[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Luz M. Rivas

Luz M. Rivas

Democratic · Representative, CA ·29

Luz M. Rivas is the Democratic U.S. Representative (CA's 29th congressional district). The platform has 5 voting records on file (2025-2026) and 46 verified facts on file covering this member's voting positions, financial disclosures, and stated platform commitments.

Score Components
46 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
50 → 10
Donor Influence 15%
23 → 3
Silence Risk 25%
48 → 12
Contradiction Risk 25%
48 → 12
Intelligence Volume 15%
65 → 10
Constituency Deviation 0%
77 → 0
Voting Misalignment 0%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Non-English language at home: 69.6% of households
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median age: 36.5
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment rate: 8.1%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-born population: 41% (301k people)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 26.5%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 65%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population: 734,777 (2024)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median rent: $1,868
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median property value: $727,000
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 24.7%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 40.8%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 12.8% (2024)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $75,811 (2024)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Los Angeles County Measure A — Homelessness Services and Affordable Housing (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 57.9% to 42.1%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: California Proposition 1 — Behavioral Health Services and Bond Measure (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 50.2% to 49.8%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 - Manufacturing (share 0.08)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 61 - Educational Services (share 0.09)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 - Retail Trade (share 0.12)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance (share 0.16)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Los Angeles Unified School District (Valley region schools) (10000 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) legislative_opposition Rivas voted nay on S. 5 (Laken Riley Act) mandating ICE detention for undocumented immigrants charged with theft/violent crimes; voted nay on H.R. 7147…
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) legislative_vote Rivas voted Nay on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) on July 3, 2025, citing 'devastating cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other important social safety…
American Sugar Cane League financial_support Identified as a donor in the 2026 cycle via its PAC.
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative Political Action Committee financial_support Identified as one of the 8 agriculture-related organizations funding her 2026 cycle.
Democrats Win Fund donor $10,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (3 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00894881/
Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building And Construction Trades Council donor $7,500 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00807214/
American Israel Public Affairs Committee PAC donor $10,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00797670/
Defend The Dream donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00771238/
Medicare For All donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00685552/
Elect Democratic Women donor $10,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00685297/
314 Action Fund donor $7,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00633248/
Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00617803/
Vibe PAC (Victory By Investing Building Empowering) donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00570101/
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00513176/
Poder PAC donor $10,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00452276/
Charter Communications Inc. PAC donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00426775/
Chc Bold PAC donor $10,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00365536/
Alliance Of Theatrical Employees PAC donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00344325/
Blue Shield Of California donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00340364/
AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America donor $5,000 to Luz M. Rivas's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00271338/
BillVoteDateAlignment
PROOF Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Water Resources Development Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Ratepayer Protection Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Retire through Ownership Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
GUARD Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Whistleblower Protection Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act Nay 2026-09-03 unknown
Protecting Domestic Mining Act Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require… Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
AGOA Extension Act Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act Yea 2026-08-31 unknown
Last contradiction analysis: Never
platform_vs_vote 60/100
Platform: "Rivas voted Nay on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1, Roll Call 190) on July 3, 2025. She stated the bill 'would enact devastating cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other important social safety programs to provide…
[ Show full platform position ]
Rivas voted Nay on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1, Roll Call 190) on July 3, 2025. She stated the bill 'would enact devastating cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other important social safety programs to provide tax-cuts to the rich,' per her AFL-CIO scorecard rationale.
"
Vote: on "The Big Beautiful Bill raised the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for tax years…"
Rivas voted against the OBBB, which raised the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 — a provision that would have directly benefited homeowners in her district where median home values are $727,000 and California's high state and local taxes burden itemizers. She prioritized opposition to the bill's…
[ Show full analysis ]
Rivas voted against the OBBB, which raised the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 — a provision that would have directly benefited homeowners in her district where median home values are $727,000 and California's high state and local taxes burden itemizers. She prioritized opposition to the bill's Medicaid/SNAP cuts over the SALT relief her constituents would have received, without publicly addressing this trade-off.
statement_vs_disclosure 30/100
Platform: "Rivas voted Nay on H.R. 5371, the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act of 2026 (Roll Call 281) on September 19, 2025, opposing the stopgap funding measure that kept the government operating."
Vote: on "On January 27-28, 2026, Rivas announced that an appropriations package 'including more than $4…"
Rivas voted against the broader CR (H.R. 5371) in September 2025 but later claimed credit for community project funding signed into law through subsequent appropriations. However, she voted Aye on the specific CJS/Energy/Water appropriations bill (January 8, 2026) that contained her CPF — the contradiction is between…
[ Show full analysis ]
Rivas voted against the broader CR (H.R. 5371) in September 2025 but later claimed credit for community project funding signed into law through subsequent appropriations. However, she voted Aye on the specific CJS/Energy/Water appropriations bill (January 8, 2026) that contained her CPF — the contradiction is between opposing one funding vehicle while celebrating the fruits of another, rather than a direct 'vote no and take the dough' on the same bill.
Last silence detection: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:17:45 GMT (via scheduled run)
Community Project Funding credit-claiming versus votes against broader appropriations packages containing those earmarks
131d silent
Expected position: As a representative who secured and publicly touted over $4 million in Community Project Funding for CA-29 (including $2.06M for crisis response, $1.04M for CSUN technology, and $1M for LA Valley College cybersecurity), Rivas would be…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Expected position: As a representative who secured and publicly touted over $4 million in Community Project Funding for CA-29 (including $2.06M for crisis response, $1.04M for CSUN technology, and $1M for LA Valley College cybersecurity), Rivas would be expected to explain the alignment between her earmark advocacy and her votes on broader appropriations vehicles. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Rivas voted Nay on H.R. 5371 (the September 2025 continuing resolution) and Nay on H.R. 7147 (the January 2026 consolidated appropriations). She subsequently held a press conference on January 27-28, 2026 announcing over $4 million in CPF had been 'delivered' and 'signed into law.' She voted Aye on the specific CJS/Energy/Water appropriations bill on January 8, 2026 that contained her CPF, but her pattern of voting against broader funding vehicles while claiming credit for earmarks within them mirrors the 'vote no and take the dough' pattern identified in other members. Rivas was active on social media and via press releases during this window on immigration, STEM funding, and Supreme Court rulings, but did not reconcile her earmark credit-claiming with her voting pattern. Primary URL: https://www.laccd.edu/news/congresswoman-luz-rivas-delivers-over-4-million-critical-projects-ca-29
ideological & single-issue
Women'S Political Committee Federal, Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, Elect Democratic Women, 314 Action Fund, EMILY's List (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,500 (2026), $7,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
colleagues' leadership pacs
Vibe PAC (Victory By Investing Building Empowering), Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, Medicare For All, Defend The Dream, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026))…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Vibe PAC (Victory By Investing Building Empowering), Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, Medicare For All, Defend The Dream, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
party committees
Chc Bold PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: party committees
other / unclassified
Poder PAC, Democrats Win Fund (amounts: $10,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
Democrats Win Fund Other / unclassified $10,000 (2026)
American Israel Public Affairs Committee PAC Law & lobbying firms $10,000 (2026)
Defend The Dream Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
Medicare For All Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2026)
Elect Democratic Women Ideological & single-issue $5,500 (2026)
314 Action Fund Ideological & single-issue $7,000 (2024)
Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
Vibe PAC (Victory By Investing Building Empowering) Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC Ideological & single-issue $5,000 (2024)
Poder PAC Other / unclassified $10,000 (2024)
Charter Communications Inc. PAC Telecom & media $5,500 (2026)
Chc Bold PAC Party committees $5,000 (2026)
Alliance Of Theatrical Employees PAC Labor unions $5,000 (2026)
Blue Shield Of California Health care & pharma $5,000 (2026)
TopicPriorityAlignmentDeviation
Environmental Justice & Air Quality 92 -40 65
Education & Youth Investment 82 20 60
Civil Liberties & Democratic Governance 80 -35 55
Federalism & California Autonomy 78 -30 50
Immigration & Immigrant Rights 96 55 45
Criminal Justice & Fraud Enforcement 75 40 35
Public Health & Healthcare Access 88 50 35
Economic Security & Cost of Living 90 65 25
Labor & Workers' Rights 85 60 25
Socialism & Political Economy 45 70 20
Water & Natural Resources 70 85 15
War Powers & Foreign Policy 65 90 10
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Contradiction Risk30%Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence20%Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk15%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume15%Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation0%Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment0%Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]
Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains.
$2.6BDonor Contributions
0Money Chains
0Traced Hops
Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

View Full Entity Profile →