[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Jimmy Gomez

Democratic · Representative, CA ·34

Score Components

31 ELEVATED

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

20 → 5

Contradiction Risk 25%

82 → 21

Intelligence Volume 10%

54 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Citizenship Rate: 75.2%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Property Value: $838,100

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Non-English Language at Home: 71.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Age: 36.6

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's Degree or Higher: 29.4%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-Born Population: 43.4%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic Population Share: 64.4%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership Rate: 22.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty Rate: 20.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Household Income: $63,055

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Los Angeles County Measure A — Homelessness Services and Affordable Housing Tax (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 58%-42%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: California Proposition 3 — Marriage Rights Protections (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 63%-37%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: California Proposition 33 — Expand Local Rent Control (2024) (2024) — failed, margin 62%-38%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (Manufacturing) (share 0.08)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 72 (Accommodation and Food Services) (share 0.11)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (Retail Trade) (share 0.12)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (Health Care and Social Assistance) (share 0.16)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Eisner Pediatric & Family Medical Center (500 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Los Angeles Unified School District (serving district schools) (25000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center (6000 employees)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Iran War Powers Resolution — to end unauthorized U.S. military involvement in Ir	yea_unverified	2026-03-04	aligned
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — Trump tax cut and spending reconciliation,	nay_unverified	2025-07-02	aligned
Resolution to repeal IRS crypto broker reporting rule	yea_unverified	2025-03-11	aligned
House GOP Budget Resolution 2025 — framework for Medicaid/SNAP cuts	nay_unverified	2025-02-25	aligned
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) — crypto re	yea_unverified	2024-05-22	aligned
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 — $26 billion in military	yea_unverified	2024-04-20	aligned

Last contradiction analysis: Never

platform_vs_vote 90/100

Platform: "Gomez's campaign website states he 'does not accept corporate PAC money' and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's 2024 endorsement says he 'rejects corporate PA"

Vote: on "In the 2023-2024 cycle, 47.46% of Gomez's campaign funds ($712,715) came from PAC contributions. His"

Gomez's signature anti-corruption pledge to reject corporate PAC money is contradicted by his acceptance of $712,715 in PAC contributions (47.46% of his 2024 cycle fundraising). His campaign defends the distinction by arguing that trade association a

statement_vs_disclosure 60/100

Platform: "Gomez tweeted criticism of Trump for profiting from crypto: Trump and the billionaire establishment are profiting as 'everyone else gets screwed.'"

Vote: on "Crypto industry PAC Fairshake spent $511,000 in outside spending to support Gomez in the 2024 electi"

Gomez publicly criticized Trump for crypto profiteering while accepting $511,000 in crypto industry outside spending and voting for at least four pro-crypto bills. The Intercept noted this contradiction: 'More recently, however, Gomez criticized Trum

same_source_inconsistency 30/100

Platform: "Gomez stated in April 2024 upon voting to send humanitarian aid to Gaza and Ukraine: 'I remain convinced that Benjamin Netanyahu is an impediment to p"

Vote: on "Gomez did not sign onto the early October 2023 ceasefire resolution pushed by progressive Democrats,"

Both quotes come from the same secondary source (The Intercept). Gomez called Netanyahu 'an impediment to peace' while simultaneously voting for $26 billion in military aid to Israel and declining to sign the early ceasefire resolution — a tension Th

Last silence detection: Never

Corporate PAC pledge vs. actual PAC receipts

761d silent

Expected position: Gomez's campaign website prominently claims he 'does not accept corporate PAC money' and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's endorsement cites that he 'rejects corporate PAC money.' With 47.

Crypto industry funding while criticizing Trump's crypto profiteering

339d silent

Expected position: Gomez tweeted in September 2025 that Trump and the billionaire establishment profit as 'everyone else gets screwed' from crypto, yet crypto PAC Fairshake spent $511,000 backing him

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →