[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Marilyn Strickland

Marilyn Strickland

Democratic · Representative, WA ·10
Score Components
10 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
18 → 5
Intelligence Volume 10%
54 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: D+17
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 5.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $1,789
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median property value: $485,400
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Spanish-language households: 49,644
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Korean-language households: 9,439
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: foreign-born population: 11.5% (89,400 people)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Asian (Non-Hispanic) population share: 7.5% (58,600 people)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 13.6% (105,000 people)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 62.1%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 36.8
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 32.1%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 62.3%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 6.5% (LegisLetter) / 9.45% (Data USA 2024)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $94,427
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 777,317 (2024)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Washington Initiative 2117 — Repeal Cap-and-Trade Program (2024) (2024) — failed, margin 38% Yes — 62% No
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.12)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 (share 0.14)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.16)
secondary
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (March 2026) nay 2026-03-27 aligned
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 2026) yea 2026-03-05 deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House passage, May 2025; Senate amendment, nay 2025-07-03 aligned
Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (ICC Sanctions, January 2025) nay 2025-01-09 mixed
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 2025) nay_unverified 2025-01-07 aligned
SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, July 2024) nay 2024-07-10 aligned
National Security Supplemental (Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan — April 2024) yea 2024-04-20 aligned
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (Standalone GOP bill, February 2 yea 2024-02-06 aligned
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "Strickland positions herself as a progressive Democrat, earning a 92% AFL-CIO score (2025), a 100% CWA lifetime score, and voting consistently with la"
Vote: on "Strickland's top donor by far is AIPAC ($145,379 in 2023-2024), with Pro-Israel as her single larges"
Strickland maintains a near-perfect progressive voting record on domestic policy (92% AFL-CIO, 100% CWA), yet her top donor is AIPAC ($145,379), and she broke with the Biden administration to vote for the GOP standalone Israel aid bill. Progressive a
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →