[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Pramila Jayapal

Democratic · Representative, WA ·7

Score Components

4 LOW

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

0 → 0

Intelligence Volume 10%

41 → 4

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 9.26%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-born population: 155,260 (19.1%)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $125,152

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Total population: 811,726

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2124 (Long-Term Care Trust Act Opt-Out) (2024) — failed, margin 56.1% to 43.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.12)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.12)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 (share 0.2)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Amazon.com Inc (75000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: University of Washington (40000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Microsoft Corp (55000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] District summary: Washington's 7th Congressional District encompasses urban and suburban areas of King County including Seattle, Shoreline, Lake Forest Park, and parts of unincorporated King County. The district is demographically diverse with a median age of 36.0 and a foreign-born population representing approximately 19% of residen

secondary

Voted nay_unverified on S.1318 (Laken Riley Act) on 2026-04-29: WA-07 has a significant foreign-born population (18.9%, ~147k residents) and is one of the most diverse districts in the nation; the vote opposed immigration enforcement legislation while aligning with Democratic party position, creating tension between constituent demographic interests and part

inferential · 2026-04-29

Voted nay_unverified on H.R.7567 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) on 2026-04-30: WA-07 is a high-cost, high-income district where federal spending on housing, healthcare, and social services directly benefits constituents; the vote opposed a major spending bill while aligning with Democratic party opposition, creating cross-pressure between potential constituent

inferential · 2026-04-30

Top donor sectors for Jayapal 2023-2024: Ideology/Single-Issue ($988,353), Labor ($280,022), Communications/Electronics ($238,678). Labor sector PAC contributions totaled $259,500.

secondary · 2024-12-31

Top contributing organizations to Jayapal's 2023-2024 campaign: Microsoft Corp ($55,212), University of Washington ($29,221), Service Employees International Union ($22,841), J Street ($20,750), Indian American Impact Fund ($20,000).

secondary · 2024-12-31

Pramila Jayapal's campaign committee raised $2,792,025 total in the 2023-2024 cycle, with 59.26% from large individual contributions ($1,655,181), 26.43% from small individual contributions under $200 ($738,280), and 15.07% from PACs ($420,800).

secondary · 2024-12-31

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
One Big Beautiful Bill Act	nay_unverified	2026-04-30	mixed
Laken Riley Act	nay_unverified	2026-04-29	mixed

Last contradiction analysis: Never

No contradictions detected

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →