[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Ralph Norman

Ralph Norman

Republican · Representative, SC ·5
Score Components
31 ELEVATED
Connection Density 20%
4 → 1
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
100 → 25
Intelligence Volume 10%
54 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: R+27 (shifted D+3 since last redistricting)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: public transit utilization: 0.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 4.8%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,124
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median home value: $249,400
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Black population share: 23.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 65.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 40.2
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 29.5% (10.4% lack a high school diploma)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 76.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 9.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $71,517
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 758,357 (2024 LegisLetter ACS)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: South Carolina Constitutional Amendment — Remove Constitutional Ban on Public Funding for Religious and Private Schools (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 53.2% Yes — 46.8% No
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 0.12)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.13)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.14)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Warren Norman Company (Rock Hill — real estate development, Norman's own firm) (100 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Piedmont Medical Center / MUSC Health (Rock Hill / Fort Mill area) (2000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Nutramax Laboratories (Lancaster, SC — veterinary and consumer health products) (1000 employees)
secondary
Stacey Plaskett related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-010
BillVoteDateAlignment
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 5, 2026) nay 2026-03-05 deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House final passage, July 3, 2025 yea 2025-07-03 misaligned
Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas (March 6, 2025) yea 2025-03-06 deviating
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 7, 2025) yea 2025-01-07 deviating
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($26 billion military aid) nay 2024-04-20 deviating
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($61 billion military aid nay 2024-04-20 deviating
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 nay 2023-12-14 deviating
Objection to Electoral College Certification — January 6-7, 2021 yea 2021-01-07 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
reversal 90/100
Platform: "On July 2, 2025, Norman was a vocal opponent of the OBBBA, calling it 'poisoned by bad spending' and saying it would 'blow up the deficit' and that 'W"
Vote: on "Less than 48 hours later, Norman cast one of the pivotal votes in favor of the OBBBA on July 3, 2025"
Norman publicly blasted the OBBBA as 'poisoned by bad spending' that would 'blow up the deficit' and told NBC News there was 'no scenario' he could support it — then voted yea within 48 hours, later admitting his opposition was performative and he wo
statement_vs_disclosure 90/100
Platform: "On Jan 17, 2021 — three days before Biden's inauguration — Norman texted White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows: 'Mark, in seeing what's happening so"
Vote: on "Norman claims fiscal conservatism and that 'my primary goal today and every day is to get our fiscal"
Norman campaigns as a defender of constitutional values and the rule of law, yet on January 17, 2021 — three days before the presidential inauguration — he texted the White House Chief of Staff urging President Trump to invoke 'Marshall Law' to preve
same_source_inconsistency 30/100
Platform: "Norman previously criticized Biden's administration for being 'asleep at the wheel.' In May 2025, Norman was literally caught falling asleep in his ch"
Vote: on "Norman has refused to hold in-person town hall meetings, drawing a Change.org petition demanding he "
Norman criticized the Biden administration for being 'asleep at the wheel,' then was literally caught sleeping during the late-night Rules Committee hearing on legislation that would strip Medicaid coverage from millions — while Democrats accused Rep
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →