[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Bradley Scott Schneider

Bradley Scott Schneider

Democratic · Representative, IL ·10
Score Components
26 ELEVATED
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
82 → 21
Intelligence Volume 10%
53 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 5.8%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 75.0%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 47.0%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population (2024 est.): 753,708
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $107,371
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Illinois Advisory Questions — IVF Insurance Coverage and Election Worker Protections (non-binding) (2024) — passed, margin majority yes on both
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Illinois Advisory Question — Additional 3% Tax on Income over $1 Million for Property Tax Relief (non-binding) (2024) — passed, margin majority yes
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Illinois Amendment 1 — Right to Collective Bargaining (Constitutional Amendment) (2022) — passed, margin 58.7% yes to 41.3% no
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.12)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 52 (share 0.12)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.16)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Allstate Insurance (Northbrook) (45000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Baxter Healthcare (Deerfield) (60000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Walgreens Boots Alliance (Deerfield) (25300 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: AbbVie Inc. (North Chicago) (50000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Illinois's 10th Congressional District covers the northern suburbs of Chicago in Lake, Cook, and McHenry counties, including Highland Park, Waukegan, Deerfield, Northbrook, Buffalo Grove, Wheeling, and Mundelein. The district is 99.7% urban with a population of approximately 753,708 and a median household income of $
secondary
Voted nay on H.R. 1 (119th) / One Big Beautiful Bill Act (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) on 2025-07-03: Opposed Trump's signature tax and spending bill. Held a town hall calling it the 'big bad bill,' fielding constituent concerns about cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and climate provisions. All House Democrats voted no; bill passed 218-214.
primary · 2025-07-03
Voted nay on H.R. 22 (SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act)) on 2025-04-10: Voted against requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote, aligning with his record as a voting rights advocate and co-sponsor of H.R. 1 (For the People Act).
primary · 2025-04-10
Voted nay on H.R. 21 (Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act) on 2025-01-23: Voted against legislation imposing criminal penalties on healthcare practitioners in failed abortion cases — consistent with his SBA Pro-Life America scorecard showing he has 'consistently voted to prevent protections for the unborn.'
primary · 2025-01-23
Voted not voting on H.R. 29 / S. 5 (Laken Riley Act) on 2025-01-07: Missed the vote due to a hemorrhage in his eye requiring emergency medical attention, but stated he would have voted 'no,' arguing the bill 'threatens to make us LESS SAFE by impeding on the federal government's ability to prioritize detention.'
primary · 2025-01-07
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
One Big Beautiful Bill Act nay 2025-07-03 deviating
SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) nay 2025-04-10 deviating
Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act nay 2025-01-23 deviating
Laken Riley Act not voting 2025-01-07 deviating
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 yea 2024-04-20 deviating
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (House GOP standalone vers nay 2023-11-02 misaligned
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 yea 2023-05-31 deviating
Respect for Marriage Act yea 2022-12-08 deviating
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act yea 2021-11-05 deviating
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 yea 2021-02-27 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 90/100
Platform: "Schneider co-leads the bipartisan SALT Deductibility Act to fully repeal the $10,000 SALT deduction cap, framing it as providing relief to 'working fa"
Vote: on "Both liberal and conservative tax policy groups (Tax Foundation; Institute on Taxation and Economic "
Schneider frames SALT cap repeal as tax relief for 'working families' and 'middle-class families,' but nonpartisan tax analyses from both liberal and conservative groups show that 86% of the benefits of full repeal would go to the top 5% of earners,
reversal 60/100
Platform: "Schneider voted against the House GOP Israel aid bill (H.R. 6126) in November 2023, calling it 'terribly flawed, weak and dangerous' because it condit"
Vote: on "Schneider is the single largest recipient of Pro-Israel contributions in the House ($1,336,589 caree"
Schneider voted against the November 2023 GOP Israel aid bill, generating headlines that he 'voted against Israel' — yet he is the House's single largest recipient of Pro-Israel contributions, attended Netanyahu's address when other Jewish Democrats
reversal 30/100
Platform: "In his 2012 primary campaign, Schneider criticized the 'distorting, shadowy influence of super PACs' and said he would ask them to stay out of the rac"
Vote: on "Two weeks later at a campaign forum, Schneider shifted his stance, saying he would accept help from "
Schneider criticized super PACs as a 'distorting, shadowy influence' in February 2012, but reversed his position just two weeks later, citing electoral pragmatism: 'There are no moral victories in elections.' He now operates his own leadership PAC al
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →