GOBLIN HOUSE
[ Enter Database → ]
| Bill | Vote | Date | Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (2026 Farm Bill) | nay_unverified | 2026-04-30 | aligned |
| One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Trump's 2025 budget reconciliation bill) | nay | 2025-07-03 | mixed |
| House Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Resolution (reconciliation framework enabling cuts | nay | 2025-02-26 | aligned |
| Laken Riley Act (2025 version) | nay_unverified | 2025-01-07 | misaligned |
| Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($60.8 billion in Ukraine | yea | 2024-04-20 | mixed |
| Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (omnibus $26.38B package) | yea_unverified | 2024-04-20 | mixed |
| Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (standalone $17.6B bill) | nay | 2024-02-06 | deviating |
| Condemning antisemitism and stating that anti-Zionism is antisemitism | abstain_unverified | 2023-12-05 | mixed |
| Disapproving the D.C. Council's Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (congressional | nay | 2023-02-09 | deviating |
| Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, ~$9 billi | yea | 2021-11-05 | aligned |
| For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1 under 117th Congress) | yea | 2021-03-03 | mixed |
| Budget Control Act of 2011 (debt ceiling deal with spending cuts) | nay | 2011-08-02 | deviating |
The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:
| Component | Weight | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Silence Risk | 25% | Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent |
| Contradiction Risk | 25% | Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted) |
| Connection Density | 20% | Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups |
| Intelligence Volume | 10% | Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale) |
| Donor Influence | 10% | Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction |
| Constituency Deviation | 5% | Gap between district priorities and legislative focus |
| Voting Misalignment | 5% | Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions |
Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.
Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.
Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.
Full methodology: /congress/methodology