[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Rosa L. DeLauro

Democratic · Representative, CT ·3

Score Components

10 MODERATE

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

18 → 5

Intelligence Volume 10%

54 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: D+15 (shifted D+2 since last redistricting)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: public transit utilization: 2.5% (vs. 5% nationally)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 5.7% (vs. 3.5% nationally)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,530 (vs. $1,163 nationally)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median home value: $357,600

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Black population share: 11.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 17.5%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 65.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 39.6 (largest cohort 20-29 at 15.1%)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 38.9% (vs. 33.7% nationally, 14.7% post-graduate)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 66% (vs. 65.5% nationally)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 9.69% (vs. 12.4% nationally)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $90,013 (vs. $37,585 national median)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 737,494 (2024 ACS)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Connecticut Early Voting Amendment (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 59.4% Yes — 40.6% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.11)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 61 (share 0.15)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.19)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: U.S. Repeating Arms / Winchester (New Haven area) (1000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Sikorsky Aircraft / Lockheed Martin (Stratford) (8000 employees)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 5, 2026)	yea	2026-03-05	deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House passage, May 22, 2025; Senate amendme	nay	2025-07-03	aligned
FY 2025 Budget Resolution (Reconciliation Framework, April 10, 2025)	nay	2025-04-10	aligned
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 7, 2025 Senate version; January 22, 202	nay	2025-01-23	aligned
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($26 billion military aid)	yea	2024-04-20	aligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($61 billion military aid	yea	2024-04-20	aligned

Last contradiction analysis: Never

statement_vs_disclosure 30/100

Platform: "DeLauro voted yea on H.R. 8034 ($26 billion Israel military aid) on April 20, 2024, as part of the comprehensive $95 billion national security package"

Vote: on "DeLauro boycotted Netanyahu's July 2024 address to Congress, stating she was 'shocked by the ongoing"

DeLauro voted for $26 billion in Israel military aid while simultaneously condemning the Netanyahu government's 'indiscriminate bombing campaign,' boycotting his congressional address, and calling for an immediate ceasefire — a nuanced position that

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →