[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Addison P. McDowell

Addison P. McDowell

Republican · Representative, NC ·6
Score Components
5 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 10%
46 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's Degree or Higher: 30.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership Rate: 67.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty Rate: 9.9%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment Rate: 4.7%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Household Income: $68,414
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Bond for school construction (2023) — approved, margin 58.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Constitutional Amendment requiring voter ID (2018) — passed, margin 55.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 10.9)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 12.3)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 15.5)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Cargill (2000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Deere-Hitachi (2500 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Novant Health (15000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Wake Forest Baptist Health (17000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: North Carolina's 6th congressional district is located in the north central portion of the state, encompassing all of Davidson, Davie, and Rowan counties, along with portions of Cabarrus, Forsyth, and Guilford counties. The district has a population of 794,243 (2024), with a median household income of $68,414 and a C
secondary
Voted yea on H.R. 8029 (Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025) on 2025-03-13: Voted for a bill that funds a 10% increase in border patrol agents, a key donor ask from border security contractors.
primary · 2025-03-13
Voted yea on H.R. 8035 (FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2025) on 2025-05-22: Voted to reauthorize Title VII of FISA, expanding warrantless surveillance powers, a stance that contradicts his past criticism of government overreach.
primary · 2025-05-22
Voted yea on H.R. 3746 (Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023) on 2023-05-31: Voted for the debt ceiling bill that imposes work requirements for food stamps, which could affect low-income constituents.
primary · 2023-05-31
Voted nay on H.R. 2670 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024) on 2023-07-14: Voted against the NDAA, which includes a 5.2% pay raise for military personnel, despite his district having a large veteran population.
primary · 2023-07-14
Voted yea on H.Res. 934 (Denouncing the Biden Administration's Open-Borders Policies) on 2025-03-27: Voted to condemn the administration's immigration policies, reflecting his hardline stance on border security.
primary · 2025-03-27
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 yea 2025-07-04 deviating
FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2025 yea 2025-05-22 misaligned
Denouncing the Biden Administration's Open-Borders Policies yea 2025-03-27 deviating
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2025 yea 2025-03-13 aligned
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 nay 2023-07-14 misaligned
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 yea 2023-05-31 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →