[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Blake D. Moore

Blake D. Moore

Republican · Representative, UT ·1
Score Components
31 ELEVATED
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
20 → 5
Contradiction Risk 25%
82 → 21
Intelligence Volume 10%
54 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 5.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 70.1%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White alone, not Hispanic or Latino: 83.6%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population (2023): 846,210
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $93,425
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 4 (2018) — Independent Redistricting Commission (Better Boundaries initiative co-chaired by Moore) (2018) — passed, margin 50.3% yes to 49.7% no
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Constitutional Amendment D — Legislature power to amend/repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives and ban foreign influence (voided by Utah Supreme Court) (2024) — voided, margin Utah Supreme Court upheld lower court ruling voiding the amendment; votes not counted
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Constitutional Amendment A — Allow income tax money to be used for all state needs and eliminate state sales tax on food (2024) — passed, margin majority yes
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.13)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.14)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 (share 0.17)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Utah State University (Logan) (4000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: IRS Processing Facility (Ogden) (5000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Hill Air Force Base (21000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Utah's 1st Congressional District covers the northern area of Utah, including Ogden, Logan, Layton, Clearfield, Park City, and parts of Salt Lake City and Davis County. The district has a population of approximately 846,210 with a median household income of $93,425 — more than double the national median. It is predom
secondary
Voted yea on H.R. 29 (Laken Riley Act) on 2025-01-07: Voted for legislation mandating ICE detention for undocumented immigrants charged with theft offenses. Passed with bipartisan support (264-159), and Moore's yes vote was consistent with his Republican conference position.
primary · 2025-01-07
Voted yea on H.R. 1 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) on 2025-07-03: Voted for Trump's signature reconciliation bill with CBO-estimated $2.4 trillion deficit increase. As the first-ever Utah Republican on Ways and Means, Moore was a key figure in shaping the legislation and defended it saying CBO estimates were 'inaccurate.' Constituents booed him and GOP delegat
primary · 2025-07-03
Voted nay (procedural) on H.Res. 863 (Impeachment of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas) on 2024-02-06: Switched his vote from 'yes' to 'no' at the last moment as a procedural move so Republicans could bring the resolution up for another vote. Moore supported impeachment substantively but his vote switch contributed to the 216-214 failure.
primary · 2024-02-06
Voted yea on H.R. 8035 (Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024) on 2024-04-20: Voted for $60.8 billion in Ukraine aid, earning an 'A' grade from Republicans for Ukraine. Voted for every major Ukraine aid package including lend-lease, and stated 'Ukrainians, the reality is they're winning.' A rare consistent pro-Ukraine voice in the GOP.
primary · 2024-04-20
Voted yea on H.R. 3746 (Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023) on 2023-05-31: Voted to suspend the debt ceiling and avoid default, praising the bill's 'commonsense work requirements to SNAP and TANF' and $2.1 trillion in projected deficit reduction. All four Utah Republicans supported the measure.
primary · 2023-05-31
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
One Big Beautiful Bill Act yea 2025-07-03 aligned
Laken Riley Act yea 2025-01-07 deviating
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 yea 2024-04-20 deviating
Impeachment of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas nay (procedural) 2024-02-06 misaligned
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 yea 2023-05-31 aligned
Respect for Marriage Act yea 2022-12-08 deviating
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act nay 2021-11-05 misaligned
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 nay 2021-02-27 deviating
Second Impeachment of President Donald Trump nay 2021-01-13 deviating
Certification of 2020 Presidential Election — Objections to Arizona and Pennsylv nay (on objections) 2021-01-06 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
reversal 90/100
Platform: "Moore stated when voting for the Fiscal Responsibility Act in 2023: 'When I ran for Congress, I committed to use my role in Congress to reverse Washin"
Vote: on "Moore voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) on July 3, 2025, which the Congressional Bud"
Moore campaigned as a fiscal conservative committed to 'reversing Washington's dangerous debt culture' and voted for the FRA citing $2.1 trillion in deficit reduction, but voted for the OBBB in 2025 that the CBO projected would add $2.4 trillion in d
reversal 60/100
Platform: "Moore co-chaired the Better Boundaries initiative in 2017-2018, which led to Utah's Proposition 4 establishing an independent redistricting commission"
Vote: on "By 2025-2026, Moore faced a serious Republican primary challenge from state Rep. Karianne Lisonbee, "
Moore co-chaired the citizen initiative for independent redistricting reform and championed it for years, but faced a primary challenge in 2026 where he distanced himself from the commission he helped create, saying it had 'strayed from its original
platform_vs_vote 30/100
Platform: "Moore voted to certify the 2020 presidential election for Joe Biden on his third day in office, stating 'voting to strip electoral votes from sovereig"
Vote: on "Moore voted against the second impeachment of Donald Trump for inciting the January 6 insurrection, "
Moore voted to certify the 2020 election against his party's majority — a principled stand — but then voted against impeaching Trump for inciting the January 6 attack, arguing process concerns while also demanding 'justice for January 6th.' He later
Last silence detection: Never
In-person town halls and constituent access
207d silent
Expected position: As a sitting congressman, Moore would be expected to hold regular in-person town halls to hear from constituents. His district has significant federal workforce employment (Hill AFB
President Trump's January 2025 full pardons of approximately 1,600 individuals indicted or sentenced for the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack
40d silent
Expected position: Moore voted to certify the 2020 election and stated he 'feared for his life' on January 6. As a member who broke with his party to certify the election, he would be expected to publ
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →