[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Kimberlyn King-Hinds

Kimberlyn King-Hinds

Republican · Representative, MP ·0 ·Since 2025-01-03

Kimberlyn King-Hinds is the Republican U.S. Representative (MP's 0th congressional district), serving since 2025. The platform has 4 voting records on file (2025) and 44 verified facts on file covering this member's voting positions, financial disclosures, and stated platform commitments.

Score Components
25 LOW
Connection Density 20%
22 → 4
Donor Influence 15%
2 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
7 → 2
Contradiction Risk 25%
40 → 10
Intelligence Volume 15%
49 → 7
Constituency Deviation 0%
68 → 0
Voting Misalignment 0%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: CW-1 visa program cap (2023): 14,999 (lifeline for CNMI employers)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: broadband internet subscription rate (2020): 84.0%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: average household size (2020): 4.15
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Filipino population (alone, 2020): 15,456
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Chamorro population (alone, 2020): 12,001
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate (2020): 29.0%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate (families, 2019): 33.7% (approximately 38% of population below federal poverty line)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income (2019): $31,362
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population (2020 Census): 47,329
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: CNMI Senate and House of Representatives elections — 2024 General Election (2024) — mixed, margin multiple races across 3 senatorial districts and 7 house precincts
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.12)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 (share 0.25)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 72 (share 0.3)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Commonwealth Healthcare Corporation (CHCC) (900 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: CNMI Public School System (1200 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Government (3500 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] District summary: The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) is a U.S. territory in the western Pacific Ocean with a population of approximately 47,329 (2020 Census). The at-large congressional district encompasses 14 islands, with most residents concentrated on Saipan, Tinian, and Rota. The CNMI is a majority-minority territory where Asian residents form the largest racial…
[ Show full fact ]
[constituency_baseline] District summary: The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) is a U.S. territory in the western Pacific Ocean with a population of approximately 47,329 (2020 Census). The at-large congressional district encompasses 14 islands, with most residents concentrated on Saipan, Tinian, and Rota. The CNMI is a majority-minority territory where Asian residents form the largest racial group (22,054 identifying as Asian alone), followed by Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders (20,665 alone). The Chamorro population — the indigenous people of the Marianas — is the largest detailed ethnic group, with 12,001 identifying as Chamorro alone. The Filipino population (15,456 alone) is the largest detailed Asian group. The median household income is $31,362 — less than half the U.S. national median — and approximately 38% of the population lives below the federal poverty line, while 33.7% of families were in poverty as of 2019. The homeownership rate is only 29%. The economy is dominated by tourism, which before COVID-19 accounted for approximately 42% of GDP, with nearly 500,000 annual visitors in 2019. By FY2025, arrivals had dropped to approximately 160,640. The CNMI relies heavily on the CW-1 visa program (capped at 14,999 annually) for foreign workers. The territory has a unique Covenant relationship with the United States established in 1976, and its delegate to Congress holds non-voting status — able to serve on committees and vote on amendments in the Committee of the Whole, but not on final passage of legislation. King-Hinds is the second person and first woman to hold this office, first elected in 2024 with 40.3% of the vote in a five-way race.
secondary ✓ Verified
Voted sponsored on H.R. 3400 (Territorial Response and Access to Veterans' Essential Lifecare Act (TRAVEL Act of 2025)) on 2025-05-14: King-Hinds introduced her first bill — the TRAVEL Act — to authorize the VA to assign traveling physicians to provide essential healthcare to veterans in U.S. territories. The bill passed the House 371-21 on September 15, 2025, with broad bipartisan support. The legislation directly…
[ Show full fact ]
Voted sponsored on H.R. 3400 (Territorial Response and Access to Veterans' Essential Lifecare Act (TRAVEL Act of 2025)) on 2025-05-14: King-Hinds introduced her first bill — the TRAVEL Act — to authorize the VA to assign traveling physicians to provide essential healthcare to veterans in U.S. territories. The bill passed the House 371-21 on September 15, 2025, with broad bipartisan support. The legislation directly addresses a core constituent need: the CNMI's 1,937 veterans lack access to specialized medical care without traveling thousands of miles to Hawaii or the mainland. This is the most significant legislative achievement of her freshman term and exemplifies her focus on territorial parity. The bill was co-sponsored by both Republican and Democratic delegates from other territories.
primary · 2025-05-14 ✓ Verified
Voted yea on H.R. 3838 (Multiple Amendments — September 10, 2025) on 2025-09-10: King-Hinds voted yea on multiple H.R. 3838 amendments (Nos. 3, 5, 11, 14, 23, 24) that passed. Her voting pattern shows she supports some amendments while opposing most others — consistent with a delegate who participates actively in committee work but exercises selective support.
primary · 2025-09-10 ✓ Verified
Voted yea on H.R. 4776 (Roy of Texas Amendment No. 5 (FY2026 NDAA amendment)) on 2025-12-18: King-Hinds voted yea on a conservative amendment to the FY2026 NDAA — a rare yea vote among her predominantly nay voting record (11 yea, 30 nay across 51 recorded amendment votes). The amendment failed. As a non-voting delegate, she can vote in the Committee of the Whole on amendments but not on final passage.
primary · 2025-12-18 ✓ Verified
Chuck Schumer Constituent (NY delegate relationship) King-Hinds is listed as Delegate for American Samoa, not directly connected to Schumer's NY constituency. However, as a Senate leader, Schumer would have…
America'S Bold Era PAC donor $5,000 to Kimberlyn King-Hinds's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00877365/
Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC donor $5,000 to Kimberlyn King-Hinds's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00563726/
BillVoteDateAlignment
Yea 2026-07-22 unknown
Yea 2026-07-22 unknown
Yea 2026-07-22 unknown
Nay 2026-07-22 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Yea 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-21 unknown
Nay 2026-07-15 unknown
Yea 2026-07-15 unknown
Nay 2026-07-15 unknown
Nay 2026-07-15 unknown
Nay 2026-07-15 unknown
Nay 2026-05-15 unknown
Not Voting 2026-04-30 unknown
Not Voting 2026-04-30 unknown
Not Voting 2026-04-30 unknown
Not Voting 2026-04-30 unknown
Not Voting 2026-04-30 unknown
Last contradiction analysis: Never
same_source_inconsistency 30/100
Platform: "King-Hinds touted the OBBBA (H.R. 1) as protecting CNMI Medicaid funding, stating the bill 'keeps the CNMI's Medicaid funding structure intact with an 83% federal match rate and roughly $66 million' and that 'these…
[ Show full platform position ]
King-Hinds touted the OBBBA (H.R. 1) as protecting CNMI Medicaid funding, stating the bill 'keeps the CNMI's Medicaid funding structure intact with an 83% federal match rate and roughly $66 million' and that 'these changes will not affect our block grants.'
"
Vote: on "In the same interview, King-Hinds expressed concern about the OBBBA's Medicaid work requirement…"
King-Hinds simultaneously touted the OBBBA as protecting CNMI Medicaid funding while acknowledging the work requirement could harm constituents in an economy where 'businesses are closing' and 'there are no jobs.' Both statements appear in the same interview, creating an internal tension between her political support…
[ Show full analysis ]
King-Hinds simultaneously touted the OBBBA as protecting CNMI Medicaid funding while acknowledging the work requirement could harm constituents in an economy where 'businesses are closing' and 'there are no jobs.' Both statements appear in the same interview, creating an internal tension between her political support for the bill and her substantive concern about its impact on an island territory with 38% poverty. Both quotes come from the same Marianas Variety article; editors may downgrade visibility.
Last silence detection: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:56:50 GMT (via scheduled run)
colleagues' leadership pacs
Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC, America'S Bold Era PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
other / unclassified
America'S Bold Era PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
America'S Bold Era PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2026)
Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2026)
TopicPriorityAlignmentDeviation
Jones Act Reform / Territorial Shipping Costs 88 40 60
Minimum Wage and FLSA Territorial Exemptions 82 45 55
Climate Change Adaptation and Ocean Policy 68 50 50
Taxation of U.S. Insular Possessions (OBBBA Territorial Provisions) 76 55 45
Education Funding (Impact Aid, E-Rate, Territorial Schools) 72 58 42
Immigration and Guest Worker Programs (CW-1 Workers) 75 60 40
Infrastructure Funding (IIJA, Broadband, Ports) 70 62 38
Federal Disaster Recovery and Climate Resilience (Typhoons, Sea-Level Rise) 94 65 35
Government Ethics, Transparency, and Lobbying Disclosure 45 70 30
Medicaid and Compact-of-Free-Association Migrant Healthcare Funding 96 72 28
Non-Voting Delegate Floor Rights and Committee Assignments 40 75 25
Veterans Services and Benefits Access 79 92 8
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Contradiction Risk30%Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence20%Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk15%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume15%Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation0%Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment0%Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]
Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains, while 10 elected officials hold documented connections.
$100.0MDonor Contributions
0Money Chains
0Traced Hops
Connected Officials
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
  • Chuck Schumer U.S. Senate · Constituent (NY delegate relationship)
Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

View Full Entity Profile →