[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Mark R. Warner

Mark R. Warner

Democratic · Senator, VA
Score Components
19 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
20 → 5
Contradiction Risk 25%
36 → 9
Intelligence Volume 10%
47 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment Rate: 3%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: 2024 Presidential Vote (Harris): 54%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's Degree or Higher: 40.2%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty Rate: 9.9%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Household Income: $87,249
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Virginia Constitutional Amendment - Property Tax Exemption for Veterans (2024) — passed, margin broad support
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Virginia Constitutional Amendment - Transportation Funds (2024) — passed, margin broad support
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 51 - Information (Tech/Telecom) (share 0.05)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 - Manufacturing (Defense) (share 0.06)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 - Public Administration (Federal Government) (share 0.12)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (share 0.15)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Northrop Grumman (10000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Huntington Ingalls Industries (25000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Federal Government (including Pentagon) (140000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Virginia is a statewide Senate constituency with 8.7 million residents. The state has a strong federal government and defense sector presence, with 20.1% of the workforce employed in government (significantly above national average). Virginia voted 62% for Biden in 2020 and 54% for Harris in 2024, indicating strong D
secondary
Voted yea on H.R. 6570 (TikTok Divestment Act) on 2024-03-13: Warner led bipartisan coalition pushing TikTok ban. While framed as national security, the legislation raises concerns about speech censorship precedent. Virginia's strong Democratic lean suggests constituent preference for measured tech regulation rather than outright bans. Warner's aggressive pu
primary · 2024-03-13
Voted yea on S. 686 (RESTRICT Act) on 2023-03-07: Warner authored the RESTRICT Act, giving Commerce Department broad power to ban foreign tech products. While marketed as targeting TikTok/Huawei, civil liberties groups warned the vague language could restrict VPNs and enable censorship. Warner's venture capital background in tech investments creates potentia
primary · 2023-03-07
Voted yea on H.R. 7888 (Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (FISA Section 702 Reauthorization)) on 2024-04-19: Warner, as Senate Intelligence Chair, led advocacy for reauthorizing warrantless surveillance powers. The bill did not require the FBI to obtain warrants before searching 702 data for Americans' communications - despite documented FBI co
primary · 2024-04-19
[statement] Congress has done nothing on any guardrails for social media - pushing for tech regulation
primary · 2023-05-21
[statement] Warner stated FISA Section 702 reauthorization was necessary for national security. In recent weeks, I was informed of the decision NSA publicly announced
primary · 2024-04-19
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (FISA Section 702 Reauthorizatio yea 2024-04-19 mixed
TikTok Divestment Act yea 2024-03-13 mixed
RESTRICT Act yea 2023-03-07 aligned
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "As Senate Intelligence Chair, I am concerned about Chinese government access to American data through TikTok - a company that has no option other to r"
Vote: on "Congress has done nothing on any guardrails for social media - pushing for tech regulation"
Warner presents himself as a reformer pushing for tech accountability and privacy guardrails, yet his personal financial portfolio contains $98.6 million in diversified ETF holdings including broad market funds that would benefit from less restrictiv
position_evolution 60/100
Platform: "As Senate Intelligence Chair, I am concerned about Chinese government access to American data through TikTok - a company that has no option other to r"
Vote: on "Warner stated FISA Section 702 reauthorization was necessary for national security. In recent weeks,"
Warner publicly expressed strong concerns about privacy and government data collection when it involved a foreign adversary (TikTok/China), yet simultaneously pushed for reauthorization of warrantless surveillance powers under FISA Section 702 that a
Last silence detection: Never
RESTRICT Act VPN and internet freedom concerns
410d silent
Expected position: As Senate Intelligence Chair and author of the RESTRICT Act, Warner would be expected to address concerns that the legislation's broad language could enable restrictions on VPNs and
FBI warrant requirement for FISA queries on Americans
110d silent
Expected position: As Senate Intelligence Chair who pushed for FISA Section 702 reauthorization, Warner would be expected to address whether FBI should need warrants before searching surveillance data
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →