[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Maxine Dexter

Democratic · Representative, OR ·3

Score Components

10 MODERATE

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

18 → 5

Intelligence Volume 10%

56 → 6

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: D+46

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 5.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,647

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median property value: $530,400

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: U.S. citizenship rate: 93.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: foreign-born population: 13.4% (94,000 people)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Asian (Non-Hispanic) population share: 7.2% (50,600 people)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 14.8% (104,000 people)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 67% (449,000 people)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 39.1

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 41.4% (15.5% post-graduate)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 60.4%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 7.8% (LegisLetter ACS) / 12.1% (Data USA 2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $89,326

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 699,535 (2024 Data USA)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Portland Charter Reform — Expanded City Council and Ranked-Choice Voting (2022) (2022) — passed, margin 58% Yes — 42% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Oregon Measure 117 — Ranked-Choice Voting for Statewide and Federal Elections (2024) (2024) — failed, margin 44% Yes — 56% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.1)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 (share 0.11)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.17)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Iran War Powers Resolution (Dexter-introduced, April 2026)	sponsored	2026-04-27	deviating
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 2026)	yea	2026-03-05	deviating
Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act (December 2025)	nay	2025-12-17	aligned
Government Funding Continuing Resolution — November 2025 Shutdown Deal	nay	2025-11-13	deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House passage, May 2025 and July 2025	nay	2025-07-03	aligned
FY2025 Budget Resolution (Reconciliation Framework)	nay	2025-02-25	aligned
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 2025)	nay	2025-01-07	aligned
SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, July 2024)	nay	2024-07-10	aligned

Last contradiction analysis: Never

same_source_inconsistency 30/100

Platform: "Dexter ran in the 2024 Democratic primary as a mainstream progressive with AIPAC-backed funding. United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) spent $1"

Vote: on "By November 2025, Dexter had 'shifted dramatically to the far left' on Israel, according to Jewish I"

[auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Dexter won her primary with AIPAC's super PAC spending $1.3 million to defeat a ceasefire advocate, then within 18 months fully reversed — accusing Israel of genocide on the House floor, c

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →