[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Barry Moore

Republican · Representative, AL ·1

Score Components

21 MODERATE

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

64 → 16

Intelligence Volume 10%

51 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 74.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White alone, not Hispanic or Latino: 74.2%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population: 735,406

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $66,291

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Alabama Amendment 1 — Exempt Local Bills from Budget Isolation Resolution (March 2024) (2024) — failed, margin majority no

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Alabama Broadband Internet Infrastructure Funding Amendment (2022) — passed, margin 80% yes to 20% no

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Alabama Amendment 1 — Aniah's Law (Denial of Bail for Violent Felonies) (2022) — passed, margin majority yes

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.12)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.13)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 0.16)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Infirmary Health (Mobile hospitals) (3000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Airbus Americas (Mobile plant) (2000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Austal USA (shipbuilding) (4000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] District summary: Alabama's 1st Congressional District covers the southwestern portion of the state, including Mobile, Baldwin, Escambia, Monroe, and Washington counties. It has a population of approximately 735,406 and a median household income of $66,291. The district is majority White (74.2%) with a significant Black population (16

secondary

Voted yea on H.R. 1 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) on 2025-07-03: Supported Trump's signature tax and spending bill despite CBO projections of $3.3T added to deficits; aligned with donor interests in tax cuts. Constituents booed and chanted 'Shame!' at a subsequent town hall.

primary · 2025-07-03

Voted yea on H.R. 21 (Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act) on 2025-01-23: Voted for legislation mandating medical care for infants born alive after failed abortions; critics note existing laws already cover such scenarios and the bill is designed to stigmatize reproductive healthcare.

primary · 2025-01-23

Voted yea on H.R. 22 (SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act)) on 2024-07-10: Voted to require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote, which critics argue would disenfranchise eligible voters who lack ready access to such documents.

primary · 2024-07-10

Voted nay on H.R. 8035 (Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024) on 2024-04-20: Opposed $61 billion in military aid to Ukraine, citing lack of border security provisions, aligning with the isolationist wing of the House Freedom Caucus.

primary · 2024-04-20

Voted nay on H.R. 3746 (Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023) on 2023-05-31: One of 71 Republicans who opposed the bipartisan debt ceiling deal, citing insufficient spending cuts; later voted for the OBBB which added far more to deficits.

primary · 2023-05-31

Voted yea on H.R. 2811 (Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023) on 2023-04-26: Supported legislation coupling a debt ceiling increase with Medicaid work requirements and SNAP cuts, aligned with Freedom Caucus and Club for Growth donor priorities.

primary · 2023-04-26

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
One Big Beautiful Bill Act	yea	2025-07-03	aligned
Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act	yea	2025-01-23	deviating
SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act)	yea	2024-07-10	deviating
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024	nay	2024-04-20	deviating
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023	nay	2023-05-31	deviating
Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023	yea	2023-04-26	aligned
Respect for Marriage Act	nay	2022-12-08	deviating
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act	nay	2021-11-05	misaligned
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021	nay	2021-02-27	misaligned
Objection to Certification of Arizona's Electoral Votes	yea	2021-01-06	misaligned

Last contradiction analysis: Never

reversal 90/100

Platform: "Moore voted against the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, calling it 'nothing but a liberal Christmas wishlist packed as COVID relief' and 'Pelosi's"

Vote: on "Moore voted in favor of President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, calling it 'the largest tax cut in"

Moore condemned the $1.9T American Rescue Plan as fiscally irresponsible debt-burdening in 2021, yet voted in 2025 for the OBBB which the CBO projected would add $3.3 trillion to deficits—nearly double the ARP's cost—while calling it a 'victory for h

reversal 60/100

Platform: "Moore voted against the Fiscal Responsibility Act, stating 'This is a massive disappointment' that 'promises to saddle Americans with $4 trillion in n"

Vote: on "Moore voted in support of the Limit, Save, Grow Act, which paired a debt ceiling increase with $4.8 "

Moore denounced the bipartisan Fiscal Responsibility Act for adding '$4 trillion in new debt' and 'kicking the can down the road,' yet just weeks earlier voted for the Limit, Save, Grow Act, which also raised the debt ceiling while imposing deep cuts

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →