[ Enter Database → ]
← The Oversight Wall
MED primary Enforcement Gap

No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett

Stacey E. Plaskett has 2 documented facts referencing violations, fines, settlements, or fraud, but no connection in the platform's graph documents an enforcement action, prosecution, sanction, or consent decree against them. This may indicate the platform's data is incomplete — or it may indicate a real enforcement gap. Either way, it's worth a closer look.

Entities involved: Stacey E. Plaskett
Detected: 04 May 2026
Evidence last verified: 03 May 2026
Supporting evidence
Plaskett personally solicited a $30,000 donation from Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse in fall 2018, years after his 2008 sex crime conviction was national news. The DCCC rejected Epstein's money because he failed vetting. She also sought and received $13,000 from Epstein for the Democratic Party of the US Virgin Islands.
Stacey E. Plaskett · primary · source ↗ · 03 May 2026
In June 2014, USVI first lady Cecile de Jongh emailed Epstein on Plaskett's behalf: 'Jeffrey, Your help is needed. We are trying to get Stacey Plaskett elected to Congress … we would have a friend in Stacey … Do you think any of your friends would give to her campaign?' At the time, de Jongh managed Epstein's USVI companies. Epstein had already pleaded guilty to sex crimes in 2008.
Stacey E. Plaskett · primary · source ↗ · 03 May 2026
3 actions you can take
File a FOIA
File a FOIA request with the U.S. Department of Justice — Criminal Division
Target: U.S. Department of Justice — Criminal Division
▸ Preview the prefilled message 
Subject: FOIA Request — All non-exempt records — including correspondence, internal memoranda, referrals

Dear FOIA Officer,

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, I request access to and copies of the following records held by the U.S. Department of Justice — Criminal Division:

All non-exempt records — including correspondence, internal memoranda, referrals, declination memos, and case-opening or case-closing documents — concerning any investigation, declined investigation, or referral involving "Stacey E. Plaskett" from January 2010 to the present.

I am requesting these records because: This request supports public-interest investigation of an oversight gap documented at …
Open this action →
Contact the oversight body
Ask the House Committee on Financial Services to hold a hearing
Target: House Committee on Financial Services
▸ Preview the prefilled message 
Subject: Constituent request: hearing on No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett

Dear Members of the House Committee on Financial Services,

I am writing to ask the committee to hold a public hearing on the following matter that falls within your jurisdiction: No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett.

The basis of this request is documented in publicly available evidence summarised here: No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett.

Full evidence trail with source citations: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/enforcement-gap-congress-p000610

This matter has not, to my knowledge, been the subject of a formal committee inquiry. The cited evidence consists of…
Open this action →
Tip a journalist
Send this to ProPublica
Target: ProPublica Tip Line
▸ Preview the prefilled message 
Subject: Tip — No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett

Hi ProPublica team,

Tipping you to a documented accountability gap that aligns with your beat (Investigative journalism, financial crime, government accountability):

No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett

One-line summary: No documented enforcement against Stacey E. Plaskett

Full evidence trail with source citations and confidence labels: https://goblinhouse.net/wall/enforcement-gap-congress-p000610

This is not original reporting — it's a structured map of public-record evidence (court filings, settlements, disclosures) compiled by Goblin House, an open investigative databas…
Open this action →
Read how the Oversight Wall derives gaps and what it deliberately does not do — methodology. If you are the subject of this gap or believe the underlying evidence is wrong, please use our corrections process.