[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Adelita S. Grijalva

Democratic · Representative, AZ ·7

Score Components

5 LOW

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

0 → 0

Intelligence Volume 10%

49 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's Degree or Higher: 33.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership Rate: 70.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty Rate: 6.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment Rate: 4.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Household Income: $82,925

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 137: Judicial Retention (2024) — failed, margin 54%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 139: Abortion Access (2024) — passed, margin 62%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 314: Immigration Enforcement (2024) — passed, margin 58%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 (share 10.9)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 12.3)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 15.5)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Tucson Medical Center (4000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Raytheon Missile Systems (12000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (8000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Banner Health (5000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: University of Arizona (15000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] District summary: Arizona's 7th congressional district is located in the south central part of the state, encompassing all of Santa Cruz County and the western portions of Pima County, including the city of Tucson. The district has a population of 802,956, with a median household income of $82,925, above the national average. The larg

secondary

Voted yea on H.R. 8029 (Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025) on 2025-03-13: Voted for a bill that funds a 10% increase in border patrol agents, a key donor ask from border security contractors.

primary · 2025-03-13

Voted yea on H.R. 8035 (FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2025) on 2025-05-22: Voted to reauthorize Title VII of FISA, expanding warrantless surveillance powers, a stance that contradicts his past criticism of government overreach.

primary · 2025-05-22

Voted nay on H.R. 7147 (Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026) on 2025-07-24: Voted against a bill that funds border wall construction and increases ICE detention capacity, aligning with his campaign promises on immigration.

primary · 2025-07-24

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Call for investigation into DHS conduct	signed	2025-12-12	deviating
House Committee on Natural Resources	confirmed	2025-12-05	deviating
Epstein Files Transparency Act	yea	2025-11-12	deviating
Compromise funding package to end the 43-day government shutdown	yea	2025-11-12	deviating
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026	nay	2025-07-24	deviating
FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2025	yea	2025-05-22	misaligned
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025	yea	2025-03-13	aligned
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024	nay	2023-07-14	misaligned
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023	yea	2023-05-31	deviating

Last contradiction analysis: Never

No contradictions detected

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →