[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Marlin A. Stutzman

Republican · Representative, IN ·3

Score Components

28 ELEVATED

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

10 → 3

Contradiction Risk 25%

82 → 21

Intelligence Volume 10%

53 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median age: 37.5

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment rate: 4.4%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-born population: ~3%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: U.S. citizenship rate: ~97%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 81.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population: 762,957 (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median home value: $201,600

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 25.5%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 74.0%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 8.5%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $70,696 (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Indiana Senate Enrolled Act 1 — Abortion ban with limited exceptions (August 2022) (2022) — passed, margin enacted by legislature; passed both chambers on party-line votes

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 11 - Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (share 0.05)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 - Retail Trade (share 0.11)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance (share 0.15)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 - Manufacturing (share 0.22)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Maple Leaf Farms (Leesburg) (1500 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Raytheon / RTX (Fort Wayne facility) (2000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Lutheran Health Network (Fort Wayne) (3700 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: General Motors Fort Wayne Assembly (Roanoke) (4000 employees)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (Farm Bill) — On Passage	yea	2026-04-30	mixed
Department of Homeland Security Short-Term Funding Extension — Ensuring Governme	yea	2026-01-30	mixed
Rescissions Act of 2025 — On Passage	yea	2025-07-18	aligned
One Big Beautiful Bill Act — On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment	yea	2025-07-03	misaligned
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act — On Passage	yea	2025-04-10	mixed
Laken Riley Act — On Passage	yea	2025-01-07	mixed

Last contradiction analysis: Never

reversal 90/100

Platform: "Stutzman posted on X on July 1, 2025 that the Senate's changes to the One Big Beautiful Bill included 'unacceptable increases to the national debt and"

Vote: on "On July 3, 2025, Stutzman voted Yea on final passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill. On July 5, he to"

Stutzman publicly condemned the Senate's OBBB changes for including 'unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit' on July 1, then within 96 hours voted for final passage and celebrated it as 'the best bill I've ever voted on in Congre

position_evolution 60/100

Platform: "In 2013-2014, Stutzman led a conservative revolt to split the farm bill, famously calling the combination of food stamps and farm programs an 'unholy "

Vote: on "On April 30, 2026, Stutzman voted Yea on the 2026 Farm Bill (H.R. 7567, 224-200), praising it on the"

Stutzman built his early congressional brand on splitting SNAP from farm programs, calling the combined bill an 'unholy alliance' and being the only Indiana Republican to vote against the 2014 farm bill. By 2026, he voted for a farm bill that recombi

same_source_inconsistency 30/100

Platform: "In December 2014, Stutzman initially voted 'no' on the procedural rule for the $1.1 trillion 'cromnibus' spending bill, then switched his vote to 'yes"

Vote: on "On July 3, 2025, Stutzman voted Yea on final passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill. On July 5, he to"

[auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] In 2014, Stutzman accused GOP leadership of misleading him on a spending bill and expressed being 'surprised and disappointed' after his vote was leveraged. A decade later, Stutzman's OBBB

Last silence detection: Never

Constituent in-person town halls and direct public accessibility in IN-03

88d silent

Expected position: As the representative of a working-class district with median household income of $70,696 and significant healthcare concerns, Stutzman would be expected to hold in-person town hall

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →