[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

Democratic · Representative, CA ·2
Score Components
9 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
18 → 5
Intelligence Volume 10%
45 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 43.3%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 63.7%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 6.1%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $98,747
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 1 — Behavioral Health Services and Bond Measure (2024) — passed, margin 50.2%-49.8%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 72 (share 0.11)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.13)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.19)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: County governments (Marin, Sonoma, Humboldt) (12000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Sutter Health (16000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Kaiser Permanente (51000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: California's 2nd Congressional District spans the North Coast from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Oregon border, encompassing Marin, Sonoma, Mendocino, Humboldt, Trinity, and Del Norte counties. The district is home to approximately 755,000 residents and is characterized by a mix of affluent Bay Area suburbs, small co
secondary
Voted nay on H.R. 5430 (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act) on 2019-12-19: The USMCA passed overwhelmingly (385-41) with strong bipartisan and Democratic support. Huffman was among only 38 Democrats to vote no, citing the agreement's failure to mention climate change and what he called insufficient labor and environmental protections —
primary · 2019-12-19
Voted nay on H.R. 3746 (Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023) on 2023-05-31: Huffman was one of only 46 House Democrats to oppose the Biden-McCarthy debt ceiling deal (passed 314-117). He cited permanent NEPA rollbacks, the fast-tracked Mountain Valley Pipeline, and SNAP/TANF cuts as 'odious concessions to Republicans.' This was a rare party defection by a prog
primary · 2023-05-31
Voted yea on H.R. 8034 (Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024) on 2024-04-20: Huffman joined 173 Democrats in voting for $26.38 billion in military aid to Israel. His district encompasses some of the most progressive constituencies in the country, including vocal pro-Palestinian activists. The vote sparked sustained protests at his town halls
primary · 2024-04-20
[vote] Huffman voted 'Yea' on April 20, 2024, to pass H.R. 8034, the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, authorizing $26.38 billion in military aid to Israel, a vote that prompted a class-action lawsuit by constituents accusing him of complicity in genocide.
primary · 2024-04-20
[platform] Huffman is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Medicare for All Caucus, and is a vocal supporter of Medicare for All, debt-free college, and other progressive priorities, earning a Vote Score in the 90s from progressive scorecards.
primary · 2025-05-02
Huffman voted against the House Republican tax bill (H.R. 1) in 2017, calling it a 'scam' that would 'lavish a huge tax windfall on the wealthiest Americans.'
primary · 2017-12-19
Pro-Israel lobby career contributions total $122,968, with $42,006 from PACs, according to Track AIPAC.
secondary · 2024-12-31
Net worth estimated between $811,045 and $2,146,000 (2018 disclosure), ranking 146th in the House.
secondary · 2018-12-31
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 yea 2024-04-20 misaligned
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 nay 2023-05-31 deviating
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act nay 2019-12-19 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
platform_vs_vote 60/100
Platform: "Huffman is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Medicare for All Caucus, and is a vocal supporter of Medicare for All, debt-free coll"
Vote: on "Huffman voted 'Yea' on April 20, 2024, to pass H.R. 8034, the Israel Security Supplemental Appropria"
Huffman positions himself as a leading House progressive and Medicare for All champion, yet voted with the majority to send $26 billion in military aid to Israel — a vote that many progressive activists and constituents in his deeply liberal district
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →