[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → David Kustoff

David Kustoff

Republican · Representative, TN ·8
Score Components
33 ELEVATED
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
10 → 3
Contradiction Risk 25%
100 → 25
Intelligence Volume 10%
53 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 29.8%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 10.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 72.8%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Black or African American: 17.1%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic): 73.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population (2024): 767,898
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $69,163
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Amendment 4 — Remove Religious Minister Disqualification (2022) (2022) — passed, margin majority yes
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Amendment 3 — Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution (2022) (2022) — passed, margin 80% yes to 20% no
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Amendment 1 — Right-to-Work Constitutional Amendment (2022) (2022) — passed, margin 70% yes to 30% no — swept all 95 counties
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 0.13)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.15)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.17)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Baptist Memorial Health Care (Memphis area) (14000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Hitachi Energy (Alamo — Crockett County) (350 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: West Tennessee Healthcare (Jackson) (6000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: FedEx Corporation (Memphis HQ — adjacent to district) (30000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Tennessee's 8th Congressional District covers the bulk of West Tennessee, stretching from the Mississippi River to the eastern Memphis suburbs. The district includes all or parts of Shelby, Madison, Gibson, Dyer, Weakley, Henry, Carroll, Fayette, Hardeman, Hardin, McNairy, and surrounding counties. Major cities inclu
secondary
Voted nay on H.R. 8404 (Respect for Marriage Act) on 2022-12-08: One of 169 House Republicans to vote against codifying federal recognition of same-sex and interracial marriages. Only 39 Republicans supported the landmark civil rights bill.
primary · 2022-12-08
Voted nay on H.R. 3684 (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) on 2021-11-05: One of 200 House Republicans to oppose the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package that funded roads, bridges, broadband, and energy infrastructure across West Tennessee.
primary · 2021-11-05
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
One Big Beautiful Bill Act yea 2025-07-03 aligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 yea 2024-04-20 deviating
Respect for Marriage Act nay 2022-12-08 deviating
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act nay 2021-11-05 misaligned
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 nay 2021-02-27 misaligned
Last contradiction analysis: Never
reversal 90/100
Platform: "Kustoff voted against the American Rescue Plan Act, joining every Republican in opposing the $1.9 trillion COVID relief package."
Vote: on "Kustoff voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, celebrating it as delivering 'the largest spending"
Kustoff opposed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan as fiscally irresponsible, yet voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill — which the CBO projected would add far more to the deficit — while calling it 'the largest spending reduction in history.' The
platform_vs_vote 90/100
Platform: "Kustoff campaigned on fiscal conservatism and fighting to 'cut taxes and regulations' to defend 'West Tennessee values.'"
Vote: on "Kustoff voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, celebrating it as delivering 'the largest spending"
Kustoff campaigns on fiscal conservatism and cutting spending, but voted for the OBBB which added trillions to the national debt while touting it as 'the largest spending reduction in history' — a statement contradicted by the CBO's own projections.
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "Kustoff voted in favor of H.R. 8035, the Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2024, providing $60.8 billion in military aid to Ukraine."
Vote: on "Kustoff made anti-Ukraine statements, saying: 'We're all for Ukraine, we support their effort agains"
Kustoff voted for every major Ukraine aid package including the $60.8 billion supplemental, yet simultaneously made anti-Ukraine statements calling to 'stop the spending' — a dual-track approach that allowed him to support Ukraine militarily while si
Last silence detection: Never
In-person constituent town halls
2248d silent
Expected position: As a five-term congressman representing 767,898 constituents in a district with a 10.2% poverty rate and significant rural hospital access issues, Kustoff would be expected to hold
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →