[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Suzanne Bonamici

Suzanne Bonamici

Democratic · Representative, OR ·1

Suzanne Bonamici is the Democratic U.S. Representative (OR's 1st congressional district). The platform has 7 voting records on file (2025-2026) and 64 verified facts on file covering this member's voting positions, financial disclosures, and stated platform commitments.

Score Components
52 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
85 → 17
Donor Influence 15%
32 → 5
Silence Risk 25%
31 → 8
Contradiction Risk 25%
40 → 10
Intelligence Volume 15%
80 → 12
Constituency Deviation 0%
12 → 0
Voting Misalignment 0%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
OR‑01 has only 12 % of Oregon's total SNAP participants — the lowest share of any Oregon congressional district — despite Bonamici's role as the lead House sponsor of the Senior Hunger Prevention Act. Her SNAP advocacy is grounded in progressive principle and state‑level concern rather than acute district‑level need, distinguishing her from colleagues whose SNAP votes track closely with district poverty rates.
secondary · 2025-06-03 ✓ Verified
Bonamici co‑introduced the bicameral Senior Hunger Prevention Act of 2026 (H.R. 8256) on April 14, 2026, to increase the minimum monthly SNAP benefit, eliminate administrative hurdles for seniors, and expand SNAP food delivery options. She introduced this bill sixteen days before voting against the Farm Bill that locked in the OBBBA's $187 billion SNAP cuts.
primary · 2026-04-14 ✓ Verified
Bonamici disclosed during the May 22, 2025 floor debate that she personally relied on SNAP as a college student: 'Access to food stamps when I was in college helped me complete my education, and without that critical nutrition assistance it's likely that I would not be a Member of Congress today.' Her estimated net worth in 2026 was $10.4 million (104th highest in Congress).
primary · 2025-05-22 ✓ Verified
Bonamici also voted Nay on the initial House passage of H.R. 1 (May 22, 2025, Roll Call 140), which passed 215‑214 with all Democrats opposing. Her July 3 press release explicitly compared the two versions, calling the Senate version 'even worse.' This establishes a two‑vote opposition chain.
primary · 2025-05-22 ✓ Verified
Bonamici voted No on Roll Call 190 (H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, concurrence in Senate amendment) on July 3, 2025. The House Clerk's official record confirms 'Bonamici | Democratic | OR | No.' The vote passed 218‑214 with 218 Republican Ayes, 2 Republican Nays (Massie and Roy), 212 Democratic Nays, and zero Democratic Ayes. The vote is confirmed at primary confidence.
primary · 2025-07-03 ✓ Verified
Bonamici subsequently honored the Resist.bot constituent demand by voting Nay on the DHS Appropriations Act (March 5, 2026) and Nay on the disposition of the Senate amendment to H.R. 7147 (March 27, 2026)—both votes opposing DHS/ICE funding—creating a documented chain from the January 22, 2025 constituent petition through multiple recorded votes opposing immigration enforcement appropriations.
primary · 2026-03-27 ✓ Verified
The Laken Riley Act vote created a three-way split in Oregon's House delegation: Bonamici, Dexter, and Salinas voted Nay (progressives); Hoyle and Bynum voted Yea (moderates facing competitive reelection campaigns); and Bentz voted Yea (Republican). This was the only vote during the first week of the 119th Congress that separated Oregon's progressive and centrist Democrats, with Hoyle explicitly telling KLCC that…
[ Show full fact ]
The Laken Riley Act vote created a three-way split in Oregon's House delegation: Bonamici, Dexter, and Salinas voted Nay (progressives); Hoyle and Bynum voted Yea (moderates facing competitive reelection campaigns); and Bentz voted Yea (Republican). This was the only vote during the first week of the 119th Congress that separated Oregon's progressive and centrist Democrats, with Hoyle explicitly telling KLCC that she 'came here to represent my constituents' who are 'rightly concerned about public safety' and 'immigration.'
primary · 2025-01-08 ✓ Verified
Bonamici's immigration advocacy escalated significantly over the course of 2025: from a quiet Nay vote in January, to co-signing letters demanding the release of detained Oregonians by October, to declaring on her campaign website in November that 'ICE is out of control' and that she 'will not sit by while anyone is unfairly or illegally targeted by ICE or Trump's Justice Department'—an arc of escalating public…
[ Show full fact ]
Bonamici's immigration advocacy escalated significantly over the course of 2025: from a quiet Nay vote in January, to co-signing letters demanding the release of detained Oregonians by October, to declaring on her campaign website in November that 'ICE is out of control' and that she 'will not sit by while anyone is unfairly or illegally targeted by ICE or Trump's Justice Department'—an arc of escalating public activism following the Laken Riley Act's passage and enforcement.
primary · 2025-11-14 ✓ Verified
Indivisible Oregon's January 9, 2025 action alert explicitly urged constituents to 'Thank Reps. Bonamici, Dexter, and Salinas for sticking up for immigrant families and opposing this mean-spirited unconstitutional legislation' while simultaneously directing them to 'castigate Reps. Hoyle and Bynum for their hypocrisy'—creating a documented progressive activist scorecard dividing Oregon's congressional delegation…
[ Show full fact ]
Indivisible Oregon's January 9, 2025 action alert explicitly urged constituents to 'Thank Reps. Bonamici, Dexter, and Salinas for sticking up for immigrant families and opposing this mean-spirited unconstitutional legislation' while simultaneously directing them to 'castigate Reps. Hoyle and Bynum for their hypocrisy'—creating a documented progressive activist scorecard dividing Oregon's congressional delegation into allies and betrayers on immigration enforcement.
primary · 2025-01-09 ✓ Verified
Bonamici issued no press release or public statement about her Laken Riley Act vote, in marked contrast to Rep. Val Hoyle (OR-04) who explained her Yes vote in a January 7 press release, and to Bonamici's own high-visibility leadership opposing the transgender athlete ban (H.R. 28) just one week later where she branded the bill the 'Child Predator Empowerment Act' on the House floor.
primary · 2025-01-07 ✓ Verified
Suzanne Bonamici voted Nay on H.R. 29, the Laken Riley Act, Roll Call 6, January 7, 2025—the bill passed 264-159 with 48 Democrats joining all 216 Republicans, and Bonamici was among the 159 Democratic Nay votes.
primary · 2025-01-07 ✓ Verified
Oregon has the second-highest SNAP participation rate in the nation at 18.1% (approximately 775,000 people), and it is one of only three states to achieve 100% enrollment of eligible SNAP households—meaning Bonamici's Senior Hunger Prevention Act would reduce administrative barriers in a state that already excels at enrolling eligible recipients.
secondary · 2025-11-12 ✓ Verified
Bonamici's district (OR-01) has only 12% of Oregon's SNAP participants—the lowest share of any Oregon congressional district—despite her role as the lead House sponsor of the Senior Hunger Prevention Act, meaning her SNAP advocacy is grounded in progressive principle and state-level concern rather than acute district-level need.
secondary · 2025-06-03 ✓ Verified
H.R. 7567 codified—rather than reversed—the $187 billion in SNAP cuts that had already been enacted through H.R. 1 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act) in July 2025. The Food Research and Action Center confirmed the bill 'fails to reverse the unprecedented $187 billion cut to SNAP enacted through the budget reconciliation law, H.R. 1.' Bonamici had also voted Nay on H.R. 1 twice (May 22 and July 3, 2025), making H.R…
[ Show full fact ]
H.R. 7567 codified—rather than reversed—the $187 billion in SNAP cuts that had already been enacted through H.R. 1 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act) in July 2025. The Food Research and Action Center confirmed the bill 'fails to reverse the unprecedented $187 billion cut to SNAP enacted through the budget reconciliation law, H.R. 1.' Bonamici had also voted Nay on H.R. 1 twice (May 22 and July 3, 2025), making H.R. 7567 her third consecutive vote opposing the largest food assistance cut in American history.
secondary · 2026-04-30 ✓ Verified
Bonamici disclosed during floor debate on May 22, 2025 that she personally relied on SNAP as a college student: 'Access to food stamps when I was in college helped me complete my education, and without that critical nutrition assistance it's likely that I would not be a Member of Congress today'—a rare autobiographical admission from a member whose net worth was estimated at $10.4 million in 2026.
primary · 2025-05-22 ✓ Verified
Bonamici co-introduced the bicameral Senior Hunger Prevention Act of 2026 (H.R. 8256) on April 14, 2026—just sixteen days before the Farm Bill vote—to 'eliminate unnecessary administrative hurdles to make it easier for seniors to receive SNAP benefits,' increase the minimum monthly SNAP benefit for all participants, and expand SNAP food delivery options.
primary · 2026-04-14 ✓ Verified
Suzanne Bonamici voted Nay on H.R. 7567, the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, on April 30, 2026—the bill passed 224-200 with 209 Republicans, 14 Democrats, and one Independent voting Yea; 197 Democrats and 3 Republicans voted Nay.
primary · 2026-04-30 ✓ Verified
Bonamici was one of only 20 House Democrats who voted against overriding Trump's 2021 NDAA veto, placing her in the most progressive anti-military-spending faction of the Democratic caucus—a documented career position that makes her 2025 Nay votes fully consistent with her multi-year legislative record rather than a newsworthy departure.
primary · 2020-12-29 ✓ Verified
The AFL-CIO's position on the two NDAA votes differed: it supported the September rule and final bill (because Section 1110 restored collective bargaining), but opposed the December rule (because Section 1110 was stripped). Bonamici voted with the AFL-CIO position both times, giving her a 100% AFL-CIO score for 2025 alongside Oregon's four other Democratic Representatives.
primary · 2026-04-17 ✓ Verified
The original claim contains two date/bill errors: (1) the correct rule vote dates are September 9 (H.R. 3838, H.Res. 682) and December 10 (S. 1071, H.Res. 936), not September 17; (2) S. 1071 was the December compromise bill, not the September bill. September 17, 2025 corresponds to no recorded NDAA rule vote.
primary · 2025-09-17 ✓ Verified
Andrea Salinas Shared Advocacy Indivisible Oregon urged constituents to thank both Bonamici and Salinas for opposing Laken Riley Act
Intel Corporation donor Contributed $82,552 to Bonamici's campaigns and is a major employer in her district
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Legislative Opposition Voted against DHS funding that included ICE appropriations; stated 'ICE is out of control' on campaign website; voted against Laken Riley Act mandating ICE…
Ron Wyden colleague Fellow member of Congress from Oregon in the House of Representatives.
Rosa L. DeLauro collaboration Co-introduced the CHARTER Act in April 2026 with Reps. DeLauro and Grijalva
Adelita S. Grijalva collaboration Co-introduced the CHARTER Act in April 2026 with Reps. DeLauro and Grijalva
Maxine Dexter Shared Advocacy Indivisible Oregon urged constituents to thank both Bonamici and Dexter for opposing Laken Riley Act
Val T. Hoyle Policy Difference Unlike Bonamici's opposition, Hoyle voted Yes on Laken Riley Act and issued a press release explaining her support
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Legislative Opposition Voted against DHS appropriations including CBP funding
Janelle S. Bynum Policy Difference Indivisible Oregon directed constituents to 'castigate' Bynum for supporting Laken Riley Act, contrasting with Bonamici's opposition
Stand With Crypto Alliance Political Rating Rated Bonamici 'Strongly Against Crypto' based on her votes against crypto regulatory bills CLARITY Act and GENIUS Act
Quiver Quantitative Financial Tracking Estimated Bonamici's 2026 net worth at $10.4M, ranked 104th highest in Congress
Thomas Massie Voting Alignment Both voted Nay on H.Res. 936 (NDAA rule) on December 10, 2025 - Massie was the only Republican voting Nay, Bonamici was among all Democrats voting Nay
AIPAC / United Democracy Project donor Bonamici received contributions from AIPAC conduit donors; she is listed among seven Democrats who AIPAC 'discourages open disagreement with Israeli…
Elect Democratic Women donor $5,500 to Suzanne Bonamici's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (7 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00685297/
Pge Bipartisan Committee donor $5,000 to Suzanne Bonamici's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (3 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00381020/
American Association Of Nurse Practitioners Political Action Committee donor $10,000 to Suzanne Bonamici's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00358903/
American Seniors Housing Association (Seniors Housing PAC) donor $5,000 to Suzanne Bonamici's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00325332/
Lockheed Martin Corporation Employees' Political Action Committee donor $5,000 to Suzanne Bonamici's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (3 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00303024/
American Association Of Nurse Anesthetists Separate Segregated Fund (Crna-PAC) donor $5,000 to Suzanne Bonamici's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00173153/
BillVoteDateAlignment
PROOF Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Retire through Ownership Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Ratepayer Protection Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Water Resources Development Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
GUARD Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Whistleblower Protection Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act Nay 2026-09-03 unknown
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require… Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Protecting Domestic Mining Act Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
AGOA Extension Act Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
Local Access to Courts Act Yea 2026-08-31 unknown
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 30/100
Platform: "Bonamici supports a ban on congressional stock trading and has publicly advocated for stronger ethics rules, positioning herself as a reformer who wants to 'reinstate trust in our government.'"
Vote: on "Bonamici reported 176 financial transactions worth $1,217,578 to $4,023,470 in her 2018 financial…"
Bonamici campaigns as an advocate for a congressional stock trading ban while personally reporting one of the highest volumes of financial transactions among House members (176 transactions, $1.2M-$4M). However, this is a low-severity contradiction because her support for a ban is precisely about ending the practice…
[ Show full analysis ]
Bonamici campaigns as an advocate for a congressional stock trading ban while personally reporting one of the highest volumes of financial transactions among House members (176 transactions, $1.2M-$4M). However, this is a low-severity contradiction because her support for a ban is precisely about ending the practice she participates in, and she has stated publicly that she is restructuring investments into ETFs and mutual funds. Both sources reference the same policy debate around congressional stock trading.
Last silence detection: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:48:36 GMT (via scheduled run)
Refused to complete Vote Smart's 2024 Political Courage Test — all issue positions were inferred from her public record rather than directly stated
309d silent
Expected position: Candidates for federal office are expected to provide explicit issue positions on key topics to help voters make informed decisions. Vote Smart repeatedly requested responses from Bonamici. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Expected position: Candidates for federal office are expected to provide explicit issue positions on key topics to help voters make informed decisions. Vote Smart repeatedly requested responses from Bonamici. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Bonamici was actively campaigning during this period — raising $933K, hosting town halls in Tillamook County (February 2025), issuing press releases on affordable housing, and engaging on social media. Vote Smart's Political Courage Test page explicitly states: 'Suzanne Bonamici did not provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2024 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.' All issue positions on the test are marked as 'Inferred Position' — Vote Smart derived answers from her voting record and public statements rather than from direct submission. Primary URL: https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/59641/suzanne-bonamici
other / unclassified
Cap-PAC Separate Segregated Fund Of The National Community Action Foundation Inc (amounts: $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
ideological & single-issue
Americans For The Arts Action Fund PAC, Elect Democratic Women (amounts: $6,500 (2024), $5,500 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
corporate pacs, industry unlisted
Avangrid PAC, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. PAC (Aka Greenbrier PAC) (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
Ttm Technologies Inc PAC Technology $5,000 (2026)
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. PAC (Aka Greenbrier PAC) Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $5,000 (2024)
Elect Democratic Women Ideological & single-issue $5,500 (2026)
Americans For The Arts Action Fund PAC Ideological & single-issue $6,500 (2024)
Avangrid PAC Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $5,000 (2024)
Pge Bipartisan Committee Utilities & nuclear $5,000 (2026)
American College Of Nurse-Midwives Midwives-PAC Health care & pharma $7,500 (2026)
American Seniors Housing Association (Seniors Housing PAC) Real estate & construction $5,000 (2026)
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. PAC Health care & pharma $6,000 (2024)
TopicPriorityAlignmentDeviation
Public Lands and Timber Management 78 70 30
Housing Affordability and Homelessness 92 80 20
Cryptocurrency and Financial Regulation 40 85 15
Foreign Policy and Israel/ICJ 60 85 15
Infrastructure and Amtrak/Rail 70 88 12
Immigration and Border Policy 70 88 12
Climate and Environmental Protection 88 90 10
Tax Policy and Federal Debt 75 90 10
Disaster Preparedness and Coastal Resilience 85 92 8
Transgender Athletes and Social Policy 45 95 5
Healthcare Access and Medicaid 90 95 5
SNAP and Nutrition Assistance 55 95 5
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Contradiction Risk30%Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence20%Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk15%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume15%Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation0%Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment0%Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]
Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains, while 8 elected officials hold documented connections.
$3.7BDonor Contributions
0Money Chains
0Traced Hops
Connected Officials
Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

View Full Entity Profile →