Pending Review
Subramanyam campaigned on a platform of 'campaign finance reform,' pledging to 'prevent members of Congress from trading individual stocks' and 'support legislation to reform our campaign finance laws to ensure middle‑class families are not drowned out by money that corrupts our elections.' Only 6.45 % of his $2.9 million in campaign funds came from small donors under $200.
Date: 2024-11-25
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Protect Progress (FEC Committee ID C00848440) spent $1,813,504.61 in independent expenditures supporting Suhas Subramanyam's 2024 campaign, per FEC filing FEC‑1848045 (amended November 2024). This is approximately 17 times higher than the $106,947 figure currently in the portal's established facts. The expenditures were disbursed across multiple dates in May–June 2024 and covered digital advertising, direct mail, and voter contact.
Date: 2024-05 to 2024-06
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Stand With Crypto rates Subramanyam as 'Strongly supports crypto' with an 'A' grade, based on his GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act YEA votes and his overall pro‑crypto legislative positioning. He is one of 77 House Democrats to receive the 'A' grade.
Date: 2025-07-17
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam also voted YEA on Roll Call 200 (S. 1582, GENIUS Act) on July 17, 2025. He was among 102 Democrats supporting the bill that passed 308‑122. Combined with his CLARITY Act vote, Subramanyam was 2‑for‑2 on crypto deregulation bills on the same legislative day.
Date: 2025-07-17
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam voted YEA on Roll Call 199 (H.R. 3633, CLARITY Act) on July 17, 2025. The House Clerk's official record confirms 'Subramanyam | Democratic | VA | Yea' at line 386‑387. The vote passed 294‑134 with 216 GOP Yea, 77 Dem Yea, 1 GOP Nay, 134 Dem Nay. The prior 'yea_unverified' designation is superseded by primary evidence.
Date: 2025-07-17
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
The identical collective‑bargaining‑restoration provision (Section 1110) had been stripped from the FY2026 NDAA (S. 1071) on December 10, 2025—one day before the H.R. 2550 vote—because Senate Republicans refused to include it in the bicameral compromise. Subramanyam voted Nay on the NDAA on December 10 and Aye on H.R. 2550 on December 11, demonstrating back‑to‑back labor consistency.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Trump's March 27, 2025 executive order excluded approximately 40 federal agencies and subdivisions from the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute, affecting workers at the departments of Defense, State, Veterans Affairs, Justice, Energy, and parts of Homeland Security, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Interior, and Agriculture. The National Treasury Employees Union described it as 'of unprecedented scope' covering 'some two‑thirds of the federal workforce.'
Date: 2025-03-27
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
H.R. 2550 reached the floor only through a discharge petition—a rare procedure requiring 218 signatures to force consideration over the opposition of GOP leadership. The discharge petition reached the threshold on November 17, 2025, led by a bipartisan group including Reps. Golden (D‑ME), Fitzpatrick (R‑PA), and Lawler (R‑NY). House Oversight Committee Chairman Comer (R‑KY) formally opposed the bill.
Date: 2025-11-17
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam's official statement declared that Trump's executive order was 'another insult to thousands of our neighbors who are civil servants' and that the bill would 'ensure federal workers maintain their right to fight for competitive pay and benefits' and 'retain these hardworking employees who could be making more money in the private sector.' He concluded: 'The Senate must pass this bill as soon as possible to restore workers' rights to thousands of federal employees.'
Date: 2025-12-11
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam also voted Aye on H.Res. 432 (Roll Call 331), the rule providing for consideration of H.R. 2550, on December 11, 2025—the rule vote was the one flagged by the CWA as a key working‑family vote. Both votes are recorded in The Daily Record's member roll‑call archive.
Date: 2025-12-11
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Suhas Subramanyam voted Aye on H.R. 2550, the Protect America's Workforce Act, Roll Call 332, December 11, 2025—the bill passed 231–195 with 211 Democrats and 20 Republicans voting Aye, and 195 Republicans voting Nay.
Date: 2025-12-11
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam's district (VA-10) hosts Northrop Grumman (2,500 employees) and Raytheon Technologies (2,500 employees), both of which benefit from the NDAA's authorization of defense spending. Subramanyam's Nay vote thus crossed the economic interests of these major employers, a tension he did not address in his statement.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
The CWA flagged H.Res. 936 (the NDAA rule) as a key working-family vote and records Subramanyam as voting 'No,' giving him a 'Right' mark. The rule was opposed by the AFL-CIO because it blocked the Norcross amendment that would have restored the collective bargaining protections stripped from the final bill.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Section 1110 (restoring collective bargaining rights for civilian DOD employees) was included in the September 2025 House-passed NDAA (H.R. 3838) but was stripped from the final bicameral compromise (S. 1071). The AFL-CIO supported the September bill but opposed the December rule and final bill because of this removal. Subramanyam voted Nay on the December rule (H.Res. 936) and final passage, aligning with the AFL-CIO's evolving recommendation.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam's official statement cited 'divisive, extreme social-policy riders that target reproductive rights, transgender Americans, and diversity and inclusion programs,' plus his opposition to giving Donald Trump 'a blank check to deploy our service members without congressional approval,' as his reasons for voting Nay. He made no explicit mention of Section 1110 or the collective bargaining provision.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
The bill number cited in the original claim (H.R. 5371) is incorrect. The correct bill number for the final NDAA is S. 1071. The earlier House-passed version was H.R. 3838. H.R. 5371 does not correspond to any NDAA-related measure in the 119th Congress.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Suhas Subramanyam voted Nay on the final passage of S. 1071 (the bicameral compromise FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act) on December 10, 2025, which passed 312–112. He was among 90 Democrats and 22 Republicans who opposed the bill.
Date: 2025-12-10
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Nevada has 15.1% SNAP participation—the ninth highest rate among all states—with approximately 495,800 recipients statewide and an estimated 27,700 Nevadans projected to lose benefits due to new work requirements taking effect May 1, 2026 under the OBBB cuts that H.R. 7567 codified.
Date: 2026-04-28
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Horsford voted FOR the 2014 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642), which passed 251-166, telling the Las Vegas Sun that PILT 'dollars pay for education, law enforcement, infrastructure and other vital social services' in rural Nevada. His 2026 Nay represents a 12-year reversal, almost certainly driven by the $187 billion in SNAP cuts absent from the 2014 bill.
Date: 2014-01-29
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
The NRCC and Nevada Globe framed Horsford's Farm Bill vote as a betrayal of rural Nevada: NRCC spokesman Christian Martinez said Horsford 'showed his true colors, choosing to cater to the radical left instead of delivering for hardworking Nevada farmers who feed and fuel the country.' The Nevada Globe editorialized that 'Nevada farmers do not have the luxury of political games.' This was part of a sustained campaign targeting all three Nevada Democrats (Titus, Lee, Horsford) for their identical Nay votes.
Date: 2026-05-01
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Horsford's SNAP advocacy record is among the most extensive of any Nevada House member: he personally wrote to the USDA Secretary ('half-a-million Nevadans who depend on SNAP'), held a press conference condemning Republican cuts to 'Medicaid, SNAP, and Clean Energy Incentives,' joined Meals on Wheels delivery in November 2025, led a letter to Gov. Lombardo urging a special session to protect SNAP recipients, and previously stated in a 2019 press release that 'the Trump administration is taking food from the tables of our poorest and most vulnerable Nevadans.'
Date: 2025-10-30
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Horsford's district (NV-04) has a poverty rate of 10.4% per Census ACS data (LegisLetter), below the national average of 12.4%—not 13.6% as the original claim asserts. The 13.6% figure cannot be independently verified against Census ACS data and represents a 3.2 percentage point overstatement that inverts the district's relationship to national poverty levels.
Date: 2026-04-21
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Horsford issued no standalone press release or public statement on the Farm Bill vote, as confirmed by a comprehensive search of horsford.house.gov. This silence contrasts with his highly visible SNAP advocacy through other channels, including an October 30, 2025 letter to USDA Secretary Rollins, a press conference condemning the GOP budget, and a letter to Gov. Lombardo urging a special session to protect SNAP.
Date: 2026-04-30
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
Steven Horsford voted Nay on H.R. 7567, the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, on April 30, 2026—the bill passed 224-200 with 209 Republicans and 14 Democrats voting Yea. All three Nevada Democratic House members (Horsford, Titus, Lee) voted Nay.
Date: 2026-04-30
Added: 04 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: 2024 general election result (Subramanyam vs. Clancy): Subramanyam 52.1% – Clancy 47.5%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Mean commute time: 32.6 minutes
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population Asian (Non-Hispanic): 15.5%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population Hispanic: 18.9%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population White (Non-Hispanic): 55.5%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median home value: $674,500
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 77.9%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher (age 25+): 55.9%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate (2024): 3.7%
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income (2024): $162,359
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Virginia Constitutional Amendment (2024) — Expand Property Tax Exemption for Surviving Spouses of Soldiers Who Died in the Line of Duty (2024) — passed, margin 85.4% yes – 14.6% no (statewide)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 61 - Educational Services (share 0.08)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 - Retail Trade (share 0.09)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 - Health Care and Social Assistance (share 0.11)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 - Public Administration (share 0.12)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (share 0.18)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Raytheon Technologies (2500 employees)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Northrop Grumman (2500 employees)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Verizon (5000 employees)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Loudoun County Government (5000 employees)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Loudoun County Public Schools (10000 employees)
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Virginia's 10th Congressional District encompasses Loudoun County, Rappahannock County, Fauquier County, and portions of Prince William and Fairfax counties in Northern Virginia. It is one of the wealthiest and most highly educated congressional districts in the United States, with a median household income of $162,359 and 55.9% holding a bachelor's degree — both roughly double national averages. The district is a hub for federal workers, defense contractors, and the technology sector, anchored by Washington Dulles International Airport. The population is diverse: 55.5% White, 18.9% Hispanic, 15.5% Asian, and 8.5% Black. With a poverty rate of just 3.7% and median home values of $674,500, it is broadly affluent but contains significant economic diversity between the wealthy eastern exurbs and more rural western counties. Subramanyam won his first term in 2024 with 52.1% of the vote against Republican Mike Clancy.
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Voted yea_unverified on H.R. 3633 (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act — crypto framework)) on 2025-07-17: Subramanyam voted for crypto deregulation legislation, consistent with his 'strongly supportive' Stand With Crypto rating. Protect Progress (crypto super PAC) spent $106,947 supporting his campaign. While the crypto industry's agenda of light-touch regulation primarily benefits investors and industry insiders, his affluent, tech-heavy district (55.9% bachelor's degree, high concentration of tech professionals) has a natural constituency for crypto innovation. The vote aligns with both his donor base and his district's tech-forward profile.
Date: 2025-07-17
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Voted nay on H.R. 1 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Trump tax-and-spending reconciliation, adding over $3 trillion to national debt, cutting Medicaid and SNAP)) on 2025-05-22: Subramanyam voted NO and issued a scathing statement calling it 'the One Big Ugly Bill.' His district has a 3.7% poverty rate and $162,359 median income — among the wealthiest in the nation — yet 300,000 Virginia children stood to lose food assistance. The bill passed 215-214, making every Nay vote consequential. While most of his affluent constituents would benefit from the bill's tax cuts, Subramanyam's vote aligned with working families and federal workers in his district. All Democrats opposed the bill.
Date: 2025-05-22
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[disclosure] Only 6.45% of Subramanyam's $2.9 million in campaign funds came from small donors under $200, while 74.19% came from large individual contributions and 12.56% from PACs. Protect Progress (crypto super PAC) spent $106,947 and The Impact Fund PAC spent $584,465 in independent expenditures supporting his candidacy — totaling $691,412 in super PAC support, nearly 24% of his total direct fundraising.
Date: 2024-12-31
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[platform] Subramanyam campaigned on 'campaign finance reform' and pledged to 'prevent members of Congress from trading individual stocks' and be 'a strong advocate for preventing corruption in politics.' He stated he would 'support legislation to reform our campaign finance laws to ensure middle-class families are not drowned out by money that corrupts our elections.'
Date: 2024-11-25
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[disclosure] FEC campaign finance records compiled by OpenSecrets show American Israel Public Affairs Cmte as Subramanyam's top contributor in the 2023-2024 cycle, contributing $37,250 — $32,250 from AIPAC-affiliated individuals and $5,000 directly from AIPAC's PAC. AIPAC Tracker fact-checked his claim, noting $32,943.19 was traceable via campaign finance reports.
Date: 2024-12-31
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
[statement] At an April 13, 2025 town hall in Fairfax County, Subramanyam was asked about taking money from AIPAC. He replied: 'I have zero money taken from…AIPAC has not sent me any money…I have gotten far more money from people who oppose Israel. My vote is not bought in any sort of way.'
Date: 2025-04-13
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Stand With Crypto rated Subramanyam 'strongly supportive' of cryptocurrency legislation, and he completed their questionnaire demonstrating support for comprehensive regulatory frameworks. He voted for the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act, both described as 'very pro-crypto.' Protect Progress spent $4,061,538 total in the VA-10 race — $3,954,591 supporting Dan Helmer in the primary, $106,947 supporting Subramanyam in the general.
Date: 2025-07-17
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam pocketed nearly $80,000 from donors linked to American affiliates of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the fountainhead of India's Hindutva movement. The Bhutada family of Houston, led by long-time Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh USA vice-president Ramesh Bhutada, contributed at least $21,500.
Date: 2024-10-17
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Subramanyam raised $2,905,102 total in the 2023-2024 cycle, with 74.19% from large individual contributions, 12.56% from PACs, and only 6.45% from small donors under $200. Top industries were Retired ($179,198), Lawyers/Law Firms ($127,422), and Electronics Mfg & Equip ($125,641).
Date: 2024-12-31
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
The Impact Fund PAC spent $584,465 in independent expenditures supporting Subramanyam in the 2024 general election.
Date: 2024-11-05
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Protect Progress, a super PAC affiliated with Fairshake PAC (crypto industry), spent $106,947 in independent expenditures supporting Subramanyam's general election campaign.
Date: 2024-11-05
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
American Israel Public Affairs Cmte was Subramanyam's top contributor in the 2023-2024 cycle at $37,250 ($32,250 from individuals + $5,000 from its PAC). AIPAC Tracker confirmed Subramanyam received $32,943.19 via AIPAC per campaign finance reports.
Date: 2024-12-31
Added: 03 May 2026
Pending Review
Suhas Subramanyam filed filing with the SEC on 2022-02-28. Accession number: N/A.
Date: 2022-02-28
Added: 23 Apr 2026
GOBLIN HOUSE
[ Enter Database → ]