GOBLIN HOUSE
[ Enter Database → ]
Area: Full Workup (one official, all sections) (eo_full_workup)
Filed: 2026-05-03T06:19:35.770Z
Source: External LLM via /handoff/congress (attempt #80998)
Resolved official: Sam T. Liccardo (entity #11194)
Ingest result: 35 facts · 37 sources · 3 silences · 2 contradictions · 5 voting_records · 5 skipped
Single super-prompt covering every per-official research area in one LLM call: donor mapping, silences, contradictions, telling votes, and constituency baseline. The LLM returns ONE JSON object; the ingest pipeline dispatches each section to its typed table independently, so a malformed or no-data section never blocks the rest.
{ "target_official": { "name": "Sam T. Liccardo", "bioguide_id": "L000607" },
"donor_mapping": { "facts": [ { "fact_text": "2024 election cycle: Raised $4,305,313 from primarily large individual contributions (96.07%). Small individual contributions ($200 or less) accounted for only 1.14% ($49,234) of total funds. PAC contributions were 1.67% ($72,050).", "date_occurred": "2024-11-05", "confidence": "secondary", "source_url": "https://www.opensecrets.org/races/candidates?cycle=2024&id=CA16&spec=N" }, { "fact_text": "2023-2024 election cycle: Top industry contributing was Securities & Investment at $798,029. Top contributing organization was Google Inc at $69,150 (including $67,150 from individuals and $2,000 from PAC). Additional top contributors: Stanford University ($68,000), Apple Inc ($58,075), Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy ($50,425), Broadcom Inc ($48,500).", "date_occurred": "2024-12-31", "confidence": "secondary", "source_url": "https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/person/summary?cid=N00054265" }, { "fact_text": "Billionaire Michael Bloomberg contributed a total of $2 million to Neighbors for Results, a Super PAC supporting Liccardo's 2024 congressional bid, via two installments: $500,000 in February 2024 and $1.5 million in August 2024. Neighbors for Results transferred $102,000 to Count the Vote, the Super PAC that funded the Congressional District 16 recount that eliminated Joe Simitian from the general election.", "date_occurred": "2024-08-30", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2024/09/20/sam-liccardos-congressional-bid-collects-another-1-5-million-form-billionaire-michael-bloomberg/" }, { "fact_text": "Neighbors for Results Super PAC also received $50,000 from former NetApp CEO Daniel Warmenhoven and $15,000 from Cypress Semiconductor founder John Thurman Rodgers. The Super PAC spent approximately $563,000 on Liccardo's congressional run.", "date_occurred": "2024-08-31", "confidence": "secondary", "source_url": "https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2024/09/20/sam-liccardos-congressional-bid-collects-another-1-5-million-form-billionaire-michael-bloomberg/" }, { "fact_text": "Q1 2025 (first quarter after receiving Financial Services Committee assignment): 57% of Liccardo's PAC contributions came from industries under his committee's jurisdiction — finance, insurance, and real estate — up from 13% during his 2024 campaign. New PAC donor Citigroup contributed $1,000 after keeping its checkbooks closed during his first campaign.", "date_occurred": "2025-03-31", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00858688/1887017/sa/11C" }, { "fact_text": "Count the Vote Super PAC recount donors (revealed July 2024): Christian Larsen, co-founder of Ripple Labs, contributed $100,000; former NetApp CEO Daniel Warmenhoven contributed $63,500; Permit Power co-founder Nick Josefowitz contributed $2,500; Jonathan Padilla (former Liccardo mayoral campaign staffer who requested the recount) contributed $1,000.", "date_occurred": "2024-07-16", "confidence": "secondary", "source_url": "https://sanjosespotlight.com/campaign-filings-reveal-silicon-valley-congressional-district-16-recount-donors-election-2024/" }, { "fact_text": "LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman hosted a lucrative fundraiser for Liccardo in December 2023, which brought in six figures for the campaign.", "date_occurred": "2023-12-31", "confidence": "secondary", "source_url": "https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/02/money-flows-into-ex-san-jose-mayors-bid-for-house-seat-in-silicon-valley-00133526" }, { "fact_text": "Liccardo Victory Fund (leadership PAC) received contributions including $50,000 from Intuit Inc. 21st Century Leadership Fund, $25,000 from Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company PAC, $25,000 from eBay Inc. Committee for Responsible Internet Commerce PAC, $25,000 from Ally Financial Inc. Advocacy PAC, $25,000 from Stripe Inc. PAC, $12,500 from American Bankers Association PAC (BankPac), and $12,500 from Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America PAC.", "date_occurred": "2025-12-31", "confidence": "secondary", "source_url": "https://congressmachine.com/member/L000607/rep-liccardo-sam-t-d-ca-16" } ], "connections": [ { "donor_entity_name": "Google Inc", "relationship_type": "major_donor", "description": "2024: $69,150 via employee contributions ($67,150 individual + $2,000 PAC) — top contributing organization to Liccardo's campaign committee", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/person/summary?cid=N00054265" }, { "donor_entity_name": "Apple Inc", "relationship_type": "major_donor", "description": "2024: $58,075 via employee contributions — third-largest contributing organization", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/person/summary?cid=N00054265" }, { "donor_entity_name": "Broadcom Inc", "relationship_type": "major_donor", "description": "2024: $48,500 via employee contributions — fifth-largest contributing organization", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/person/summary?cid=N00054265" }, { "donor_entity_name": "American Bankers Assn", "relationship_type": "pac_donor", "description": "2025: $12,500 to Liccardo Victory Fund via BankPac", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://congressmachine.com/member/L000607/rep-liccardo-sam-t-d-ca-16" }, { "donor_entity_name": "Citigroup Inc", "relationship_type": "pac_donor", "description": "2025 Q1: $1,000 via PAC — first contribution after Liccardo's appointment to Financial Services Committee; had not donated during his 2024 campaign", "confidence": "primary", "source_url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00858688/1887017/sa/11C" } ] },
"silences": [ { "topic": "Refused to complete Vote Smart's 2024 Political Courage Test", "expected_position": "Candidates for federal office are expected to provide positions on key issues to help voters make informed decisions. Liccardo's opponent Evan Low and most serious candidates complete this survey.", "window_start": "2024-01-01", "window_end": "2024-11-05", "evidence_summary": "Liccardo was actively campaigning during this period — raising $4.3M, participating in debates, issuing policy papers on his campaign website, and giving media interviews. Vote Smart 'repeatedly' requested his responses. He provided positions on abortion via social media (opposing overturning Roe v. Wade) and made statements on campaign finance reform, but refused to provide positions on Social Security, Medicare, taxes, defense spending, and other key issues despite being an active candidate.", "primary_url": "https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/70450/sam-liccardo" }, { "topic": "Declined to comment on Financial Services Committee PAC donation surge", "expected_position": "As a freshman member of the Financial Services Committee whose PAC donations from regulated industries jumped from 13% to 57% after receiving the appointment, Liccardo would be expected to address the appearance of a pay-to-play dynamic.", "window_start": "2025-04-15", "window_end": "2025-07-25", "evidence_summary": "Liccardo 'did not respond to requests for comment' from OpenSecrets/Stacker regarding the 57% PAC donation surge from Financial Services industries after his committee appointment. During this same period, he was publicly active: voting, introducing legislation (MEME Act, SUNGUARD Act), issuing press releases on DHS funding and impeachment articles against Secretary Noem, and fundraising for Democratic Frontliners in Silicon Valley.", "primary_url": "https://www.northcountrynow.com/premium/stacker/stories/freshman-lawmakers-see-increased-donations-from-industries-under-their-purview,313458" }, { "topic": "Declined to state whether he would reject Leading the Future AI Super PAC endorsement", "expected_position": "A coalition of tech watchdog groups (Oakland Privacy, Tech Oversight Project, Common Cause) publicly called on Liccardo to reject the endorsement of Leading the Future, a pro-AI Super PAC with ties to the Trump administration and companies that work with ICE. As a Democrat representing a progressive district who has positioned himself as a Trump adversary, Liccardo would be expected to address whether he accepts this endorsement.", "window_start": "2026-04-15", "window_end": "2026-04-22", "evidence_summary": "Liccardo 'didn't respond when asked if he would reject Leading the Future's endorsement,' according to San José Spotlight. His spokesperson offered a general statement about supporting AI preemption 'within reason' but did not directly address the endorsement. During this period, Liccardo was actively speaking about AI regulation, exploring legislation for an AI oversight body, and had previously criticized Trump's AI policies.", "primary_url": "https://www.mv-voice.com/technology/2026/04/22/sam-liccardo-at-center-of-ai-regulation-fight/" } ],
"contradictions": { "claims": [ { "claim_text": ""During his time as mayor, Sam Liccardo expanded the police department by over 200 officers, improved officer pay, reduced police vacancy rates and left San Jose with the lowest homicide rate of any major U.S. city." — Campaign spokesperson Gil Rubinstein, September 2024", "claim_date": "2024-09-27", "claim_type": "statement", "source_url": "https://www.ktvu.com/news/san-jose-congressional-candidates-police-claims-disputed-fact-check.amp" }, { "claim_text": "San Jose Police Officers' Association data shows a net loss of 631 department staff between 2011 and 2016 (366 resignations and 265 retirements), which the union attributes to Liccardo's support for Measure B pension cuts. City reports show 960 street-ready cops when Liccardo left office in 2022, down from a peak of nearly 1,400 total sworn staff in 2007. The union says 500+ officers left during Liccardo's tenure.", "claim_date": "2024-09-26", "claim_type": "disclosure", "source_url": "https://sanjosespotlight.com/fact-check-san-jose-congressional-district-16-candidates-cop-police-sjpd-claims-disputed-election-2024/" }, { "claim_text": "Liccardo completed the Stand With Crypto Questionnaire affirming belief that Congress must pass legislation for clear digital asset pathways, opposes de-banking of lawful crypto firms, and co-sponsored the STABLE Act. He declared: 'I believe we need sensible crypto regulation.'", "claim_date": "2025-03-05", "claim_type": "platform", "source_url": "https://www.standwithcrypto.org/politicians/person/sam---t---liccardo" }, { "claim_text": "Liccardo voted against advancing the CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act) in the House Financial Services Committee on June 10, 2025. The CLARITY Act was the flagship crypto market structure bill of the 119th Congress. Liccardo also voted against the bill on final passage (Roll No. 199, 294-134).", "claim_date": "2025-07-17", "claim_type": "vote", "source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3633/all-info" } ], "contradictions": [ { "claim_a_idx": 0, "claim_b_idx": 1, "type": "statement_vs_disclosure", "severity": "medium", "narrative": "Liccardo's campaign claimed he added 200 officers during his mayoralty by counting all 791 hires minus 571 departures (including academy trainees who may not complete training). The police union and city data show net staffing declined during his tenure. The 200-officer figure relies on counting recruits who hadn't yet hit the streets, while excluding the broader context of Measure B pension cuts that Liccardo supported as a councilmember and which the union says drove an exodus of 500+ officers." }, { "claim_a_idx": 2, "claim_b_idx": 3, "type": "position_evolution", "severity": "medium", "narrative": "Liccardo positioned himself as pro-crypto, completing the Stand With Crypto questionnaire, co-sponsoring the STABLE Act, and voting for the GENIUS Act. However, he voted against the CLARITY Act in committee and on final passage — the other major crypto bill of the session. Liccardo explained his opposition by saying Republicans refused to negotiate on conflict-of-interest language, but the split-the-baby posture (yes on GENIUS, no on CLARITY) has made his crypto stance difficult to characterize, with StandWithCrypto rating him 'Neutral' overall." } ] },
"telling_votes": [ { "bill_id": "H.R. 7147", "title": "Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (Senate amendment disposition)", "vote": "nay", "vote_date": "2026-03-27", "roll_call_url": "https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026108", "why_it_matters": "Liccardo voted against the DHS funding bill that included ICE funding. His district is 34.9% foreign-born with large immigrant communities. His vote aligned with constituent interests in a district where immigration enforcement is acutely felt. He went beyond the vote by signing articles of impeachment against DHS Secretary Noem and publicly stating 'I voted against giving another dime to ICE.'", "category": "constituent_aligned" }, { "bill_id": "H.R. 3633", "title": "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act)", "vote": "nay_unverified", "vote_date": "2025-07-17", "roll_call_url": "https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3633/all-info", "why_it_matters": "Liccardo represents Silicon Valley, a global hub for crypto and fintech innovation. Donors connected to crypto (Christian Larsen of Ripple gave $100K to the recount Super PAC; StandWithCrypto, a Coinbase initiative, engages him actively) pushed for regulatory clarity. Liccardo voted against the CLARITY Act despite being a self-described pro-crypto Democrat who co-sponsored the STABLE Act. He cited insufficient consumer protections and conflict-of-interest rules, pitting donor-sector preference for regulatory clarity against his stated demand for stronger safeguards.", "category": "cross_pressure" }, { "bill_id": "H.R. 7744", "title": "Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (initial passage)", "vote": "nay", "vote_date": "2026-03-05", "roll_call_url": "https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026087", "why_it_matters": "Liccardo voted against the initial DHS appropriations bill for FY26. This was a Republican-led funding bill; the Democratic Party largely opposed it. However, Liccardo's district includes communities that depend on federal disaster relief and coastal resilience funding administered through DHS agencies like FEMA, creating cross-pressure between party opposition and constituent material needs.", "category": "cross_pressure" }, { "bill_id": "H.R. 7084", "title": "Defending American Property Abroad Act", "vote": "nay", "vote_date": "2026-03-26", "roll_call_url": "https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026105", "why_it_matters": "Liccardo voted against this bill, likely aligning with Democratic caucus opposition. His district includes a significant number of residents with ties to countries potentially affected by expanded property seizure authorities, and his vote against expanding executive branch powers abroad is consistent with his broader critique of Trump administration overreach.", "category": "party_defection" }, { "bill_id": "H.R. 5103", "title": "Make the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful Act", "vote": "nay", "vote_date": "2026-03-25", "roll_call_url": "https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026101", "why_it_matters": "Liccardo voted against this Republican-led bill addressing DC governance. As a Democrat, this was a party-line vote, but it also reflects constituent interest: his district voted overwhelmingly against Trump and for Democratic governance approaches. The vote illustrates routine party alignment on DC home-rule issues.", "category": "party_defection" } ],
"constituency_baseline": { "baseline": { "district_summary": "California's 16th Congressional District encompasses the heart of Silicon Valley, stretching from the coastal communities of Half Moon Bay and Pacifica through the Santa Cruz Mountains to central San Jose, Palo Alto, and Mountain View. The district is home to approximately 746,000 residents and is one of the wealthiest and most highly educated in the nation, with a median household income of $175,126 and 63.3% of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher. It is a majority-minority district (43.6% White, 31.1% Asian, 19.6% Hispanic) with 34.9% of residents foreign-born. The median home value is $1.85 million and the homeownership rate is just 59.9%, making housing affordability the dominant local issue. The district is solidly Democratic (D+100 per Cook PVI-style ratings) and has been represented by Democrats in Congress for three decades. Key industries include professional/scientific/technical services, manufacturing, and health care. The poverty rate is just 6.48%, well below the national average.", "top_employers": [ { "name": "Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services (sector)", "employees": 75452, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "name": "Manufacturing (sector)", "employees": 50516, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "name": "Health Care & Social Assistance (sector)", "employees": 43140, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" } ], "dominant_industries": [ { "naics": "Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services (NAICS 54)", "share": 0.200, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "naics": "Manufacturing (NAICS 31-33)", "share": 0.134, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "naics": "Health Care & Social Assistance (NAICS 62)", "share": 0.114, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "naics": "Information (NAICS 51)", "share": 0.048, "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" } ], "recent_ballot_measures": [ { "name": "Proposition 36 — Theft and Drug Crime Penalties (Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act)", "year": 2024, "result": "passed", "margin": "68.0% Yes — 32.0% No", "source_url": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/05/us/elections/california-proposition-36-increase-sentences-for-drug-and-theft-crimes.html" }, { "name": "Proposition 33 — Rent Control Expansion (Repeal of Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act)", "year": 2024, "result": "failed", "margin": "38.5% Yes — 61.5% No", "source_url": "https://www.dailybreeze.com/2024/11/07/rent-control-delusions-wont-fix-california-housing-mess-heres-what-to-do-instead/" }, { "name": "Proposition 3 — Constitutional Right to Marriage Equality", "year": 2024, "result": "passed", "margin": "62.6% Yes — 37.4% No", "source_url": "https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-11-05/2024-california-election-results-propositions" } ], "demographic_anchors": [ { "label": "Median household income", "value": "$175,126 (2024)", "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "label": "Median property value", "value": "$1,851,300", "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "label": "Population foreign-born", "value": "34.9% (261,000 residents)", "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "label": "Bachelor's degree or higher", "value": "63.3% of adults", "source_url": "https://legisletter.org/legislator/sam-liccardo-L000607/district" }, { "label": "Poverty rate", "value": "6.48% (national average 12.5%)", "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "label": "Homeownership rate", "value": "59.9%", "source_url": "https://datausa.io/profile/geo/congressional-district-16-ca" }, { "label": "Largest ethnic groups", "value": "White Non-Hispanic 43.6%, Asian Non-Hispanic 31.1%, Hispanic 19.6%", "source_url": "https://legisletter.org/legislator/sam-liccardo-L000607/district" } ] } } }