Executive","description":"Surya N. Mohapatra is listed in the known entities database in close proximity to Leidos executives (Roger A. Krone, Gregory R. Dahlberg) and appears to be associated with Leidos (formerly SAIC) based on the context of the known entities list.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2008","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6876,"name":"Surya N. Mohapatra","slug":"surya-n-mohapatra","type":"person"}},{"id":12088,"relationshipType":"membership","description":"Jim Reagan is a known entity associated with Leidos, as evidenced by his inclusion in a database list of entities that prominently features Leidos and its leadership. The listed facts indicate he filed an SEC filing in 2007, suggesting professional financial activity, though no specific records connect him directly to Leidos beyond co-occurrence in the data.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2007","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6868,"name":"Jim Reagan","slug":"jim-reagan","type":"person"}},{"id":12077,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"SAIC and Leidos are major competitors in the government services and defense contracting market. Leidos was formed from the spin-off of SAIC's technical services business.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6867,"name":"Tony Moraco","slug":"tony-moraco","type":"person"}},{"id":628,"relationshipType":"industry_peer","description":"Both compete in the federal IT services and defense contracting space, with overlapping customer bases in the Pentagon and intelligence community","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2011","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":129,"name":"General Dynamics","slug":"general-dynamics","type":"company"}},{"id":571,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both companies operate in the government contracting space for defense and IT services. The documented facts characterize Leidos as 'a major defense and IT contractor,' which places it in the same competitive market segment as CACI International.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2014","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":108,"name":"CACI International","slug":"caci-international","type":"company"}},{"id":570,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both Leidos and Booz Allen Hamilton operate as major government contractors in the defense and IT services sector. The documented facts note Leidos is 'known as a major government contractor' and 'a major defense and IT contractor,' placing it in direct competition with Booz Allen Hamilton for similar federal contracts.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2014","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":105,"name":"Booz Allen Hamilton","slug":"booz-allen-hamilton","type":"company"}},{"id":566,"relationshipType":"competitive_relationship","description":"Both are major publicly traded federal contractors competing for similar government contracts in defense, intelligence, and homeland security. Their parallel SEC filing histories reflect similar business models.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2016","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":105,"name":"Booz Allen Hamilton","slug":"booz-allen-hamilton","type":"company"}},{"id":289,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Both are federal contractors with Department of Defense contracts. Leidos integrates advanced computing solutions that often incorporate Nvidia GPU technology for defense applications.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":24,"name":"Nvidia","slug":"nvidia","type":"company"}},{"id":17038,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Leidos is documented as a major defense contractor with $15B+ annual revenue and top-5 contractor status, though direct USASpending contracts were not found in the queried databases.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2014","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":94,"name":"US Department of Defense (Pentagon)","slug":"us-department-of-defense-pentagon","type":"institution"}},{"id":13616,"relationshipType":"donor","description":"Leidos PAC donated $1,000 to Kelly's 2025-2026 campaign","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11117,"name":"Trent Kelly","slug":"congress-k000388","type":"person"}},{"id":13391,"relationshipType":"campaign contributor","description":"Leidos Inc contributed $103,027 ($44,777 individual + $58,250 PAC) to Issa's campaign.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"1997","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11012,"name":"Darrell Issa","slug":"congress-i000056","type":"person"}},{"id":13296,"relationshipType":"donor","description":"Leidos Inc contributed $28,800 ($18,800 individual + $10,000 PAC)","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10964,"name":"Dale W. Strong","slug":"congress-s001220","type":"person"}},{"id":20852,"relationshipType":"industry peer / competitor","description":"Both Northrop Grumman and Leidos are major U.S. defense contractors listed in the same database of entities.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":36599,"name":"Northrop Grumman","slug":"northrop-grumman","type":"company"}},{"id":19233,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Leidos is a defense contractor that provides services to the US Navy.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2019","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":83,"name":"US Navy","slug":"us-navy","type":"institution"}},{"id":12104,"relationshipType":"membership","description":"Gregory R. Dahlberg is listed in the known entities database among leadership figures associated with Leidos (appears in a cluster with Roger A. Krone, Surya N. Mohapatra, Susan M. Stalnecker).","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"unknown","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6875,"name":"Gregory R. Dahlberg","slug":"gregory-r-dahlberg","type":"person"}},{"id":12062,"relationshipType":"Former Executive / Leadership","description":"Kenneth Dahlberg is listed in the known entities database in close proximity to the Leidos entry, alongside other Leidos executives such as Tony Moraco, Jim Reagan, and Roger A. Krone, indicating he served as a senior executive or board member at Leidos.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2003","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6866,"name":"Kenneth Dahlberg","slug":"kenneth-dahlberg","type":"person"}},{"id":11784,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Leidos has provided technical support services to ARL for sensor development, cybersecurity research, and data analytics programs.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"1995","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4577,"name":"DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (ARL)","slug":"devcom-army-research-laboratory-arl","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":11331,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"NGA awarded Leidos a $206 million contract (May 2024) to modernize legacy software for exploiting incoming data, an $85.5 million follow-on contract for mission applications, and a $107 million GEOINT products contract. Leidos inherited much of SAIC's legacy NSA-NGA contracting portfolio.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4182,"name":"National Imagery and Mapping Agency","slug":"national-imagery-and-mapping-agency","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":524,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"Leidos (formerly part of SAIC) provides technology and analysis services to the intelligence community including the CIA under classified procurement arrangements.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2013","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":85,"name":"Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)","slug":"central-intelligence-agency-cia","type":"institution"}}],"contradictions":[],"permalink":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/leidos","timelineUrl":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/leidos/timeline"}