[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Greg Landsman

Democratic · Representative, OH ·1

Score Components

16 MODERATE

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

46 → 12

Intelligence Volume 10%

46 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 46.5%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 60.3%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 14%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $80,294

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Ohio Issue 2 (November 2023) — Marijuana Legalization (2023) — passed, margin 57%–43%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Ohio Issue 1 (November 2023) — Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom (2023) — passed, margin 57%–43%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 (share 0.112)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 0.128)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.156)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Procter & Gamble (10000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (17000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: University of Cincinnati (18000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Kroger Co. (20000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] District summary: Ohio's 1st Congressional District encompasses Cincinnati and all of Warren County, with a population of approximately 795,000. It is a D+9 district (per 2026 ratings) that is 68.8% White and 17.5% Black, with a Hispanic population of 4.87%. The median age is 37, median household income is $80,294, and the poverty rat

secondary

Voted yea on H.R.23 (Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (sanctioning the International Criminal Court over arrest warrants for Israeli officials)) on 2025-01-09: Landsman was among 45 Democrats who joined Republicans to sanction the ICC. The vote aligned with his top donor AIPAC's legislative priorities and reinforced his pattern of pro-Israel votes that p

primary · 2025-01-09

Voted yea on S.5 (Laken Riley Act (requiring detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants charged with certain crimes)) on 2025-01-22: Landsman was one of 46 House Democrats to join all Republicans in passing this immigration enforcement bill. The vote broke with the majority of his party and signaled a shift toward more restrictive immigration posit

primary · 2025-01-22

Voted nay on H.Con.Res.38 (War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran) on 2026-03-05: Landsman was one of only 4 House Democrats to vote against halting military action in Iran. His top donor (AIPAC, $385,808) supports robust U.S.-Israel military coordination against Iran. He later told constituents he tends to be

primary · 2026-03-05

Voted yea on H.R.3746 (Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (debt ceiling deal negotiated by President Biden and Speaker McCarthy)) on 2023-05-31: Landsman voted to prevent a potentially catastrophic default, citing the need to protect Social Security, Medicare, and SNAP benefits for his Southwest Ohio constituents. While 165 Democrats supported the bill, 46 pr

primary · 2023-05-31

Voted yea on H.Res.845 (Censuring Representative Rashida Tlaib for comments on the Israel-Hamas war) on 2023-11-07: Landsman was one of just 22 House Democrats to vote to censure Tlaib, the only Palestinian American in Congress. He later told Religion News Service the vote was about the 'survival of the state of Israel.' The vote put him sharply at odds with

primary · 2023-11-07

Voted yea on H.R.6126 (Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (providing $14.3 billion in military aid to Israel with offsetting IRS cuts)) on 2023-11-02: Landsman was one of only 12 House Democrats to vote for the Israel aid package. He publicly criticized Speaker Johnson for attaching the IRS funding cut, saying he should 'pull this bill & a

primary · 2023-11-02

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities	nay	2026-03-05	aligned
Laken Riley Act (requiring detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants	yea	2025-01-22	deviating
Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (sanctioning the International Criminal Cou	yea	2025-01-09	deviating
Censuring Representative Rashida Tlaib for comments on the Israel-Hamas war	yea	2023-11-07	deviating
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (providing $14.3 billion i	yea	2023-11-02	mixed
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (debt ceiling deal negotiated by President Bid	yea	2023-05-31	aligned

Last contradiction analysis: Never

platform_vs_disclosure 90/100

Platform: "As a Cincinnati city councilman, Greg Landsman introduced five reforms 'aimed at restoring public trust in government,' including an ethics commission"

Vote: on "Rep. Greg Landsman failed to report more than 87 financial transactions within the legally required "

Landsman built his political brand on government ethics reform and financial transparency, yet failed for months to disclose over 87 personal stock trades as required by the STOCK Act — the very type of behavior he campaigned against. The undisclosed

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →