[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Madeleine Dean

Madeleine Dean

Democratic · Representative, PA ·4
Score Components
10 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
18 → 5
Intelligence Volume 10%
54 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: D+18
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 4.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,637
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median property value: $404,000
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: foreign-born population: 9.22% (71,500 people, 2024)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 76.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 42.1
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 49.2% (21.4% post-graduate)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 74.6%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 4.1% (LegisLetter) / 6.5% (Data USA)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $110,538
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 774,814 (2024)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Pennsylvania Statewide Ballot Question — Abortion Rights (2024) (2024) — not on ballot, margin no statewide reproductive rights amendment on ballot
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Pennsylvania Constitutional Amendment — Voter ID Requirement (2025) (2025) — pending, margin legislative referral
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 (share 0.1)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 52 (share 0.11)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.17)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: SEI Investments Company (Oaks, Montgomery County) (5000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Tower Health / Reading Hospital (Berks County) (7000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Main Line Health / Jefferson Abington Hospital (11000 employees)
secondary
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (March 2026) nay 2026-03-27 aligned
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 2026) yea_unverified 2026-03-05 deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House final passage, July 2025 nay 2025-07-03 aligned
Fire Sale Loophole Closing Act of 2025 (introduced) sponsored_unverified 2025-06-27 aligned
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 2025) nay 2025-01-07 aligned
National Security Supplemental (Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan — April 2024) yea 2024-04-20 aligned
Resolution Condemning 'From the River to the Sea' as Antisemitic present 2024-04-16 mixed
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (Standalone GOP bill, February 2 nay 2024-02-06 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "Dean positions herself as a progressive Democrat — she is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and campaigns on progressive priorities inc"
Vote: on "A WIN PA super PAC mailer accused Dean of siding 'with pro-Hamas terrorists and against Israel,' hig"
Dean's progressive Israel stance — voting against standalone Israel aid, boycotting Netanyahu's speech, and voting 'present' on the antisemitism resolution — drew a massive GOP super PAC attack funded by billionaire Jeff Yass. While her progressive b
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →