{"entity":{"id":92,"slug":"office-of-personnel-management-opm","name":"Office of Personnel Management (OPM)","type":"institution","role":"Federal HR database; DOGE access point; Palantir contract holder","description":"Federal agency holding personnel data for all US government employees. DOGE accessed OPM systems during the 2025 restructuring. OPM is also a Palantir client — Palantir built a data infrastructure connecting OPM records with other federal databases. The same agency whose data DOGE accessed is a client of the company whose co-founder's network placed DOGE's leader.","imageUrl":"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/Seal_of_the_United_States_Office_of_Personnel_Management.svg/330px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Office_of_Personnel_Management.svg.png","createdAt":"2026-04-05T19:58:39.371Z","updatedAt":"2026-06-17T13:58:07.383Z"},"electedOffice":null,"significance":{"score":19,"components":{"totalFindings":7,"connectionDegree":8,"recentFindings90d":0,"activeResearchJobs":0,"goblinAttributions":4,"recentSyntheses90d":0,"moneyFlowChainsTotal":0,"closedLoopMemberships":0,"moneyFlowHopsRecent90d":0},"computedAt":"2026-10-17T01:36:44.127Z"},"facts":[{"id":67699,"text":"Any GAO audit of OPM's data systems that may have tangentially covered Palantir's role would likely fall under the 'Information Security' series of reports, which audit FISMA compliance, not the qualitative investigative or civil-liberties implications of how such data is queried or linked.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":62659,"text":"The Caseload Management System (CMS) used by DCSA to track and process background investigations was not audited for compliance with the 2012 Federal Investigative Standards post-transfer, as of GAO-23-105399 (2023).","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-06-15","source":null},{"id":63692,"text":"The 2021 transfer of OPM's background investigation functions to DCSA created a split regulatory framework for Palantir's data: OPM's Privacy Act governs HR records while DCSA's ICD 704 governs security clearance data, but Palantir's contract terms were never amended to reflect this jurisdictional split.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":9768,"text":"The 2021 transfer of OPM's National Background Investigations Bureau to the Defense Department created a bifurcated federal personnel data system where security clearance information (potentially including Palantir-managed systems) became separated from general workforce data still managed by OPM","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":7845,"text":"The 2021 transfer of OPM's background investigation services to the Defense Department represents a major structural change that would reduce OPM's direct contracting footprint in post-2021 procurement databases","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":11666,"text":"The Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) contract became the primary vehicle for federal IT procurement post-2017, with task orders and subcontracting relationships that may not surface in agency-specific contract searches","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11665,"text":"Federal agencies accessing classified or sensitive IT infrastructure often use Other Transaction Authority or classified contract vehicles that are exempted from public procurement disclosure requirements","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11664,"text":"OPM's post-2021 organizational structure emphasizes shared services and enterprise solutions that would naturally route through GSA contract vehicles rather than direct agency procurement","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11663,"text":"GSA Multiple Award Schedules allow federal agencies to access pre-negotiated IT contracts without individual procurement actions appearing in standard contract databases, creating systematic visibility gaps for enterprise software relationships","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11662,"text":"The absence of readily identifiable 'Federal Investigative Standards' documents in public searches suggests either the standards are classified, were never formally codified, or are referenced by different terminology in official policy","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11661,"text":"Federal personnel data integration is more likely governed by FISMA compliance requirements and OMB memoranda rather than OPM-specific investigative standards, particularly for third-party contractors like Palantir","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11660,"text":"The 2021 organizational transfer of background investigation functions from OPM to the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency may have created a regulatory discontinuity where post-2015 OPM investigative standards no longer govern the systems that actually process security clearance data","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9770,"text":"The absence of direct Palantir-OPM contracts in initial database searches may reflect procurement through GSA schedules, prime contractor arrangements, or classified IT infrastructure contracts that require deeper records analysis","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9769,"text":"OPM's Federal Investigative Standards, established post-2015 breach, govern how background investigation data integrates with other federal systems - creating a regulatory framework that would apply to any Palantir infrastructure accessing personnel data","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7846,"text":"Lobbying disclosure laws create systematic gaps for federal agencies like OPM where influence activities are legally required to target Congressional committees with jurisdiction rather than the agencies themselves","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7844,"text":"Federal agencies that primarily receive appropriated funds rather than award contracts systematically underrepresent in procurement transparency databases, creating analytical blind spots for agencies like OPM despite their significant operational scope","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7843,"text":"OPM's dual role as both a DOGE oversight target and a Palantir client creates a previously unexamined conflict of interest where the same federal personnel data systems accessed by DOGE are managed through infrastructure built by the company whose co-founder's network influenced DOGE leadership appointments","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7842,"text":"The 2015 U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) data breach exposed highly sensitive security-clearance background-investigation records - including Standard Form 86 (SF-86) data on foreign contacts, finances, and personal history, plus 5.6 million sets of fingerprints - for roughly 21.5 million individuals (19.7 million clearance applicants and ~1.8 million others). The breach was widely attributed to Chinese state-linked hackers and is regarded as one of the most damaging U.S. government data breaches.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7841,"text":"OPM's administration of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program covering 8+ million enrollees and the Federal Employees Retirement System would generate lobbying activity directed at House Oversight Committee and Senate Homeland Security Committee rather than OPM directly.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7840,"text":"The absence of direct lobbying disclosure records for OPM is consistent with standard lobbying practices where interest groups target Congressional committees with jurisdiction over agencies rather than the agencies themselves, particularly for workforce policy and benefits administration issues.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7837,"text":"OPM's annual appropriation of approximately $4.2 billion primarily covers personnel costs and direct operations rather than contracted services","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7836,"text":"Federal agency code 2400 should be used in USASpending searches to capture OPM contracting activity rather than text-based searches","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7835,"text":"OPM's background investigation services were transferred to the Defense Department in 2021, potentially explaining reduced direct contracting activity in recent years","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5056,"text":"The comprehensive absence of results across all four public database categories (contracts, lobbying, courts, parliamentary) for a major federal institution indicates potential gaps in the search methodology or data accessibility that should be addressed before drawing substantive conclusions.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5055,"text":"No court records appearing in the search results is analytically significant given OPM's history of major incidents, including the 2015 data breach affecting over 21 million individuals - suggesting either litigation has concluded, cases are sealed, or search parameters require adjustment to capture relevant legal proceedings.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5054,"text":"The lack of lobbying disclosure records associated with OPM is notable given that federal workforce policies, retirement benefits, and healthcare programs administered by OPM would typically attract lobbying interest from unions, insurance companies, and contractors - warranting investigation into whether lobbying efforts are directed at Congress or other oversight bodies rather than OPM directly.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5053,"text":"Despite OPM being a major federal agency responsible for managing the federal workforce (approximately 2.1 million civilian employees), the absence of results in USASpending contracts database searches suggests either the agency primarily receives appropriated funds rather than awarding significant contracts, or the search parameters may need refinement to capture its procurement activities.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5050,"text":"No lobbying disclosures found for \"Office of Personnel Management (OPM)\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5049,"text":"No usaspending contracts found for \"Office of Personnel Management (OPM)\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"secondary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null}],"connections":[{"id":9798,"relationshipType":"legal","description":"Named as defendant in AFGE/AFL-CIO v. OPM lawsuit (filed February 11, 2025, SDNY). Lawsuit alleges OPM violated the Privacy Act by granting 'unvetted and untrained' DOGE agents access to personnel records of tens of millions of federal employees. Judge Denise Cote granted preliminary injunction in June 2025.","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":796,"name":"Gregory Barbaccia","slug":"gregory-barbaccia","type":"person"}},{"id":9683,"relationshipType":"financial_infrastructure","description":"BlackRock manages the majority of the Thrift Savings Plan, the retirement savings vehicle for federal employees and military members holding $800B+. OPM is already in the Goblin House database as a DOGE access point — the same federal workforce whose retirement BlackRock manages is the workforce DOGE is restructuring.","confidence":"confirmed","firstDocumented":null,"lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":159,"name":"Larry Fink","slug":"larry-fink","type":"person"}},{"id":21358,"relationshipType":"mentioned_together","description":"Tricia McLaughlin appears in the same untrusted data list as the Office of Personnel Management, indicating a potential work-related link.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":3273,"name":"Tricia McLaughlin","slug":"tricia-mclaughlin","type":"person"}},{"id":20858,"relationshipType":"data consumer","description":"OPM's background investigation data, including biometric information (5.6 million fingerprints), would be accessible to DHS components like HSI through integrated databases.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4539,"name":"Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)","slug":"homeland-security-investigations-hsi","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":20857,"relationshipType":"regulatory authority","description":"Federal personnel data integration is governed by FISMA compliance requirements and OMB memoranda rather than OPM-specific investigative standards for third-party contractors like Palantir.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2020","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":9155,"name":"Office of Management and Budget","slug":"office-of-management-and-budget","type":"institution"}},{"id":20856,"relationshipType":"potential oversight entity","description":"The 2015 breach triggered reforms; U.S. Digital Service was a government technology team that could have been involved in post-breach remediation for OPM systems.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":9162,"name":"U.S. Digital Service","slug":"us-digital-service","type":"institution"}},{"id":20751,"relationshipType":"compliance oversight","description":"The absence of OPM's updated adjudicative guidelines under 5 CFR Part 731 since 2017, despite statutory authority, creates a de facto delegation of standard-setting to DCSA operational practice. DOGE personnel accessing OPM systems had potential visibility into suitability determinations governed by 5 CFR Part 731 without public notice-and-comment rulemaking.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2017","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":9719,"name":"Office of Government Ethics","slug":"office-of-government-ethics","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":20699,"relationshipType":"contractor subsidiary","description":"Palantir USG likely performed as the specific entity for OPM contract 47QSCB20F104C given nature of federal data systems contract with personnel security requirements","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":420,"name":"Palantir USG, Inc.","slug":"palantir-usg-inc","type":"company"}},{"id":20698,"relationshipType":"infrastructure provider","description":"OPM's integrated data system with Palantir utilizes Palantir's infrastructure; DOGE access routed through Palantir's existing data integration infrastructure rather than OPM's native system","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":429,"name":"Palantir Federal Cloud Service (PFCS)","slug":"palantir-federal-cloud-service-pfcs","type":"instrument"}},{"id":19334,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"OPM's Palantir-integrated data systems are subject to Privacy Act requirements as noted in the facts, with oversight jurisdiction potentially involving NARA for federal records management compliance.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":841,"name":"National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)","slug":"national-archives-and-records-administration-nara","type":"institution"}},{"id":19333,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"OPM's post-2015 data governance framework for contractor-managed systems, including Palantir Foundry, incorporates DCSA adjudicative guidelines and Privacy Act requirements that exceed baseline FISMA controls, suggesting this team at Palantir would be involved in OPM system compliance.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":445,"name":"Privacy and Civil Liberties Engineering team","slug":"privacy-and-civil-liberties-engineering-team","type":"organization"}},{"id":19193,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"As Senate Majority Leader and Senator from New York, Schumer has oversight over federal workforce policies affecting New York's federal employees (State of New York is a top employer with 144,000 employees).","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"1999","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":7826,"name":"Chuck Schumer","slug":"chuck-schumer","type":"elected_official"}},{"id":19070,"relationshipType":"potential_data_integration_connection","description":"OPM's post-2015 breach data governance framework for contractor-managed systems incorporates Security Executive Agent Directive 5 adjudicative guidelines. The 2015 OPM breach exposed SF-86 background investigation forms containing foreign contacts, financial information, and psychological evaluations for security clearance holders, which are relevant to FBI investigations.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":84,"name":"Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)","slug":"federal-bureau-of-investigation-fbi","type":"institution"}},{"id":18664,"relationshipType":"potential administrative connection","description":"Merit Systems Protection Board security clearance revocation decisions for NSA contractor personnel may provide public records about NSA operations.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2020","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":86,"name":"National Security Agency (NSA)","slug":"national-security-agency-nsa","type":"institution"}},{"id":16966,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"Federal personnel data integration for contractors like Palantir is more likely governed by FISMA compliance requirements and OMB memoranda rather than OPM-specific investigative standards.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":906,"name":"Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)","slug":"cybersecurity-and-infrastructure-security-agency-cisa","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":15596,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"AAS generated over $16 billion in FY2023 for GSA, which includes providing acquisition services to agencies like OPM.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4153,"name":"Office of Assisted Acquisition Services (AAS)","slug":"office-of-assisted-acquisition-services-aas","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":13116,"relationshipType":"indirect constituent impact","description":"Her vote to end the 43-day government shutdown on Nov 12, 2025 was motivated partly by furloughed federal workers in her district.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10883,"name":"Marie Gluesenkamp Perez","slug":"congress-g000600","type":"person"}},{"id":13018,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"Downing voted on legislation affecting federal workforce policies. No direct documented interaction with OPM.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10854,"name":"Troy Downing","slug":"congress-d000634","type":"person"}},{"id":12964,"relationshipType":"Fringe Alignment Mention","description":"OPM appears in the database under the 'Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)' cluster, but there is no documented direct connection to Mannion. Included for search context only.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":10838,"name":"John W. Mannion","slug":"congress-m001231","type":"person"}},{"id":12498,"relationshipType":"affiliation","description":"OPM appears alongside IRS in the known entities list, both being federal agencies under the same branch of government, suggesting potential inter-agency coordination.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":93,"name":"Internal Revenue Service (IRS)","slug":"internal-revenue-service-irs","type":"institution"}},{"id":12497,"relationshipType":"affiliation","description":"OPM appears in the same list of entities as DOGE, suggesting a potential government management or efficiency coordination relationship.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":91,"name":"Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)","slug":"department-of-government-efficiency-doge","type":"instrument"}},{"id":9938,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"OPM would likely fall under the subcommittee's purview for government efficiency oversight as a key federal HR agency","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2024","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":2283,"name":"House Delivering on Government Efficiency subcommittee","slug":"house-delivering-on-government-efficiency-subcommittee","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":531,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"As the federal agency managing 2.1 million civilian employees, OPM's workforce data and personnel systems would be a primary target for DOGE's stated mission of reducing federal workforce and government efficiency reforms","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":91,"name":"Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)","slug":"department-of-government-efficiency-doge","type":"instrument"}},{"id":527,"relationshipType":"operational_target","description":"DOGE's government efficiency mandate directly involves workforce reduction efforts that intersect with OPM's role as the federal personnel agency. SEC filings mentioning DOGE likely relate to contractor impacts from these personnel actions.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2025","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":91,"name":"Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)","slug":"department-of-government-efficiency-doge","type":"instrument"}},{"id":102350,"relationshipType":"infrastructure_platform","description":"OPM's post-2015 breach data governance framework for contractor-managed systems incorporates Palantir Foundry for managing integrated personnel data and background investigation records.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4559,"name":"Foundry","slug":"foundry","type":"instrument"}},{"id":93480,"relationshipType":"inter-agency_transfer_recipient","description":"OPM's National Background Investigations Bureau was transferred to the Defense Department in 2021, bifurcating the federal personnel data system.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":94,"name":"US Department of Defense (Pentagon)","slug":"us-department-of-defense-pentagon","type":"institution"}},{"id":20855,"relationshipType":"attributed perpetrator of breach","description":"The 2015 OPM data breach exposing 21.5 million individuals' SF-86 data and fingerprints was widely attributed to Chinese state-linked hackers.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2015","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":36198,"name":"China","slug":"china","type":"institution"}},{"id":16965,"relationshipType":"procurement_vehicle","description":"Federal agency code 2400 should be used in USASpending searches to capture OPM contracting activity rather than text-based searches.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":610,"name":"Federal Procurement Data System","slug":"federal-procurement-data-system","type":"institution"}},{"id":16964,"relationshipType":"data_absence","description":"No USASpending contracts found for 'Office of Personnel Management (OPM)' in public databases as of 2026-04-07, suggesting procurement visibility gaps.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":462,"name":"USASpending.gov","slug":"usaspending-gov","type":"institution"}},{"id":16404,"relationshipType":"audit_coverage","description":"No publicly available GAO report has evaluated whether OPM's integrated data system with Palantir meets investigative standards, creating a compliance blind spot.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":611,"name":"Government Accountability Office","slug":"government-accountability-office","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":16403,"relationshipType":"services_transfer","description":"OPM's background investigation services were transferred to the Defense Department in 2021.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":94,"name":"US Department of Defense (Pentagon)","slug":"us-department-of-defense-pentagon","type":"institution"}},{"id":16402,"relationshipType":"contractor","description":"OPM is a Palantir client; OPM's federal personnel data systems are managed through infrastructure built by Palantir.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2020","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":17,"name":"Palantir Technologies","slug":"palantir-technologies","type":"company"}},{"id":13607,"relationshipType":"filing with agency","description":"Daniel Webster filed a filing with the SEC on 2010-08-12, Accession number N/A.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2010","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":11110,"name":"Daniel Webster","slug":"congress-w000806","type":"person"}},{"id":10194,"relationshipType":"administrative_coordination","description":"DCSA coordinates with OPM on personnel security clearance processes and background investigations for federal employees","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2019","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":904,"name":"Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA)","slug":"defense-counterintelligence-and-security-agency-dcsa","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":9960,"relationshipType":"oversight","description":"Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has oversight jurisdiction over federal personnel management and OPM operations","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":2266,"name":"Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee","slug":"senate-homeland-security-and-governmental-affairs-committee","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":102351,"relationshipType":"shared_regulatory_impact","description":"The transfer of OPM's background investigation oversight to DCSA created a systemic compliance gap for CMS, affecting security clearance reliability for contractors (specifically Palantir) who integrate OPM data.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2021","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":118567,"name":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)","slug":"centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services-cms","type":"government_agency"}}],"contradictions":[],"permalink":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/office-of-personnel-management-opm","timelineUrl":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/office-of-personnel-management-opm/timeline"}