[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Shri Thanedar

Shri Thanedar

Democratic · Representative, MI ·13
Score Components
36 HIGH
Connection Density 20%
24 → 5
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
100 → 25
Intelligence Volume 10%
60 → 6
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
By voting with the unanimous Democratic block on H.R. 4, Thanedar successfully maintained his AFL-CIO 'Right' rating without having to break with his party or donors, unlike his July 2025 vote on H.R. 3633.
primary · 2025-06-12
The House vote on H.R. 4 (June 12, 2025) resulted in a 214–212 passage with zero Democratic defections (0 Yeas, 208 Nays). Representative Thanedar's Nay vote was indistinguishable from the unanimous position of the Democratic caucus.
primary · 2025-06-12
Only a small minority of House Democrats—likely fewer than 10—voted for H.R. 4, further confirming that Thanedar's nay was the default partisan position, not a distinct act of labor solidarity.
primary · 2025-06-12 ✓ Verified
H.R. 1 was rejected by all 212 House Democrats, making Thanedar's nay vote indistinguishable from party discipline and providing no signal about his personal commitment to labor.
secondary · 2025-05-22
Verifying the AFL‑CIO's vote recommendation on H.R. 3633 is a necessary precondition for assessing whether Thanedar's yea vote (if confirmed) would represent a departure from his prior labor alignment.
secondary · 2025
The established fact set contains no primary‑source documentation—such as an AFL‑CIO legislative scorecard, official vote recommendation, or press release—confirming the union's specific position on H.R. 3633; the only reference is an unverified inference that the AFL‑CIO opposed the bill.
secondary · 2025
Thanedar's votes on H.R. 1 and H.R. 4 aligned with the AFL-CIO's position, but both were overwhelmingly partisan votes where nearly all House Democrats voted the same way, making them weak proof of a personal labor allegiance rather than party-line voting.
secondary · 2025
The AFL-CIO argued that the CLARITY Act would weaken oversight of crypto markets and potentially endanger retirement savings, but the union's specific vote recommendation on H.R. 3633 has not been independently documented in the established fact set.
secondary · 2025
Stand With Crypto rated Thanedar 'strongly supportive' and a pro-crypto PAC spent $1 million on media endorsements for him, while his campaign realized a $1.3 million gain from a Bitcoin ETF—together establishing a documented financial relationship between Thanedar and the digital asset industry.
secondary · 2024-07-26
Thanedar's estimated net‑worth ranking in Congress oscillated between 28th and 37th during 2025, driven primarily by fluctuations in his publicly traded stock and crypto portfolio rather than changes in core private wealth.
secondary · 2025
As of July 2025, Quiver Quantitative estimated Thanedar's net worth at $41.5 million with approximately $8.1–$8.2 million invested in publicly traded assets that the platform tracks in real time.
secondary · 2025-07-17
Representative Shri Thanedar's 2023 financial disclosure form filed with the House Clerk reported a net‑worth range between approximately –$17.6 million and $27.5 million, illustrating the wide bands inherent in congressional financial reporting.
primary · 2023
Quiver Quantitative's live net‑worth tracker for members of Congress acknowledges that its estimates exclude the value of the individual's primary residence and any outstanding liabilities, and that estimates of private holdings are updated only on an annual basis.
primary · 2025
The H.R. 3633 vote, occurring over a year after his campaign's Bitcoin ETF profit, would indicate that his crypto alignment was not a one-time transaction but a sustained legislative relationship with the digital asset industry.
inferential · 2025-07-17
If the yea vote is confirmed, Thanedar would have defied AFL-CIO's key vote recommendation for the first time in the 119th Congress, having previously voted with labor on H.R. 1 and H.R. 4, marking a significant shift toward donor-aligned crypto advocacy at the expense of union and working-class interests.
inferential · 2025-07-17
Thanedar's campaign's $1.3 million profit from the Grayscale Bitcoin ETF, realized by April 2024, preceded a $1 million crypto PAC media campaign endorsing him, suggesting a mutually reinforcing financial relationship that may have influenced his legislative stance on digital asset deregulation.
secondary · 2025-07-17
The censure vote was Thanedar's first significant floor vote on Israel-related matters after the October 7 attack and his AIPAC-sponsored Israel trip, and it preceded AIPAC's shift to spending $2.3 million to support his 2024 primary.
secondary · 2023-11-07
In the weeks prior, Thanedar publicly characterized Tlaib's statements as antisemitic, setting the stage for his censure vote.
secondary · 2023-10
On November 7, 2023, Representative Shri Thanedar voted yea on H.Res.845, joining 21 other Democrats to censure Representative Rashida Tlaib; 188 Democrats voted nay.
primary · 2023-11-07
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Non-English primary language — Arabic households: 26,672
secondary
Grayscale Bitcoin ETF (GBTC) related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-008
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-008
Fairshake PAC related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-008
Stand With Crypto Alliance related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-008
AIPAC / United Democracy Project related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-008
Blue Wave Action PAC related Connection documented in FINDING-2026-008
BillVoteDateAlignment
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act) yea_unverified 2025-07-17 mixed
Rescissions Act of 2025 ($9.4 billion in spending rescissions including $1.1 bil nay_unverified 2025-06-12 aligned
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Trump tax-and-spending reconciliation, cutting an es nay 2025-05-22 aligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($95 billion foreign aid yea_unverified 2024-04-20 mixed
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (standalone $17.6 billion nay_unverified 2024-02-06 deviating
Censuring Representative Rashida Tlaib for promoting false narratives regarding yea_unverified 2023-11-07 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 90/100
Platform: "On the 2022 campaign trail, Shri Thanedar pledged to 'never to take a dime of corporate PAC money' and tweeted in March 2022: 'I absolutely reject cor"
Vote: on "Since entering Congress in 2023, Thanedar accepted at least $36,000 from corporate PACs including Go"
Thanedar built his 2022 campaign image around a pledge to 'never take a dime of corporate PAC money' and condemning the 'corrupting influence of special interests,' yet once in Congress he accepted tens of thousands from corporate PACs and continued
reversal 90/100
Platform: "As a Michigan state representative in 2021, Thanedar co-sponsored a resolution labeling Israel an 'apartheid' state and calling on Congress 'to enact "
Vote: on "After taking office in Congress, Thanedar traveled to Israel on an AIPAC-sponsored trip in August 20"
Thanedar co-sponsored a 2021 resolution labeling Israel an 'apartheid' state and calling for an end to all U.S. military aid. After facing AIPAC-funded opposition in 2022, he fully reversed: he traveled to Israel on AIPAC's dime, became one of Congre
reversal 90/100
Platform: "In a 2022 statement to Metro Times, Thanedar slammed his primary opponent for taking AIPAC money: 'Allowing special interests to buy politicians is on"
Vote: on "After taking office in Congress, Thanedar traveled to Israel on an AIPAC-sponsored trip in August 20"
Thanedar condemned AIPAC's spending as 'despicable' and 'corrupting' when it was used against him in 2022, saying his opponent 'invited corruption' by accepting pro-Israel money. Two years later, he welcomed and benefited from $2.3 million in AIPAC-l
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →