[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Emilia Strong Sykes

Democratic · Representative, OH ·13

Score Components

10 MODERATE

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

18 → 5

Intelligence Volume 10%

50 → 5

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median property value: $206,300

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 67.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic or Latino (any race): 3.0%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Black or African American alone (non-Hispanic): 12.3%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White alone (non-Hispanic): 76.3%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 34.1%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 8.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $70,696

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Ohio Issue 1: Citizens Redistricting Commission (2024) — failed, margin 46.3% Yes – 53.7% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Ohio Issue 2: Recreational Marijuana Legalization (2023) — passed, margin 57% Yes – 43% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Ohio Issue 1: Abortion Rights Constitutional Amendment (2023) — passed, margin 57% Yes – 43% No

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 61 (share 8.5)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 11.8)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 (share 14.6)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 16.4)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: University of Akron (3000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Akron Children's Hospital (6000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Cleveland Clinic Akron General (3500 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (3000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Summa Health (11000 employees)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
FISA Section 702 Reauthorization Act of 2026 (three-year warrantless surveillanc	nay	2026-04-29	misaligned
Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026 (bill to end 43-day gover	nay	2025-11-12	mixed
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Trump tax-and-spending reconciliation package)	nay	2025-05-22	aligned
Laken Riley Act (mandatory ICE detention for non-citizens charged with theft)	yea	2025-01-22	deviating
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (standalone Israel aid)	nay	2024-02-06	deviating
Disapproving D.C. Council's Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment	nay	2023-04-19	deviating

Last contradiction analysis: Never

same_source_inconsistency 30/100

Platform: "On April 12, 2024, Sykes voted for H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, reauthorizing Section 702 of FISA with reforms. She"

Vote: on "On April 29, 2026, Sykes voted against S.1318, a Republican-led reauthorization of Section 702 of FI"

[auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Sykes voted to reauthorize Section 702 surveillance in April 2024, then voted against reauthorizing the same authority in April 2026 — both involving the same statutory FISA Section 702 su

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →