[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → André Carson

André Carson

Democratic · Representative, IN ·7
Score Components
5 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 10%
48 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population (2024 estimate): 752,682
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Age: 34.2 years (national: 38.5)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Racial Composition: White 47.4%, Black 32.4%, Hispanic 15.3%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership Rate: 54.3%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty Rate (2024): 16.3%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Household Income (2024): $64,147
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Indiana Constitutional Amendment — Remove State Superintendent of Public Instruction from Gubernatorial Succession (2024) — passed, margin Passed with no organized opposition
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 311 - Manufacturing (share 0.11)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 441 - Retail Trade (share 0.114)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 622 - Health Care & Social Assistance (share 0.146)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: State of Indiana (31363 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: U.S. Government (incl. DoD, USPS) (40300 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Walmart Inc. (41030 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Indiana's 7th Congressional District encompasses most of Marion County and Indianapolis, with a population of approximately 752,682. It is a majority-minority district (47.4% White, 32.4% Black, 15.3% Hispanic) and is rated D+40, making it the most Democratic-leaning district in Indiana. The district has a median hou
secondary
Voted yea on H.J.Res. 72 (Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 1, 2025 — On Passage) on 2026-02-11: Supported the resolution relating to presidential emergency powers. Carson is a cosponsor of legislation requiring congressional authorization for military action, reflecting his consistent position on war powers.
primary · 2026-02-11
Voted yea on H.R. 1689 (Extending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian immigrants) on 2026-04-16: Carson signed a discharge petition to force this bill to the floor when Republican leadership refused to act. An estimated 50,000 Haitian immigrants live in Indiana. This was a rare bipartisan immigration vote.
primary · 2026-04-16
Voted nay on H.R. 4758 (Homeowner Energy Freedom Act — On Passage) on 2026-02-25: Voted against a GOP energy bill. Carson's district has a 54.3% homeownership rate (below 65.5% national average), and his opposition aligned with his broader energy-affordability advocacy for constituents.
primary · 2026-02-25
Voted nay on H.R. 6387 (FIRE Act — On Passage) on 2026-04-22: Voted against a bill related to federal infrastructure and disaster management. Carson sits on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and has championed FEMA reform, making this a substantive committee-area vote.
primary · 2026-04-22
Voted nay on H.R. 5587 (HEATS Act — On Passage) on 2026-04-23: Voted against the Republican energy bill with 186 Democrats. Carson has co-sponsored the Energy Bills Relief Act, advocating for utility-cost relief for Hoosiers. His district has a 16.3% poverty rate, making energy affordability a direct constituent concern.
primary · 2026-04-23
Voted nay on H.Res. 771 (Standing with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas) on 2023-10-25: Carson was the only Indiana House member (out of 9) to vote against the resolution, and one of only 10 nationwide. He called the resolution 'horribly one-sided' for failing to acknowledge Palestinian lives lost, while affirming condem
primary · 2023-10-25
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
HEATS Act — On Passage nay 2026-04-23 deviating
FIRE Act — On Passage nay 2026-04-22 deviating
Extending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian immigrants yea 2026-04-16 deviating
Homeowner Energy Freedom Act — On Passage nay 2026-02-25 deviating
Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 1, 2025 — yea 2026-02-11 deviating
SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) — On Passage nay 2025-04-10 deviating
Standing with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by H nay 2023-10-25 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →