[ Enter Database → ]
← The Oversight Wall
HIGH secondary Disclosure Gap

Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 Settlement Agreement's deadlines

Michael K. Simpson has accepted documented donations from sectors with material interests in "Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 Settlement Agreement's deadlines" but has no public statement, vote, or hearing record on the topic. Expected position: Simpson represents the district containing Idaho National Laboratory and has served on the Appropriations subcommittee overseeing DOE. The 1995 Idaho Settlement Agreement — negotiated by then-Governor Phil Batt — established legally binding deadlines for removing spent nuclear fuel stored at INL from Idaho by specific dates, including a 2035 final removal deadline. The Department of Energy has repeatedly missed interim milestones under this agreement. As the INL's congressional representative and Energy and Water Appropriations subcommittee member, Simpson would be expected to have a comprehensive accountability record on DOE's compliance with the settlement agreement's fuel removal obligations. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Simpson has been publicly active on INL funding, nuclear energy research, and general energy appropriations, issuing multiple press releases on INL budget allocations and nuclear energy policy. No comprehensive public accountability record specifically addressing DOE's compliance with the 1995 Settlement Agreement's spent nuclear fuel removal milestones has been identified, despite this being the most significant environmental obligation specific to his constituency's relationship with the federal government. Primary URL: https://simpson.house.gov/media/press-releases Days silent: 2191. The constituent is owed an explanation of the official's position.

Entities involved: Michael K. Simpson
Detected: 04 May 2026
Evidence last verified: —
Supporting evidence
No directly attached facts; this gap is derived from connections and structural patterns. See the methodology for how that works.
3 actions you can take
Contact the oversight body
Ask the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to hold a hearing
Target: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
▸ Preview the prefilled message
Subject: Constituent request: hearing on Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 S

Dear Members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,

I am writing to ask the committee to hold a public hearing on the following matter that falls within your jurisdiction: Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 S.

The basis of this request is documented in publicly available evidence summarised here: Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 Settlement Agreement's deadlines.

Full evidence trail with source citations:…
Open this action →
Tip a journalist
Send this to The Lever
Target: The Lever (David Sirota et al.)
▸ Preview the prefilled message
Subject: Tip — Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 Settlement Agreement's deadlines

Hi The Lever team,

Tipping you to a documented accountability gap that aligns with your beat (Money in politics, regulatory capture):

Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 Settlement Agreement's deadlines

One-line summary: Michael K. Simpson has not publicly weighed in on Spent nuclear fuel storage at Idaho National Laboratory and the 1995 Settlement Agreement's deadlines

Full evidence trail with source citations and confidence labels: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/disclosure-gap-congress-s001148-spent-nuclear-…
Open this action →
Support a watchdog
Support Campaign Legal Center, who has jurisdiction over this
Target: Campaign Legal Center
Open this action →
Read how the Oversight Wall derives gaps and what it deliberately does not do — methodology. If you are the subject of this gap or believe the underlying evidence is wrong, please use our corrections process.