[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Sarah Elfreth

Sarah Elfreth

Democratic · Representative, MD ·3
Score Components
17 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
10 → 3
Contradiction Risk 25%
36 → 9
Intelligence Volume 10%
50 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher (age 25+): 42.7%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population Asian (Non-Hispanic): 10.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population Black or African American (Non-Hispanic): 17.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population White (Non-Hispanic): 56.6%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate (2024): 5.57%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income (2024): $133,046
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Maryland Question 1 (2024) — Reproductive Freedom Constitutional Amendment (2024) — passed, margin 74% yes – 26% no
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 - Retail Trade (share 0.08)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 61 - Educational Services (share 0.09)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance (share 0.13)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 - Public Administration (share 0.11)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (share 0.15)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Howard County Public School System (9000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: U.S. Naval Academy (2500 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: University of Maryland Medical System (5000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (8500 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Fort Meade (U.S. Army/NSA) (56000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Maryland's 3rd Congressional District encompasses all of Howard County and portions of Anne Arundel and Carroll counties in central Maryland, including the state capital of Annapolis. It is a safely Democratic, affluent, and highly educated district with a median household income of approximately $133,046 — well abov
secondary
Voted nay on H.R. 22 (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act) on 2025-02-06: Elfreth voted against legislation requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, which opponents described as a voter-suppression measure. Her vote aligns with her Democratic district and party, but the bill passed narrowly (220-208), making her oppositi
primary · 2025-02-06
Voted nay on H.R. 5371 (FY26 National Defense Authorization Act) on 2025-09-10: Elfreth voted against the annual defense bill despite her district housing Fort Meade, NSA, Johns Hopkins APL, and the Naval Academy — and despite securing 29 of her own provisions in the bill. She cited politicization and lack of guardrails on troop deployment. This pits constit
inferential · 2025-09-10
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
FY26 National Defense Authorization Act nay 2025-09-10 mixed
Rescissions Act of 2025 (codifying DOGE cuts) nay 2025-06-12 aligned
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act nay 2025-02-06 deviating
Child Predator Empowerment Act (transgender athletics ban) nay_unverified 2025-01-14 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
position_evolution 60/100
Platform: "Sarah Elfreth's campaign benefited from $4.2 million in independent expenditures by AIPAC's United Democracy Project, which promotes unconditional U.S"
Vote: on "In her July 25, 2025 statement, Elfreth called on Israel to 'take immediate action to address the ne"
Elfreth accepted $4.2M in support from AIPAC, a group that opposes conditioning U.S. aid to Israel, but later called for Israel to take immediate action on civilian protection and humanitarian access. These are distinct policy moments — accepting sup
statement_vs_disclosure 30/100
Platform: "Elfreth's campaign touted her as a steadfast gun safety advocate, and she was endorsed by gun-control groups. She voted against ghost guns and firearm"
Vote: on "According to Maryland Bay News, critics including a rival campaign manager argued Elfreth's gun cont"
Elfreth's campaign presented her as a strong gun-control advocate, while rival campaign operatives claimed specific votes showed a softer record. Both claims derive from interpretations of her Maryland Senate voting record, and the primary source rec
Last silence detection: Never
Israel-Gaza war and U.S. military aid to Israel (April–May 2024 primary campaign)
43d silent
Expected position: As a Democratic candidate for Congress receiving over $4.2 million in AIPAC-affiliated super PAC support, Elfreth would be expected to articulate a clear position on the Israel-Gaza
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →