[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

Democratic · Representative, WA ·3

Score Components

29 ELEVATED

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

10 → 3

Contradiction Risk 25%

82 → 21

Intelligence Volume 10%

56 → 6

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Public transit commuting share: 0.8%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median age: 40.5

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment rate: 5.3%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Citizenship rate: 96.0%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-born population: 8.88% (70k)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 11.7% (92.5k)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 75.0% (591k)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population: 788,069 (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median rent: $1,605

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median property value: $474,300

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 28.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 69.2%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 9.33% (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $90,428 (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2117 — Prohibition of carbon tax credit trading (November 2024) (2024) — failed, margin 61.9% No to 38.1% Yes

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2109 — Repeal of the capital gains excise tax (November 2024) (2024) — failed, margin 63.6% No to 36.4% Yes

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 11 - Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (share 0.048)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 - Manufacturing (share 0.112)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 - Retail Trade (share 0.119)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance (share 0.142)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (Farm Bill) — On Passage	yea	2026-04-30	mixed
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 — On Passage	yea	2026-01-22	mixed
Resolution Disapproving of the Behavior of Representative Jesús 'Chuy' García	yea	2025-11-18	deviating
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026 — Ending the 43-Day Governmen	yea	2025-11-12	deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act — On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment	nay	2025-07-03	mixed
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act — On Passage	yea	2025-04-10	deviating
Laken Riley Act — On Passage	yea	2025-01-22	deviating
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 — On Motion to Suspend the	yea	2024-02-06	aligned
Providing for congressional disapproval of the President's student loan cancella	yea	2023-05-24	deviating

Last contradiction analysis: Never

reversal 90/100

Platform: "Gluesenkamp Perez voted Yea on the SAVE Act (H.R. 22) on April 10, 2025, requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federa"

Vote: on "Gluesenkamp Perez voted Nay on the SAVE America Act (H.R. 7296) on February 11, 2026, joining all De"

Gluesenkamp Perez voted for the SAVE Act in April 2025 — one of only 4 Democrats — then voted against the SAVE America Act 10 months later in February 2026. Both bills required proof of citizenship for voter registration, but the SAVE America Act add

platform_vs_vote 60/100

Platform: "Gluesenkamp Perez voted against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) on July 3, 2025, calling it 'one of the largest explosions of our deficit ever"

Vote: on "The OBBB raised the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for tax years 2025-2029. WA-03 has me"

Gluesenkamp Perez voted against the OBBB, which raised the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 — a provision that would benefit homeowners in her district where median home values are $474,300. Her statement opposing the bill did not mention t

statement_vs_disclosure 60/100

Platform: "Gluesenkamp Perez voted Yea on the DHS appropriations bill (H.R. 7147) on January 22, 2026, one of only 7 Democrats to fund the agency overseeing ICE."

Vote: on "Following the DHS vote, Gluesenkamp Perez's Vancouver office was vandalized and she received message"

Gluesenkamp Perez voted to fund DHS/ICE in January 2026 as one of only 7 Democrats, then within days issued statements criticizing the administration's ICE 'posture and bravado' after her office was vandalized. She sought to have it both ways — votin

Last silence detection: Never

Washington State's new capital-gains-based income tax signed by Governor Bob Ferguson in April 2026

22d silent

Expected position: As the representative of WA-03 — a swing district with median household income of $90,428 and strong anti-tax sentiment — Gluesenkamp Perez would be expected to weigh in on a new st

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →