[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Dina Titus

Democratic · Representative, NV ·1

Score Components

4 LOW

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

0 → 0

Contradiction Risk 25%

0 → 0

Intelligence Volume 10%

42 → 4

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic/Latino share: 32%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population: 784,000

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $61,000

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Question 3 - Open Primary Elections Amendment (2022) — failed, margin 52%-48%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Question 6 - Renewable Energy Standards Amendment (2020) — passed, margin 59%-41%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 561 (Administrative and Support Services) (share 0.1)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 722 (Food Services and Drinking Places) (share 0.15)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 721120 (Casino Hotels) (share 0.2)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Wynn Resorts (10000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Station Casinos (12000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Las Vegas Sands Corp. (10000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Caesars Entertainment (30000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Top employer: MGM Resorts International (55000 employees)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] District summary: Nevada's 1st congressional district encompasses much of Las Vegas and parts of North Las Vegas. The economy is dominated by hospitality and gaming, anchored by the Las Vegas Strip. Tourism, conventions, and entertainment drive employment, with major resort-casinos as top employers. The district is racially and ethnic

secondary

Voted nay on H.R. 6395 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021) on 2020-07-21: She voted against the NDAA, breaking from the majority of House Democrats (139 yes, 51 no) and aligning with the progressive wing's calls to reduce military spending. The district includes Nellis Air Force Base, but her vote reflected ideological opposition to the

primary · 2020-07-21

Voted yea on H.R. 5430 (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act) on 2019-12-19: Rep. Titus voted for USMCA despite strong opposition from the Culinary Workers Union, a key donor representing thousands of her constituents in the Las Vegas hospitality industry. The union warned the deal lacked enforceable labor protections. The vote illustrate

primary · 2019-12-19

During the 2023-2024 cycle, labor unions, including the Laborers Union ($20,000) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ($15,000), were among Rep. Titus's largest donors.

secondary · 2024-01-01

In the 2024 election cycle, the casino/gambling industry was Rep. Titus's top contributor sector, with Station Casinos donating $27,900 and MGM Resorts International donating $25,000.

secondary · 2024-01-01

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021	nay	2020-07-21	deviating
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act	yea	2019-12-19	deviating

Last contradiction analysis: Never

No contradictions detected

Last silence detection: Never

No active silences

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →