[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → John R. Curtis

John R. Curtis

Republican · Senator, UT
Score Components
26 ELEVATED
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
82 → 21
Intelligence Volume 10%
52 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: R+32
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Mormon (LDS) adherent share: ~55-60% (Pew/PRRI estimates)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic/Latino population share: 15.6%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 32 (youngest in U.S.)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 36.1%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 71.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 4.0% (January 2026)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 8.6%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $95,166 (2020-2024 ACS)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Utah Constitutional Amendment A — Strengthen Education Funding (income tax earmark) (2024) — passed, margin 62% Yes — 38% No
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 0.097)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.116)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.126)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Brigham Young University (5000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Hill Air Force Base (23000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: University of Utah / University of Utah Health (23000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Intermountain Healthcare (42000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Utah is a deeply conservative western state of approximately 3.54 million residents, with roughly 85% concentrated along the Wasatch Front (Salt Lake City, Provo, Ogden metropolitan corridor). The state has a median household income of $95,166 (Census 2020-2024), well above the national median, with a low 8.6% povert
secondary
Voted yea on S. Con. Res. 22 (Continuing Resolution to Fund Government — September 2025) on 2025-09-19: Curtis voted to advance a continuing resolution to fund the government, breaking from fiscal hawks like Mike Lee who voted nay. The CR was rejected 44-48. This pattern — Curtis voting to fund government while Lee and MAGA conservatives vote no — echoes his
primary · 2025-09-19
Voted nay on H.Con.Res. 14 (Senate Budget Resolution FY2025 — SAVE Act filibuster stance) on 2026-02-11: Curtis opposed using the 'nuclear option' to pass the SAVE Act voter ID bill via a talking filibuster bypass — a procedural position that put him at odds with Trump, Senate MAGA allies, and his Utah colleague Mike Lee. Curtis argued the strategy was 'a sl
primary · 2026-02-11
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Opposing Jeremy Carl for Assistant Secretary of State for International Organiza nay 2026-02-12 aligned
Senate Budget Resolution FY2025 — SAVE Act filibuster stance nay 2026-02-11 deviating
Continuing Resolution to Fund Government — September 2025 yea 2025-09-19 deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — Senate passage yea 2025-07-01 mixed
Confirmation of Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense yea 2025-01-24 mixed
Laken Riley Act yea 2025-01-20 aligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 yea 2024-04-20 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
platform_vs_vote 90/100
Platform: "Curtis founded the Conservative Climate Caucus in 2021 to educate House Republicans on climate policies, stating 'climate change is a global issue.' H"
Vote: on "Curtis voted yea on the OBBBA (July 1, 2025) — legislation that largely dismantles federal tax incen"
Curtis built his national brand as the Republican who takes climate change seriously — founding the Conservative Climate Caucus and being named to Time's climate leaders list — yet voted for legislation that dismantles federal clean-energy tax incent
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "In his January 2025 op-ed for The Hill, Curtis argued that Trump's mass deportation agenda was not being 'wielded with a proper portion of compassion'"
Vote: on "Curtis co-sponsored and voted for the Laken Riley Act (January 2025), legislation requiring mandator"
Curtis publicly called for 'compassion' in immigration enforcement and wrote movingly about watching a migrant's arrest, yet he co-sponsored and voted for the Laken Riley Act — legislation civil liberties groups argue mandates detention for nonviolen
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "Curtis campaigned as a fiscal conservative, voting against the 2019 Bipartisan Budget Act on deficit grounds and introducing legislation to withhold c"
Vote: on "Curtis voted yea on the OBBBA (July 1, 2025), which the CBO projected would add $3.3 trillion to the"
Curtis campaigned as a fiscal conservative, withheld his own pay during shutdowns, and voted against the 2019 budget deal on deficit grounds — yet he voted for the OBBBA (2025), which the CBO projected would add $3.3 trillion to the deficit. The fisc
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →