[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Emily Randall

Democratic · Representative, WA ·6

Emily Randall is the Democratic U.S. Representative (WA's 6th congressional district). The platform has 5 voting records on file (2025-2026) and 52 verified facts on file covering this member's voting positions, financial disclosures, and stated platform commitments.

Score Components

60 ELEVATED

Connection Density 20%

78 → 16

Donor Influence 15%

30 → 5

Silence Risk 25%

48 → 12

Contradiction Risk 25%

69 → 17

Intelligence Volume 15%

67 → 10

Constituency Deviation 0%

45 → 0

Voting Misalignment 0%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voter Index: D+14

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree attainment: 35.2%

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median home value: $498,600

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,651

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 69.2%

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 5.1%

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 6.3%

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $90,625

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2124 (Opt Out of WA Cares Long-Term Care Program) (2024) — failed, margin 45% for, 55% against (statewide)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2109 (Repeal Capital Gains Tax) (2024) — failed, margin 37% for, 63% against (statewide)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2117 (Repeal Carbon Cap-and-Invest Program) (2024) — failed, margin 38% for, 62% against (statewide)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2066 (Ban on Natural Gas Bans) (2024) — passed, margin 51.2% for, 48.8% against (statewide)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS Retail Trade (44-45) (share 0.1)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS Timber / Forestry and Logging (113) (share 0.08)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS Tourism / Accommodation and Food Services (72) (share 0.12)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS Healthcare and Social Assistance (62) (share 0.16)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS Defense / Federal Government (928110) (share 0.18)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Washington State Government (public administration) (5000 employees)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Joint Base Lewis-McChord (military/defense) (40000 employees)

secondary ✓ Verified

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: MultiCare Health System / Tacoma General Hospital (healthcare) (8000 employees)

secondary ✓ Verified

CLARITY Act vote_position Randall voted Nay on H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act on July 17, 2025, despite her pro-crypto campaign rhetoric.

Kristi Noem competitor Randall co-sponsored articles of impeachment against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in 2025.

Fairshake affiliation Protect Progress (which spent $1.5M on Randall's behalf) is affiliated with the Fairshake crypto super PAC network.

ExxonMobil personal_financial_disclosure Randall sold ExxonMobil stock (valued $1,001-$15,000) from a trust in January 2025, disclosed under STOCK Act.

Stand With Crypto Alliance endorsement_rating Randall completed the Stand With Crypto Questionnaire in July 2024 and was rated a 'strong' crypto supporter.

Alphabet personal_financial_disclosure Randall sold Alphabet stock (valued $1,001-$15,000) from a trust in January 2025, disclosed under STOCK Act.

Protect Progress donor Crypto Super PAC Protect Progress spent approximately $1.5 million on independent expenditures supporting Randall's primary campaign in July 2024.

Coinbase endorsement_rating Randall's campaign was rated a 'strong' crypto supporter by Coinbase's Stand With Crypto initiative.

Microsoft donor Microsoft Corp employees contributed $19,740 to Randall's 2024 campaign, listed as a top contributor.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) oversight Randall voted against immigration enforcement funding (Laken Riley Act, DHS Appropriations) and her district houses the Northwest ICE Detention Center where…

US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) oversight Randall voted against FY2026 DHS Appropriations and co-sponsored impeachment of DHS Secretary, while her district hosts the NW ICE Detention Center.

Resistance Political Action Committee donor $10,000 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (3 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00892216/

Courage PAC donor $5,800 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (4 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00836304/

Equality Project donor $12,500 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (6 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00785899/

La Bamba PAC donor $10,000 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00753947/

Truth To Power donor $5,000 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00747766/

Medicare For All donor $5,000 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00685552/

Elect Democratic Women donor $5,000 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00685297/

Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC donor $10,000 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00617803/

Progressive Turnout Project donor $8,500 to Emily Randall's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (5 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00580068/

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United…	Nay	2026-09-16	unknown
Ratepayer Protection Act	Yea	2026-09-16	unknown
Water Resources Development Act	Yea	2026-09-16	unknown
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood…	Nay	2026-09-16	unknown
PROOF Act	Nay	2026-09-16	unknown
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act	Yea	2026-09-16	unknown
Retire through Ownership Act	Yea	2026-09-16	unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United…	Nay	2026-09-15	unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing…	Nay	2026-09-15	unknown
Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act	Yea	2026-09-15	unknown
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act	Yea	2026-09-15	unknown
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers…	Yea	2026-09-15	unknown
GUARD Act	Yea	2026-09-15	unknown
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes…	Nay	2026-09-15	unknown
Whistleblower Protection Act	Yea	2026-09-15	unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing…	Nay	2026-09-15	unknown
Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in…	Yea	2026-09-15	unknown
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act	Yea	2026-09-14	unknown
National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act	Yea	2026-09-14	unknown
Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act	Nay	2026-09-03	unknown
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require…	Nay	2026-09-02	unknown
Protecting Domestic Mining Act	Nay	2026-09-02	unknown
Providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms…	Nay	2026-09-01	unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period…	Nay	2026-09-01	unknown
In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards	Yea	2026-09-01	unknown
AGOA Extension Act	Yea	2026-09-01	unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period…	Yea	2026-09-01	unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R…	Nay	2026-09-01	unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R…	Nay	2026-09-01	unknown
Local Access to Courts Act	Yea	2026-08-31	unknown

Last contradiction analysis: Never

platform_vs_vote 90/100

Platform: "In July 2024, Randall completed the Stand With Crypto Questionnaire and was rated a 'strong' crypto supporter. Her campaign website stated: 'I believe in the importance of driving technological innovation and economic…

[ Show full platform position ]

In July 2024, Randall completed the Stand With Crypto Questionnaire and was rated a 'strong' crypto supporter. Her campaign website stated: 'I believe in the importance of driving technological innovation and economic growth, including through blockchain technology and the digital asset industry.' The crypto Super PAC Protect Progress spent $1.5 million supporting her primary campaign.

Vote: on "On July 17, 2025, Randall voted Nay on H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act — the major…"

[ Show full analysis ]

Randall campaigned as a 'strong' crypto supporter, accepted $1.5 million in crypto Super PAC spending, and publicly endorsed blockchain innovation — yet voted against the CLARITY Act, the flagship crypto regulatory bill. The vote aligned her with progressive Democrats skeptical of industry-friendly regulation but broke with the crypto donors and PACs that fueled her primary victory. The two source hosts differ (standwithcrypto.org vs. dotheysupportit.com), satisfying the independent-outlet requirement.

statement_vs_disclosure 60/100

Platform: "In June 2024, after learning her campaign manager had liked pro-Palestinian social media posts, Randall told Jewish Insider she would 'support Israel's obligation of self-defense and our country's support for that…

[ Show full platform position ]

In June 2024, after learning her campaign manager had liked pro-Palestinian social media posts, Randall told Jewish Insider she would 'support Israel's obligation of self-defense and our country's support for that right,' calling Hamas a terrorist organization that uses 'human shields.' She fired the staffer immediately.

Vote: on "Randall has portrayed herself as a progressive champion, joining the Congressional Progressive…"

[ Show full analysis ]

Randall declared firm pro-Israel support to a Jewish publication while facing scrutiny over her staff's social media activity, but had maintained strategic silence on Israel-Gaza throughout her campaign — refusing to answer questions from progressive outlets. The Stranger reported she 'lost the left' over this episode, with Palestinian organizers withdrawing support. The two source hosts differ (jewishinsider.com vs. thestranger.com), satisfying the independent-outlet requirement.

Last silence detection: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:18:18 GMT (via scheduled run)

Israel-Gaza — silence during the 2024 Democratic primary campaign until confronted by Jewish Insider

260d silent

[ Show full donor-interest summary ]

Expected position: As a Democrat running in a competitive primary to represent a district that includes progressive Tacoma and the Olympic Peninsula, Randall would be expected to articulate a clear policy position on the Israel-Gaza war — one of the most salient issues for Democratic primary voters in 2024. Her opponent Hilary Franz had taken public positions, and the district's retiring incumbent Derek Kilmer had a moderate pro-Israel record. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Randall was highly active throughout this period: she campaigned vigorously, raised nearly $2 million, secured major endorsements (Sen. Patty Murray, Rep. Marilyn Strickland), and gave interviews on healthcare, education, and reproductive rights. However, The Stranger reported she 'kept quiet on Israel' during her entire campaign and 'did not respond to The Stranger's question about her silence on the issue.' She only articulated a position after Jewish Insider contacted her about her campaign manager's social media activity — at which point she fired the staffer and declared firm support for Israel. Progressives criticized her for allowing the pro-Israel stance to be her first public statement on the war. Primary URL: https://www.thestranger.com/news/2024/06/28/79578010/congressional-candidate-emily-randall-loses-the-left-after-taking-a-pro-israel-stance

colleagues' leadership pacs

[ Show full donor-interest summary ]

Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC), Fair Shot PAC, Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, Dnc PAC, Mainstream PAC, PAC To The Future, M-PAC, Victory Now PAC, Inland Empire Strikes PAC; The, Medicare For All, La Bamba PAC, Courage PAC, Truth To Power (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $8,500 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $7,500 (2026), $10,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2024), $5,800 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs

ideological & single-issue

Progressive Turnout Project, No Vote Left Behind, Human Rights Campaign, Elect Democratic Women, Equality Project, EMILY's List, Equality PAC (amounts: $8,500 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $7,050 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000…

[ Show full donor-interest summary ]

party committees

Chc Bold PAC, New Democrat Coalition Action Fund, Lgbtq Victory Fund Federal PAC (amounts: $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $8,500 (2024)) — interest area: party committees

other / unclassified

Poder PAC, Lesbian PAC, Resistance Political Action Committee (amounts: $10,000 (2024), $10,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified

Resistance Political Action Committee Other / unclassified $10,000 (2026)

Courage PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,800 (2024)

Equality Project Ideological & single-issue $10,000 (2026)

La Bamba PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $10,000 (2024)

Truth To Power Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)

Medicare For All Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2026)

Elect Democratic Women Ideological & single-issue $5,000 (2024)

Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $10,000 (2026)

Progressive Turnout Project Ideological & single-issue $8,500 (2024)

Fair Shot PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)

Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC) Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)

Equality PAC Ideological & single-issue $10,000 (2026)

Inland Empire Strikes PAC; The Colleagues' leadership PACs $10,000 (2024)

America Needs New Innovation And Energy PAC Oil, gas & mining $5,000 (2024)

Lesbian PAC Other / unclassified $10,000 (2024)

Topic	Priority	Alignment	Deviation
Coastal Infrastructure, Maritime Safety & Search-and-Rescue	88	15	73
Federal Workforce & Government Employment Protection	92	25	67
Veterans Affairs & Military Community Services	82	55	35
Immigration & Border Enforcement	55	70	22
Healthcare Access & Rural Health Services	85	68	20
Federal Budget & Deficit / Reconciliation Spending	65	70	15
Digital Assets & Financial Technology Regulation	35	50	15
Housing Affordability & Homelessness	75	65	15
ICE Detention Oversight & Northwest Detention Center	60	85	12
Environmental Protection & Puget Sound Restoration	78	75	10
Tribal Sovereignty & Treaty Rights	70	72	10
Reproductive Rights & Women's Health	80	78	8

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Contradiction Risk	30%	Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence	20%	Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk	15%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume	15%	Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation	0%	Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment	0%	Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]

Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains.

$3.4BDonor Contributions

0Money Chains

0Traced Hops

Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

<iframe src="/api/cost-embed/11192" width="100%" height="400" frameborder="0" style="border:1px solid #1e2733;border-radius:6px;"></iframe>

View Full Entity Profile →