[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Mike Flood

Republican · Representative, NE ·1

Score Components

17 MODERATE

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

46 → 12

Intelligence Volume 10%

53 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: R+20

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 2.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,103

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median home value: $259,500

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 11.7%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 80.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 35.9

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 36.3%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 64.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 6.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $79,326

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 662,376

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Nebraska Initiative 437 — Medical Marijuana Legalization (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 71% Yes — 29% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Nebraska Initiative 439 — Right to Abortion Before Fetal Viability (2024) (2024) — failed, margin 49% Yes — 51% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Nebraska Initiative 434 — Prohibit Abortions After First Trimester (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 55.3% Yes — 44.7% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.11)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 52 (share 0.12)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.14)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Nelnet / Lincoln Financial Group (4000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Bryan Health (Lincoln hospitals) (5000 employees)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 2026)	nay	2026-03-05	deviating
Government Funding Continuing Resolution — November 2025 Shutdown Deal	yea	2025-11-12	deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House final passage, July 3, 2025	yea	2025-07-03	misaligned
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 7, 2025)	yea	2025-01-07	deviating
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($61 billion)	yea	2024-04-20	deviating
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($26 billion)	yea	2024-04-20	aligned

Last contradiction analysis: Never

platform_vs_vote 90/100

Platform: "Flood campaigned as a fiscal conservative who would rein in government overreach, stating 'We do not have unlimited money in the United States' at a t"

Vote: on "Flood voted yea on the OBBBA (H.R. 1) on both May 22 and July 3, 2025. The CBO projected the bill wo"

Flood built his political brand on fiscal conservatism and 'not having unlimited money,' yet voted for the OBBBA which the CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt — while simultaneously admitting he had not read key provisions of t

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →