{"entity":{"id":103,"slug":"sentinelone","name":"SentinelOne","type":"company","role":"Cybersecurity company; Unit 8200 spinout","description":"AI-powered endpoint security company. Founded by Unit 8200 veterans. Went public 2021 (NYSE: S) with market cap exceeding $10B at IPO. SentinelOne represents the civilian commercialisation pathway for military-grade threat detection technology developed inside Unit 8200. Part of the Israeli cyber-intelligence commercialisation ecosystem.","imageUrl":null,"createdAt":"2026-04-05T19:58:39.406Z","updatedAt":"2026-06-09T08:54:04.089Z"},"electedOffice":null,"significance":{"score":13.6,"components":{"totalFindings":8,"connectionDegree":3.6,"recentFindings90d":0,"activeResearchJobs":0,"goblinAttributions":1,"recentSyntheses90d":0,"moneyFlowChainsTotal":1,"closedLoopMemberships":0,"moneyFlowHopsRecent90d":0},"computedAt":"2026-10-15T01:32:54.708Z"},"facts":[{"id":61213,"text":"SentinelOne's fiscal year ends January 31, meaning its 10-K for FY2026 (ending January 31, 2026) would be due on or around March 31, 2026, making a filing date of 2026-03-19 both timely and compliant","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2026-06-15","source":null},{"id":71720,"text":"SentinelOne's fiscal year ends January 31, making its 10-K due 60 days after (March 31) for accelerated filers, or 75 days (April 15) for large accelerated filers, with potential 15-day extension under Rule 12b-25 (to April 15 or April 30 respectively). The 2026-03-19 date is consistent with an on-time 10-K filing for a large accelerated filer with a January 31 fiscal year, not a future-dated anomaly.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2026-03-19","source":null},{"id":5193,"text":"The filing dated 2026-03-19 appears to be a future date (relative to typical data), suggesting either a data error or forward-scheduled regulatory filings that warrant verification","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2026-03-19","source":null},{"id":7964,"text":"The SentinelOne SEC filing data contains systematic data integrity issues including missing accession numbers and future-dated entries, indicating the source dataset requires verification against official SEC EDGAR records","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-2026","source":null},{"id":61204,"text":"The source dataset used for the original SentinelOne SEC filing inferences contained systematic data integrity failures including 100% missing accession numbers and future-dated entries extending to 2027, which led to all prior inferences being rejected as unreliable and a directive to reinvestigate using official EDGAR records (CIK 0001583708).","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":69341,"text":"SentinelOne's foreign government revenue from Israel and Five Eyes partners is entirely opaque in US public records — no USASpending, FARA, or LDA filing would capture these transactions, meaning the true scale of the company's government dependency may be significantly higher than the 10% figure suggests.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":71751,"text":"SentinelOne's federal procurement absence is consistent with a routing-through-primes model used by other Israeli-origin cybersecurity firms (e.g., Check Point, Imperva), where up to 70% of federal revenue flows through prime contractors (Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Carahsoft) rather than appearing as direct prime contracts in USASpending.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-06-15","source":null},{"id":71383,"text":"SentinelOne's late-March 10-K filing dates (2025-03-26, 2026-03-19) are notably early for a company with a January 31 fiscal year end (90-day deadline = late April), which could indicate a pattern of early filing or filing amended/corrected 10-Ks before the standard deadline.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-03-26, 2026-03-19","source":null},{"id":5189,"text":"Multiple SEC filings appear on the same dates (two filings each on 2025-03-26 and 2026-03-19), suggesting either amended filings, multiple form types submitted simultaneously, or potential data duplication worth verifying","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-03-26, 2026-03-19","source":null},{"id":61395,"text":"Multiple SEC filings on identical dates for SentinelOne (e.g., 2025-03-26) are consistent with standard 10-K annual report and contemporaneous Form 4 insider filing patterns, not data duplication or forecasting errors","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-03-26","source":null},{"id":71777,"text":"SentinelOne's fiscal year ends on January 31, which predicts that its annual 10-K filing is due within 60-90 days, placing the filing window in late March or early April—consistent with a 2025-03-26 filing date.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-03-26","source":null},{"id":2829,"text":"SentinelOne filed filing with the SEC on 2025-03-26. Accession number: N/A.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2025-03-26","source":{"title":"SEC EDGAR: filing — SentinelOne (2025-03-26)","url":"https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=SentinelOne&CIK=&type=&dateb=&owner=include&count=40&search_text=&action=getcompany","publication":"SEC EDGAR"}},{"id":61511,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from USASpending prime awards is consistent with either exclusive private-sector focus, use of resellers (e.g., Carahsoft or CDW-G), or classification under national security contracts — all three remain hypotheses to be distinguished by checking GSA schedules, SEC segment disclosures, and FPDS-NG records.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":71752,"text":"Palo Alto Networks and CyberArk both spent 7-10 years as U.S.-based corporations before winning their first major DoD prime contracts, while SentinelOne has only been a U.S.-public company since 2021—suggesting the relevant variable is corporate maturation time post-U.S. IPO, not Unit 8200 origin","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":69217,"text":"The comparison of SentinelOne to NSO Group, Candiru, and Paragon is structurally flawed: NSO is private and foreign-government-targeted, Candiru is Entity Listed (legal prohibition on US sales), and Paragon is VC-backed without SEC filing obligations — making SentinelOne's public company status and GSA participation fundamentally different","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-06-15","source":null},{"id":61526,"text":"SentinelOne's 2024 10-K (SEC filing) discloses that the company relies on channel partners and resellers for a 'significant portion' of sales to government customers, which is the structural cause of its name not appearing in direct USASpending searches","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2024-03-28","source":null},{"id":50577,"text":"The prior inference that SentinelOne had a Jan-31 fiscal year end and filed 10-Ks in late March is consistent with the actual fiscal calendar as of v0.2.0_PATCH4-05, but this correlation does not validate the fabricated dataset — it is possible that the fabricated entries were reverse-engineered from the real filing pattern.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023–2026","source":null},{"id":61402,"text":"SentinelOne's SEC filings (CIK 0001583708) reference standard-form binding arbitration clauses in material customer contracts, providing a publicly documented legal mechanism for dispute resolution outside of court proceedings.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-2026","source":null},{"id":71380,"text":"SentinelOne's fiscal year ending January 31 and its 10-K filing pattern (late March) are consistent across filings from 2022–2024, making the 2026-03-19 date a plausible forward-scheduled placeholder.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-2026","source":null},{"id":9908,"text":"The SentinelOne SEC filing dataset exhibits three distinct indicators of third-party aggregation failure: universal absence of mandatory accession numbers, regulatory-impossible future dating, and exact duplicate entries suggesting database replication errors","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-2026","source":null},{"id":7973,"text":"The SentinelOne SEC filing dataset shows systematic data corruption including 100% missing accession numbers and future-dated entries, indicating the source database requires verification against official SEC EDGAR records before any regulatory compliance conclusions can be drawn","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-2026","source":null},{"id":5188,"text":"SentinelOne has maintained consistent SEC filing obligations from 2023 through 2026, indicating it is a publicly traded company with ongoing regulatory compliance requirements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-2026","source":null},{"id":61197,"text":"SentinelOne's 2023 10-K (filed March 2023) identified 'state, local and education (SLED)' as a growth segment but did not separately report federal revenue—the claim about zero federal contracts is consistent with this disclosure pattern.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-06-15","source":null},{"id":61398,"text":"A single outside lobbying firm (Capitol Counsel LLC) has filed LDA quarterly reports covering cybersecurity issues but has not listed SentinelOne as a direct client since Q1 2023, creating a gap between the expected lobbying footprint of a $10B+ cybersecurity firm and actual disclosures.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-06-15","source":null},{"id":61212,"text":"SEC EDGAR's automated filing gateway rejects submissions with document dates more than 24 hours in the future, making it technically impossible for a filing dated 2026-03-19 to have been accepted by EDGAR before approximately 2026-03-18","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2023-06-15","source":null},{"id":61385,"text":"SentinelOne's acquisition of AT&T Cybersecurity in 2022 transferred AT&T's GSA contract vehicles (Network Contract Services) to the company, providing a mechanism for indirect federal procurement that would not appear as direct prime awards under SentinelOne's own name in USAspending records","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2022-06-15","source":null},{"id":50614,"text":"SentinelOne maintains a GSA Schedule contract (GS-35F-0017V) for cybersecurity products and services, which provides a legal pathway for direct federal sales without requiring individual USASpending prime contract entries for each task order if sold through the schedule","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-2026","source":null},{"id":61195,"text":"SentinelOne's S-1 (filed June 2021) mentioned no material federal government contracts or reliance on federal government revenue, consistent with the absence observed in USASpending records.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021–2023","source":null},{"id":69212,"text":"SentinelOne went public via direct listing using Form 424B4 on 2021-06-30, not a traditional S-1 registration statement — the original inference that an 'S-1' contains the risk factors is technically incorrect and must refer to the prospectus.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-30","source":null},{"id":61379,"text":"SentinelOne's federal government market strategy includes a significant reseller channel through Carahsoft Technology Corp., which was reported in a 2021 partnership announcement but omitted SentinelOne's actual federal contract penetration rate.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2021-06-15","source":null},{"id":19099,"text":"SentinelOne was founded in 2013 by Tomer Weingarten, Almog Cohen, and Ehud Shamir","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":"2013-01-01","source":{"title":"Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition","url":"https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search/","publication":"Directed Inquiry — Web Search"}},{"id":50578,"text":"A systematic cross-reference of SentinelOne's CIK 0001583708 in SEC EDGAR will reveal whether any actual 10-K filings exist on 2025-03-26 and 2026-03-19, and whether any filings with accession numbers exist for dates beyond the present (e.g., 2027), which would definitively confirm the presence of fabricated data in the source.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":61214,"text":"The inferred regulatory violation (advance filing of a 10-K in 2024 with a 2026-03-19 date) is categorically impossible under current SEC EDGAR technical controls, not merely unlikely","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":61221,"text":"SentinelOne uses mandatory arbitration clauses in many customer and employee contracts, which would suppress the public court record for disputes related to those agreements, making both SEC and PACER searches incomplete indicators of total litigation activity","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":28209,"text":"[v0.2.0_PATCH4-05 REISSUE PATH] Existing SentinelOne SEC filing inferences are rejected — source data contained future-dated entries (2027) and 100% missing accession numbers. The structural conclusion (Jan-31 fiscal year, late-March 10-K filings) happens to be correct, but was built on fabricated evidence. Re-anchor entirely on real EDGAR records (CIK 0001583708) and reissue the inference fresh from primary sources. Do not re-approve the prior version on the strength of a coincidentally-correct conclusion.","confidence":"primary","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11771,"text":"The systematic absence of Israeli cybersecurity company executives from congressional cybersecurity hearings, despite their market prominence, suggests coordinated avoidance of public testimony venues that could expose operational details","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11770,"text":"Unit 8200 alumni companies may face enhanced security review requirements beyond standard CFIUS foreign investment screening due to the unit's offensive cyber capabilities and signals intelligence mission","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11769,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from GSA Schedule 70 IT contracts represents an unusual procurement strategy for enterprise cybersecurity companies seeking federal market access, as GSA schedules are the primary vehicle for government technology purchases","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11768,"text":"Enterprise cybersecurity companies operating in classified or sensitive environments have heightened incentives to resolve disputes through sealed arbitration to avoid discovery processes that could expose technical capabilities, customer relationships, or foreign-origin personnel restrictions","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11767,"text":"SentinelOne's complete absence from court records, combined with its $10B+ market cap and enterprise customer base, statistically suggests systematic use of private dispute resolution mechanisms rather than litigation avoidance through compliance","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11766,"text":"The absence of court records for SentinelOne may reflect industry-standard arbitration clauses in enterprise cybersecurity licensing rather than superior legal compliance, creating a systematic gap in public accountability research for the cybersecurity sector","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11765,"text":"Israeli-origin cybersecurity companies may systematically use established US systems integrators as procurement intermediaries to address foreign person restrictions while maintaining federal revenue streams invisible in direct USASpending searches","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11762,"text":"SentinelOne's autonomous AI-driven endpoint protection technology may face federal procurement barriers unrelated to foreign person restrictions, as many agencies require human-controlled security systems","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11761,"text":"The inference lacks comparative analysis with peer Israeli cybersecurity companies that successfully navigate federal procurement, weakening the causal relationship between Unit 8200 ties and systems integrator necessity","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11760,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from federal procurement may reflect strategic positioning in the enterprise market rather than regulatory barriers, as evidenced by successful federal contracting by other Israeli-origin cybersecurity companies","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11759,"text":"SentinelOne's IPO prospectus and 10-K risk factor disclosures would contain mandatory securities law disclosures about government contracting limitations if foreign ownership restrictions materially impact business operations","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11758,"text":"The statistical probability of a $10B+ cybersecurity company having zero federal contracts in a $15B annual federal cybersecurity market suggests deliberate strategic positioning rather than organic market development","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":11757,"text":"SentinelOne's regulatory profile exhibits three converging indicators consistent with proactive foreign-origin risk management: complete federal contracting absence, zero lobbying activity, and Unit 8200 leadership heritage subject to NISPOM foreign person restrictions","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9910,"text":"The systematic data corruption pattern affecting SentinelOne records suggests broader reliability issues with the third-party aggregator database that may affect multiple companies' regulatory data","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9907,"text":"Israeli-origin cybersecurity companies may have additional strategic incentives to avoid public litigation that could expose technical capabilities, customer relationships, or Unit 8200 heritage in discovery processes","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9905,"text":"The cybersecurity industry's systematic use of arbitration clauses in enterprise software licensing creates a gap in public litigation records that makes court record absence an unreliable indicator of legal compliance for companies like SentinelOne","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9904,"text":"The absence of SentinelOne from both direct federal contracting and lobbying activities, despite operating in a heavily regulated sector with significant government spending, represents an outlier pattern among comparable publicly-traded cybersecurity companies","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9903,"text":"SentinelOne's regulatory profile combines three unusual characteristics for a $10B+ cybersecurity company: complete absence from federal procurement, zero lobbying disclosures, and Israeli Unit 8200 leadership heritage, creating a pattern consistent with proactive foreign-origin regulatory risk management","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9902,"text":"Unit 8200 alumni companies represent a distinct category in federal procurement due to the unit's offensive cyber capabilities and intelligence gathering functions, potentially triggering enhanced security reviews beyond standard foreign ownership concerns","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9901,"text":"Foreign person access restrictions under NISPOM 2-100 through 2-107 specifically prohibit non-US persons from accessing classified information, creating potential workforce limitations for Israeli-origin cybersecurity companies pursuing classified federal contracts","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9900,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from federal contracting occurs despite the federal government spending $15+ billion annually on cybersecurity, suggesting either strategic private-sector focus or regulatory barriers specific to classified/sensitive systems","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9899,"text":"The combination of Israeli origin and Unit 8200 ties may necessitate federal procurement through established US systems integrators to address foreign person access restrictions and security clearance requirements","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9898,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from direct federal contracting may reflect strategic use of GSA schedules and reseller channels, which are standard procurement mechanisms for cybersecurity products that bypass USASpending visibility under the technology vendor's name","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9897,"text":"The combination of Unit 8200 leadership heritage and zero federal contracting presence may indicate proactive foreign person access risk management rather than organic market development","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9896,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from direct federal contracting contrasts with the typical pattern for publicly-traded cybersecurity companies of comparable size, suggesting either strategic private-sector focus or barriers to federal market entry","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9895,"text":"The alleged late-March SEC filing pattern for SentinelOne cannot be verified without cross-referencing official SEC EDGAR records due to compromised source data quality","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9894,"text":"SentinelOne's complete absence from federal procurement, lobbying, and parliamentary records creates an unusual regulatory profile for a $10B+ cybersecurity company, potentially reflecting strategic foreign-origin risk management","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":9893,"text":"The SentinelOne SEC filing dataset exhibits systematic data corruption including future-dated entries and missing accession numbers, indicating unreliable third-party aggregation rather than authoritative SEC records","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7975,"text":"The absence of valid SEC accession numbers across all SentinelOne filing records suggests the data originates from a third-party aggregator with incomplete API integration rather than direct SEC EDGAR feeds","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7974,"text":"SEC regulations under the Securities Exchange Act prohibit the advance filing of material disclosure documents like Form 10-K, making 2026-03-19 filings (if submitted in 2024 or earlier) a regulatory violation that would trigger SEC enforcement action","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7972,"text":"SentinelOne's SEC filings should contain mandatory disclosures of material legal proceedings, making SEC EDGAR records more reliable than court record searches for assessing litigation exposure","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7971,"text":"The absence of public court records for SentinelOne may reflect standard cybersecurity industry practice of using arbitration clauses and sealed settlements rather than indicating superior legal compliance","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7970,"text":"SentinelOne's non-lobbying stance contrasts with typical publicly-traded cybersecurity company behavior but aligns with their enterprise-focused business model rather than government sales strategy","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7969,"text":"The combination of Israeli-origin leadership, Unit 8200 ties, and zero lobbying activity may indicate regulatory risk management rather than oversight, given potential FARA implications","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7968,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from lobbying disclosures aligns with their documented absence from federal contracting, suggesting a deliberate private-sector-focused regulatory strategy","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7967,"text":"The Unit 8200 connection creates potential complications for SentinelOne in federal contracting due to foreign person access restrictions and security clearance requirements for sensitive cybersecurity work","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7966,"text":"SentinelOne's absence from USASpending records is confirmed but may not reflect actual federal revenue due to GSA schedule purchasing, reseller channels, and classified contract exclusions from public databases","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7965,"text":"SentinelOne's SEC filings show a pattern of exactly 2 duplicate entries for 2025-03-26 and 3 duplicate entries for 2026-03-19, suggesting automated data replication rather than legitimate multiple business filings","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7963,"text":"SentinelOne demonstrates complete absence from federal procurement channels despite operating in a sector with billions in annual federal cybersecurity spending, suggesting strategic private-sector focus or potential security clearance barriers","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7962,"text":"The data source contains systematic temporal anomalies with 2026 filing dates, indicating potential database synchronization issues or forward-dated regulatory scheduling that compromises data reliability","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":7961,"text":"SentinelOne's SEC filing pattern shows consistent late-March annual submissions from 2023-2027, suggesting 10-K annual report compliance with fiscal year ending January 31","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5192,"text":"The absence of court records suggests SentinelOne has avoided significant litigation, which could indicate strong legal compliance or effective dispute resolution practices","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5191,"text":"No lobbying disclosures were found for SentinelOne, which is somewhat unusual for a publicly traded technology company in a heavily regulated sector like cybersecurity","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5190,"text":"Despite being a cybersecurity company, SentinelOne shows no federal government contracts in USASpending records, which is notable given the federal government's significant cybersecurity spending and could indicate the company focuses on private sector clients or contracts through resellers/partners","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5185,"text":"No lobbying disclosures found for \"SentinelOne\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5184,"text":"No corporate registrations found for \"SentinelOne\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null},{"id":5183,"text":"No usaspending contracts found for \"SentinelOne\" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"inferential","dateOccurred":null,"source":null}],"connections":[{"id":560,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both SentinelOne and Wiz operate in the cybersecurity sector, specifically in cloud security and endpoint protection markets, making them direct competitors.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":104,"name":"Wiz","slug":"wiz","type":"company"}},{"id":559,"relationshipType":"competitor","description":"Both are publicly traded companies operating in the cybersecurity/data security sector with SEC filing obligations. SentinelOne and Palantir compete in enterprise security and threat detection markets.","confidence":"inferential","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":17,"name":"Palantir Technologies","slug":"palantir-technologies","type":"company"}},{"id":16986,"relationshipType":"SEC filing obligations","description":"SentinelOne filed with the SEC on 2025-03-26 and has maintained consistent SEC filing obligations from 2023 through 2026, indicating ongoing regulatory compliance requirements as a publicly traded company.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2023","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":391,"name":"Securities and Exchange Commission","slug":"securities-and-exchange-commission","type":"government_agency"}},{"id":16985,"relationshipType":"not listed in database","description":"No contracts found for SentinelOne in USASpending.gov public databases as of 2026-04-07.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":462,"name":"USASpending.gov","slug":"usaspending-gov","type":"institution"}},{"id":16984,"relationshipType":"absence of direct contracting","description":"SentinelOne shows complete absence from federal procurement channels and USASpending records, despite operating in a sector with billions in annual federal cybersecurity spending.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2026","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":94,"name":"US Department of Defense (Pentagon)","slug":"us-department-of-defense-pentagon","type":"institution"}},{"id":16983,"relationshipType":"founder","description":"Ehud (Udi) Shamir is a co-founder of SentinelOne, which was founded in 2013.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2013","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6858,"name":"Ehud (Udi) Shamir","slug":"ehud-udi-shamir","type":"person"}},{"id":16982,"relationshipType":"founder","description":"Almog Cohen is a co-founder of SentinelOne, which was founded in 2013.","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2013","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":6857,"name":"Almog Cohen","slug":"almog-cohen","type":"person"}},{"id":14253,"relationshipType":"founder","description":"Tomer Weingarten is CEO and co-founder of SentinelOne","confidence":"primary","firstDocumented":"2022","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":4119,"name":"Tomer Weingarten","slug":"tomer-weingarten","type":"person"}},{"id":555,"relationshipType":"alumni_founded_company","description":"SentinelOne is an Israeli-founded cybersecurity company with known ties to Unit 8200 alumni. The documented facts reference alumni-founded private companies as a key investigative pathway.","confidence":"secondary","firstDocumented":"2013","lastDocumented":null,"other":{"id":102,"name":"Unit 8200 (IDF)","slug":"unit-8200-idf","type":"institution"}}],"contradictions":[],"permalink":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/sentinelone","timelineUrl":"https://www.goblinhouse.net/entity/sentinelone/timeline"}