[ Enter Database → ]
← The Oversight Wall
HIGH secondary Disclosure Gap

Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-05 constituents and Judiciary Committee jurisdiction

Mary Gay Scanlon has accepted documented donations from sectors with material interests in "Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-05 constituents and Judiciary Committee jurisdiction" but has no public statement, vote, or hearing record on the topic. Expected position: Comcast is headquartered in Philadelphia and is one of the largest private employers in the greater Philadelphia region, including Delaware County communities in PA-05. Scanlon serves on the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over antitrust law — directly relevant to Comcast's market dominance in cable and internet services. Consumer broadband access and pricing in suburban Philadelphia communities are documented constituent concerns. A Judiciary Committee member representing constituents who are Comcast subscribers and employees would be expected to have a documented public record on Comcast's regulatory treatment. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Scanlon has been publicly active on antitrust and technology regulation issues generally through her Judiciary Committee work, issuing statements on Big Tech antitrust investigations and JCPA legislation. No documented specific public statement addresses Comcast's market position, broadband pricing, or merger review in the context of her district's constituents who are Comcast subscribers. Primary URL: https://scanlon.house.gov/media Days silent: 1460. The constituent is owed an explanation of the official's position.

Entities involved: Mary Gay Scanlon
Detected: 04 May 2026
Evidence last verified: —
Supporting evidence
No directly attached facts; this gap is derived from connections and structural patterns. See the methodology for how that works.
3 actions you can take
Contact the oversight body
Ask the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to hold a hearing
Target: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
▸ Preview the prefilled message
Subject: Constituent request: hearing on Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-0

Dear Members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,

I am writing to ask the committee to hold a public hearing on the following matter that falls within your jurisdiction: Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-0.

The basis of this request is documented in publicly available evidence summarised here: Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-05 constituents and Judiciary Committee jurisdiction.

Full evidence trail wi…
Open this action →
Tip a journalist
Send this to The Lever
Target: The Lever (David Sirota et al.)
▸ Preview the prefilled message
Subject: Tip — Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-05 constituents and Judiciary Committee jurisdiction

Hi The Lever team,

Tipping you to a documented accountability gap that aligns with your beat (Money in politics, regulatory capture):

Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-05 constituents and Judiciary Committee jurisdiction

One-line summary: Mary Gay Scanlon has not publicly weighed in on Comcast/NBCUniversal regulatory treatment and its intersection with PA-05 constituents and Judiciary Committee jurisdiction

Full evidence trail with source citations and confidence labels: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/disclo…
Open this action →
Support a watchdog
Support Campaign Legal Center, who has jurisdiction over this
Target: Campaign Legal Center
Open this action →
Read how the Oversight Wall derives gaps and what it deliberately does not do — methodology. If you are the subject of this gap or believe the underlying evidence is wrong, please use our corrections process.