Subramanyam's net worth estimate from Quiver Quantitative is $2.8 million as of May 2026, ranking 226th in Congress, according to the Quiver Quantitative congressional net‑worth tracker — a secondary source that aggregates primary financial disclosure data with editorial estimation.
inferential
· 2026-05-01
Subramanyam campaigned on a platform of 'campaign finance reform,' pledging to 'prevent members of Congress from trading individual stocks' and 'support legislation to reform our campaign finance laws to ensure middle‑class families are not drowned out by money that corrupts our elections.' Only 6.45 % of his $2.9 million in campaign funds came from small do
primary
· 2024-11-25
Protect Progress (FEC Committee ID C00848440) spent $1,813,504.61 in independent expenditures supporting Suhas Subramanyam's 2024 campaign, per FEC filing FEC‑1848045 (amended November 2024). This is approximately 17 times higher than the $106,947 figure currently in the portal's established facts. The expenditures were disbursed across multiple dates in May
primary
· 2024-05 to 2024-06
Stand With Crypto rates Subramanyam as 'Strongly supports crypto' with an 'A' grade, based on his GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act YEA votes and his overall pro‑crypto legislative positioning. He is one of 77 House Democrats to receive the 'A' grade.
primary
· 2025-07-17
Subramanyam also voted YEA on Roll Call 200 (S. 1582, GENIUS Act) on July 17, 2025. He was among 102 Democrats supporting the bill that passed 308‑122. Combined with his CLARITY Act vote, Subramanyam was 2‑for‑2 on crypto deregulation bills on the same legislative day.
primary
· 2025-07-17
Subramanyam voted YEA on Roll Call 199 (H.R. 3633, CLARITY Act) on July 17, 2025. The House Clerk's official record confirms 'Subramanyam | Democratic | VA | Yea' at line 386‑387. The vote passed 294‑134 with 216 GOP Yea, 77 Dem Yea, 1 GOP Nay, 134 Dem Nay. The prior 'yea_unverified' designation is superseded by primary evidence.
primary
· 2025-07-17
The identical collective‑bargaining‑restoration provision (Section 1110) had been stripped from the FY2026 NDAA (S. 1071) on December 10, 2025—one day before the H.R. 2550 vote—because Senate Republicans refused to include it in the bicameral compromise. Subramanyam voted Nay on the NDAA on December 10 and Aye on H.R. 2550 on December 11, demonstrating back‑
primary
· 2025-12-10
Trump's March 27, 2025 executive order excluded approximately 40 federal agencies and subdivisions from the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute, affecting workers at the departments of Defense, State, Veterans Affairs, Justice, Energy, and parts of Homeland Security, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Interior, and Agriculture. The National
primary
· 2025-03-27
H.R. 2550 reached the floor only through a discharge petition—a rare procedure requiring 218 signatures to force consideration over the opposition of GOP leadership. The discharge petition reached the threshold on November 17, 2025, led by a bipartisan group including Reps. Golden (D‑ME), Fitzpatrick (R‑PA), and Lawler (R‑NY). House Oversight Committee Chair
primary
· 2025-11-17
Subramanyam's official statement declared that Trump's executive order was 'another insult to thousands of our neighbors who are civil servants' and that the bill would 'ensure federal workers maintain their right to fight for competitive pay and benefits' and 'retain these hardworking employees who could be making more money in the private sector.' He concl
primary
· 2025-12-11
Subramanyam also voted Aye on H.Res. 432 (Roll Call 331), the rule providing for consideration of H.R. 2550, on December 11, 2025—the rule vote was the one flagged by the CWA as a key working‑family vote. Both votes are recorded in The Daily Record's member roll‑call archive.
primary
· 2025-12-11
Suhas Subramanyam voted Aye on H.R. 2550, the Protect America's Workforce Act, Roll Call 332, December 11, 2025—the bill passed 231–195 with 211 Democrats and 20 Republicans voting Aye, and 195 Republicans voting Nay.
primary
· 2025-12-11
Subramanyam's district (VA-10) hosts Northrop Grumman (2,500 employees) and Raytheon Technologies (2,500 employees), both of which benefit from the NDAA's authorization of defense spending. Subramanyam's Nay vote thus crossed the economic interests of these major employers, a tension he did not address in his statement.
secondary
· 2025-12-10
The CWA flagged H.Res. 936 (the NDAA rule) as a key working-family vote and records Subramanyam as voting 'No,' giving him a 'Right' mark. The rule was opposed by the AFL-CIO because it blocked the Norcross amendment that would have restored the collective bargaining protections stripped from the final bill.
primary
· 2025-12-10
Section 1110 (restoring collective bargaining rights for civilian DOD employees) was included in the September 2025 House-passed NDAA (H.R. 3838) but was stripped from the final bicameral compromise (S. 1071). The AFL-CIO supported the September bill but opposed the December rule and final bill because of this removal. Subramanyam voted Nay on the December r
primary
· 2025-12-10
Subramanyam's official statement cited 'divisive, extreme social-policy riders that target reproductive rights, transgender Americans, and diversity and inclusion programs,' plus his opposition to giving Donald Trump 'a blank check to deploy our service members without congressional approval,' as his reasons for voting Nay. He made no explicit mention of Sec
primary
· 2025-12-10
The bill number cited in the original claim (H.R. 5371) is incorrect. The correct bill number for the final NDAA is S. 1071. The earlier House-passed version was H.R. 3838. H.R. 5371 does not correspond to any NDAA-related measure in the 119th Congress.
primary
· 2025-12-10
Suhas Subramanyam voted Nay on the final passage of S. 1071 (the bicameral compromise FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act) on December 10, 2025, which passed 312–112. He was among 90 Democrats and 22 Republicans who opposed the bill.
primary
· 2025-12-10
Nevada has 15.1% SNAP participation—the ninth highest rate among all states—with approximately 495,800 recipients statewide and an estimated 27,700 Nevadans projected to lose benefits due to new work requirements taking effect May 1, 2026 under the OBBB cuts that H.R. 7567 codified.
primary
· 2026-04-28
Horsford voted FOR the 2014 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642), which passed 251-166, telling the Las Vegas Sun that PILT 'dollars pay for education, law enforcement, infrastructure and other vital social services' in rural Nevada. His 2026 Nay represents a 12-year reversal, almost certainly driven by the $187 billion in SNAP cuts absent from the 2014 bill.
primary
· 2014-01-29
GOBLIN HOUSE
[ Enter Database → ]