[ Enter Database → ]
[ENTITY FILE] SUBJECT-0138 INSTRUMENT ACTIVE
PM
// Subject

Project Maven‌​‍​​‍‌‌​‌‍‌‍​​‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍​‌‌

Pentagon AI weapons targeting initiative; Google then Palantir
Tracked Pentagon AI weapons targeting initiative; Google then Palantir · 3 documented connections
// Editorial summary — AI-generated from public records

The Pentagon's AI initiative to apply machine learning to military targeting. Began with Google in 2017, ended when Google employees petitioned against it and Google withdrew in 2018. Palantir became the successor contractor. Project Maven established the precedent of using commercial AI in lethal targeting decisions. Its transfer from Google to Palantir directly benefited the Thiel network's government contracting position.

Facts on record48
Connections mapped3
Sources cited7
View on Graph → Export CSV ← Entity Directory
Stated vs Revealed
No documented contradictions on file.
Connection Map
Facts (48)
Data Freshness
Fresh Last update: 28d ago · Avg age: 81d
Confidence Tiers: Primary Source — cross-referenced government/corporate filings Pending Review — sourced but not independently verified AI Inference — analytical hypothesis from cross-referencing
Raw Filing Records (30) — unsourced metadata
Pending Review The June 2018 JAIC establishment date creates a documented decision point that cou‌​‍​​‍‌‌​‌‍‌‍​​‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍​‌‌ld explain Maven program restructuring independent of contractor performance issues
Date: 2018-06 Added: 09 Apr 2026
Pending Review The attribution of SEC filings directly to Project Maven represents a data integrity failure that invalidates ti‌​‍​​‍‌‌​‌‍‌‍​​‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍​‌‌meline-based analysis of contractor transitions, as Pentagon programs cannot file corporate disclosure documents
Date: 2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Defense contractors routinely disclose AI and targeting system contracts under sanitized categorie‌​‍​​‍‌‌​‌‍‌‍​​‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍​‌‌s in SEC filings to comply with disclosure requirements while protecting classified program details
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The Q3/Q4 2019 timing window for Project Maven SEC disclosures aligns precisely with the 12-15 month security clearance and contract transition timeline typical for classified defense AI programs
Date: 2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review SEC Material Adverse Change disclosure requirements would mandate Project Maven exposure disclosure within one quarterly reporting cycle if Google retained any ongoing legal or financial liability after withdrawal
Date: 2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Project Maven's litigation absence pattern differs significantly from comparable defense AI programs like DARPA's Explainable AI or Army AI Integration initiatives, which generated standard contractor dispute patterns in public records
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Google's voluntary withdrawal from Project Maven, rather than contract termination by the Pentagon, significantly reduced potential breach-of-contract litigation exposure
Date: 2018-06-15 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Defense contracts involving classified targeting systems typically include mandatory arbitration clauses and classified information procedures that would seal most disputes from public court records
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review JAIC's June 2018 establishment date creates a documented institutional milestone that could explain Maven program restructuring independent of contractor transitions
Date: 2018 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The inference of Maven-JAIC program integration based on corrupted SEC filing data cannot be validated without identifying the actual corporate entities that disclosed Maven exposure in Q3/Q4 2019
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Defense AI contract transitions involving classified targeting systems typically require 12-18 months for security clearance verification, technology transfer, and legal liability resolution, making 15-month gaps structurally normal rather than anomalous
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The logical impossibility of Project Maven filing SEC documents directly indicates either misattribution of corporate Maven disclosures or fundamental data corruption in the source records, invalidating gap-based timeline analysis
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review SEC disclosure requirements for defense contractors mandate material contract disclosure within 90 days of award, making Q3 2019 filings consistent with summer 2019 contract finalization
Date: 2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Defense contractor transitions involving classified programs typically require 6-12 months for security clearance verification alone, separate from technology transfer timelines
Date: 2018-2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The established primary facts contain a logical impossibility: Project Maven, a Pentagon program, cannot file SEC documents, indicating either misattribution of corporate filings mentioning Maven or data corruption in the source records
Date: 2019-06-15 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review If legitimate SEC disclosures about Project Maven occurred in Q3/Q4 2019, they would most likely appear in Palantir, Google/Alphabet, or defense contractor 10-K/10-Q filings as risk factors or material contract disclosures
Date: 2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The established facts contain a data integrity issue—Project Maven cannot file SEC documents as it is a Pentagon program, not a corporate entity, suggesting the original filing attribution is incorrect
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review SEC disclosure requirements mandate material contract disclosure within specific timeframes, making Q3/Q4 2019 filings likely indicators of contract finalization or material change events occurring in mid-2019
Date: 2019 Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review Project Maven's litigation absence contrasts with typical patterns for controversial defense AI programs, indicating potential use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms or classification-based court sealing
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The absence of Project Maven litigation in public court records despite major corporate controversy suggests either successful pre-litigation settlement, sealed proceedings, or strategic case naming that obscures the program connection
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The absence of Project Maven-specific lobbying disclosures is consistent with standard defense contractor practice of lobbying on broader policy categories ('artificial intelligence', 'defense technology', 'military modernization') that encompass classified programs without explicit identification
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The systematic absence of Project Maven contracts in USASpending despite documented Pentagon AI expenditures indicates likely use of Special Access Program procurement or Other Transaction Authorities that bypass standard contract reporting requirements
Added: 08 Apr 2026
Pending Review The SEC filings from Q3 and Q4 2019 warrant examination to identify which specific companies disclosed Project Maven involvement and in what context (risk factors, revenue, contracts)
Date: 2019-06-15 Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review Absence of court records suggests no public litigation involving Project Maven as of the search date, which is notable given the controversy surrounding the program and Google's withdrawal in 2018
Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review No lobbying disclosures found despite SEC filings indicates either: lobbying occurred below disclosure thresholds, was conducted by entities not required to register, or companies involved did not actively lobby on this specific project
Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review The presence of SEC filings but absence of USASpending contract records suggests Project Maven contracts may be classified, handled through non-traditional procurement channels, or the contracting entities are not the same as those making SEC disclosures
Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review No lobbying disclosures found for "Project Maven" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.
Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review No corporate registrations found for "Project Maven" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.
Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review No usaspending contracts found for "Project Maven" in public databases as of 2026-04-07.
Added: 07 Apr 2026
Pending Review Project Maven filed filing with the SEC on 2019-12-20. Accession number: N/A.
Date: 2019-12-20 Added: 06 Apr 2026
All Connections (3)
→ Entity #137
program_component, potential_name_association inferential since 2019
Maven Smart System appears to be a related or component system of Project Maven, sharing the 'Maven' naming convention indicating direct association with the defense AI initiative · Maven Smart System shares the 'Maven' naming convention with Project Maven (the Pentagon's AI/machine learning initiative). The documented absence of Maven Smart System from all corporate databases, combined with the analytical conclusion that it may be 'a trade name, subsidiary, or product line of a larger corporate entity,' suggests Maven Smart System could be related to or derived from Project Maven's technology ecosystem or branding.
→ Entity #94
program_sponsor inferential since 2019
Project Maven is a defense/AI initiative, indicating Department of Defense sponsorship. The analysis notes suggest contracts may be classified or handled through non-traditional procurement channels, consistent with DoD special programs
→ Entity #17
potential_contractor, RELATED_DEFENSE_AI_ECOSYSTEM inferential since 2019
SEC EDGAR filings from late 2019 indicate publicly traded companies disclosed involvement or exposure to Project Maven. Palantir, as a major defense AI contractor that went public and files with SEC, is a likely entity making such disclosures given their known defense AI work · Palantir operates in the defense AI/analytics space alongside Project Maven initiatives. FOIA documents revealed Palantir technology was used by law enforcement fusion centers.
Positioned to benefit (2)
World events where this entity surfaces as a derived beneficiary via documented connections, donor flows, contracts, or market signals. All events →
Contract holder AI Inference Pending evidence 2026-04-15
Honesty Test Primary
potential_contractor relationship to Palantir Technologies — SEC EDGAR filings from late 2019 indicate publicly traded companies disclosed involvement or exposure to Project Maven. Palantir, as a major defense AI contractor that went public and files with SEC, is a likely entity making such disclosur.
Contract holder AI Inference Pending evidence 2026-04-15
Honesty Test Secondary
potential_contractor relationship to Palantir Technologies — SEC EDGAR filings from late 2019 indicate publicly traded companies disclosed involvement or exposure to Project Maven. Palantir, as a major defense AI contractor that went public and files with SEC, is a likely entity making such disclosur.
Sources (7)
2026 AI ANALYSIS government_disclosure Processed
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Project Maven — Parliamentary records (no results) parliamentary_record Processed
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Project Maven — Court records (no results) court_document Processed
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Project Maven — Lobbying disclosures (no results) government_disclosure Processed
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Project Maven — Corporate registrations (no results) government_disclosure Processed
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Project Maven — USASpending contracts (no results) contract Processed
2019-12-20 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Project Maven (2019-12-20) discovery_scope_note Processed