[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Richard McCormick

Richard McCormick

Republican · Representative, GA ·7
Score Components
4 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 10%
41 → 4
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income (Forsyth County): $130,532
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income (Gwinnett County): $101,053
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-born population (Gwinnett County): 27.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Amendment 3 — Conservation Tax Credit (2024) — passed
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Amendment 2 — Temporary Judicial Replacements (2024) — passed
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Amendment 1 — Georgia Tax Court (2024) — passed
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Gwinnett County Public Schools (12000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Georgia's 7th Congressional District encompasses most of Gwinnett County and portions of Forsyth and Fulton counties in Atlanta's northeastern suburbs. It is one of the most diverse and affluent districts in the Southeast, with a majority-minority population driven by large Asian-American, Hispanic, and Black communi
secondary
Voted yea_unverified on H.R. 8281 (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) on 2024-07-10: GA-07 is one of Georgia's most diverse districts, with Gwinnett County at 27.4% foreign-born and a significant naturalized-citizen population; the SAVE Act's documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration risked burdening lawful voters in his dist
inferential · 2024-07-10
Voted nay_unverified on H.R. 8034 (Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024) on 2024-04-20: AIPAC lobbied for the national-security supplemental and its super PAC spent $2.2 million to support McCormick, yet he voted against the Ukraine aid portion, breaking with a top donor on a signature foreign-policy vote while many GA-07 Republican base vo
inferential · 2024-04-20
Koch Industries contributed $5,000 (2023-2024 cycle).
secondary · 2024-12-31
Home Depot employees contributed $5,000 (2023-2024 cycle).
secondary · 2024-12-31
Career total from Real Estate sector: $312,000 (through 2024 cycle, per OpenSecrets).
secondary · 2024-12-31
AIPAC PAC contributed $5,000 directly to McCormick's campaign committee (2023-2024 cycle).
secondary · 2024-12-31
United Democracy Project (AIPAC super PAC) spent $2,200,000 in independent expenditures supporting McCormick's 2022 and 2024 campaigns.
secondary · 2024-11-05
Career total from Health Professionals sector: $1,059,044 (through 2024 cycle, per OpenSecrets).
secondary · 2024-12-31
Richard McCormick filed filing with the SEC on 2014-11-03. Accession number: N/A.
secondary · 2014-11-03
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act yea_unverified 2024-07-10 misaligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 nay_unverified 2024-04-20 mixed
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →