[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Suhas Subramanyam

Suhas Subramanyam

Democratic · Representative, VA ·10

Suhas Subramanyam is the Democratic U.S. Representative (VA's 10th congressional district). The platform has 5 voting records on file (2025) and 68 verified facts on file covering this member's voting positions, financial disclosures, and stated platform commitments.

Score Components
58 MODERATE
Connection Density 20%
73 → 15
Donor Influence 15%
30 → 5
Silence Risk 25%
31 → 8
Contradiction Risk 25%
69 → 17
Intelligence Volume 15%
82 → 12
Constituency Deviation 0%
67 → 0
Voting Misalignment 0%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
Subramanyam's net worth estimate from Quiver Quantitative is $2.8 million as of May 2026, ranking 226th in Congress, according to the Quiver Quantitative congressional net‑worth tracker — a secondary source that aggregates primary financial disclosure data with editorial estimation.
inferential · 2026-05-01 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam campaigned on a platform of 'campaign finance reform,' pledging to 'prevent members of Congress from trading individual stocks' and 'support legislation to reform our campaign finance laws to ensure middle‑class families are not drowned out by money that corrupts our elections.' Only 6.45 % of his $2.9 million in campaign funds came from small donors under $200.
primary · 2024-11-25 ✓ Verified
Protect Progress (FEC Committee ID C00848440) spent $1,813,504.61 in independent expenditures supporting Suhas Subramanyam's 2024 campaign, per FEC filing FEC‑1848045 (amended November 2024). This is approximately 17 times higher than the $106,947 figure currently in the portal's established facts. The expenditures were disbursed across multiple dates in May–June 2024 and covered digital advertising, direct mail…
[ Show full fact ]
Protect Progress (FEC Committee ID C00848440) spent $1,813,504.61 in independent expenditures supporting Suhas Subramanyam's 2024 campaign, per FEC filing FEC‑1848045 (amended November 2024). This is approximately 17 times higher than the $106,947 figure currently in the portal's established facts. The expenditures were disbursed across multiple dates in May–June 2024 and covered digital advertising, direct mail, and voter contact.
primary · 2024-05 to 2024-06 ✓ Verified
Stand With Crypto rates Subramanyam as 'Strongly supports crypto' with an 'A' grade, based on his GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act YEA votes and his overall pro‑crypto legislative positioning. He is one of 77 House Democrats to receive the 'A' grade.
primary · 2025-07-17 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam also voted YEA on Roll Call 200 (S. 1582, GENIUS Act) on July 17, 2025. He was among 102 Democrats supporting the bill that passed 308‑122. Combined with his CLARITY Act vote, Subramanyam was 2‑for‑2 on crypto deregulation bills on the same legislative day.
primary · 2025-07-17 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam voted YEA on Roll Call 199 (H.R. 3633, CLARITY Act) on July 17, 2025. The House Clerk's official record confirms 'Subramanyam | Democratic | VA | Yea' at line 386‑387. The vote passed 294‑134 with 216 GOP Yea, 77 Dem Yea, 1 GOP Nay, 134 Dem Nay. The prior 'yea_unverified' designation is superseded by primary evidence.
primary · 2025-07-17 ✓ Verified
The identical collective‑bargaining‑restoration provision (Section 1110) had been stripped from the FY2026 NDAA (S. 1071) on December 10, 2025—one day before the H.R. 2550 vote—because Senate Republicans refused to include it in the bicameral compromise. Subramanyam voted Nay on the NDAA on December 10 and Aye on H.R. 2550 on December 11, demonstrating back‑to‑back labor consistency.
primary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
Trump's March 27, 2025 executive order excluded approximately 40 federal agencies and subdivisions from the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute, affecting workers at the departments of Defense, State, Veterans Affairs, Justice, Energy, and parts of Homeland Security, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Interior, and Agriculture. The National Treasury Employees Union described it as 'of unprecedented…
[ Show full fact ]
Trump's March 27, 2025 executive order excluded approximately 40 federal agencies and subdivisions from the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute, affecting workers at the departments of Defense, State, Veterans Affairs, Justice, Energy, and parts of Homeland Security, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Interior, and Agriculture. The National Treasury Employees Union described it as 'of unprecedented scope' covering 'some two‑thirds of the federal workforce.'
primary · 2025-03-27 ✓ Verified
H.R. 2550 reached the floor only through a discharge petition—a rare procedure requiring 218 signatures to force consideration over the opposition of GOP leadership. The discharge petition reached the threshold on November 17, 2025, led by a bipartisan group including Reps. Golden (D‑ME), Fitzpatrick (R‑PA), and Lawler (R‑NY). House Oversight Committee Chairman Comer (R‑KY) formally opposed the bill.
primary · 2025-11-17 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam's official statement declared that Trump's executive order was 'another insult to thousands of our neighbors who are civil servants' and that the bill would 'ensure federal workers maintain their right to fight for competitive pay and benefits' and 'retain these hardworking employees who could be making more money in the private sector.' He concluded: 'The Senate must pass this bill as soon as possible…
[ Show full fact ]
Subramanyam's official statement declared that Trump's executive order was 'another insult to thousands of our neighbors who are civil servants' and that the bill would 'ensure federal workers maintain their right to fight for competitive pay and benefits' and 'retain these hardworking employees who could be making more money in the private sector.' He concluded: 'The Senate must pass this bill as soon as possible to restore workers' rights to thousands of federal employees.'
primary · 2025-12-11 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam also voted Aye on H.Res. 432 (Roll Call 331), the rule providing for consideration of H.R. 2550, on December 11, 2025—the rule vote was the one flagged by the CWA as a key working‑family vote. Both votes are recorded in The Daily Record's member roll‑call archive.
primary · 2025-12-11 ✓ Verified
Suhas Subramanyam voted Aye on H.R. 2550, the Protect America's Workforce Act, Roll Call 332, December 11, 2025—the bill passed 231–195 with 211 Democrats and 20 Republicans voting Aye, and 195 Republicans voting Nay.
primary · 2025-12-11 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam's district (VA-10) hosts Northrop Grumman (2,500 employees) and Raytheon Technologies (2,500 employees), both of which benefit from the NDAA's authorization of defense spending. Subramanyam's Nay vote thus crossed the economic interests of these major employers, a tension he did not address in his statement.
secondary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
The CWA flagged H.Res. 936 (the NDAA rule) as a key working-family vote and records Subramanyam as voting 'No,' giving him a 'Right' mark. The rule was opposed by the AFL-CIO because it blocked the Norcross amendment that would have restored the collective bargaining protections stripped from the final bill.
primary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
Section 1110 (restoring collective bargaining rights for civilian DOD employees) was included in the September 2025 House-passed NDAA (H.R. 3838) but was stripped from the final bicameral compromise (S. 1071). The AFL-CIO supported the September bill but opposed the December rule and final bill because of this removal. Subramanyam voted Nay on the December rule (H.Res. 936) and final passage, aligning with the…
[ Show full fact ]
Section 1110 (restoring collective bargaining rights for civilian DOD employees) was included in the September 2025 House-passed NDAA (H.R. 3838) but was stripped from the final bicameral compromise (S. 1071). The AFL-CIO supported the September bill but opposed the December rule and final bill because of this removal. Subramanyam voted Nay on the December rule (H.Res. 936) and final passage, aligning with the AFL-CIO's evolving recommendation.
primary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
Subramanyam's official statement cited 'divisive, extreme social-policy riders that target reproductive rights, transgender Americans, and diversity and inclusion programs,' plus his opposition to giving Donald Trump 'a blank check to deploy our service members without congressional approval,' as his reasons for voting Nay. He made no explicit mention of Section 1110 or the collective bargaining provision.
primary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
The bill number cited in the original claim (H.R. 5371) is incorrect. The correct bill number for the final NDAA is S. 1071. The earlier House-passed version was H.R. 3838. H.R. 5371 does not correspond to any NDAA-related measure in the 119th Congress.
primary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
Suhas Subramanyam voted Nay on the final passage of S. 1071 (the bicameral compromise FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act) on December 10, 2025, which passed 312–112. He was among 90 Democrats and 22 Republicans who opposed the bill.
primary · 2025-12-10 ✓ Verified
Nevada has 15.1% SNAP participation—the ninth highest rate among all states—with approximately 495,800 recipients statewide and an estimated 27,700 Nevadans projected to lose benefits due to new work requirements taking effect May 1, 2026 under the OBBB cuts that H.R. 7567 codified.
primary · 2026-04-28 ✓ Verified
Horsford voted FOR the 2014 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642), which passed 251-166, telling the Las Vegas Sun that PILT 'dollars pay for education, law enforcement, infrastructure and other vital social services' in rural Nevada. His 2026 Nay represents a 12-year reversal, almost certainly driven by the $187 billion in SNAP cuts absent from the 2014 bill.
primary · 2014-01-29 ✓ Verified
Quiver Quantitative financial_data_source Quiver Quantitative estimates Subramanyam's net worth at approximately $2.8 million as of May 2026, ranking 226th highest in Congress.
Protect Progress independent_expenditure_support Protect Progress, a super PAC affiliated with Fairshake PAC (crypto industry), spent $106,947 in independent expenditures supporting Subramanyam's general…
Steven Horsford fellow_congressional_voter The Subramanyam facts block includes contextual information about Steven Horsford's votes and SNAP advocacy, but no direct connection between the two…
GENIUS Act legislation_voted_for Subramanyam voted for the GENIUS Act, described as 'very pro-crypto.'
CLARITY Act legislation_voted_for Subramanyam voted for the CLARITY Act, described as 'very pro-crypto.'
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) opposition_target Subramanyam voted against the GOP continuing resolution, saying it would give DOGE a 'blank check to engage in unrestrained corruption.' He introduced the…
Stand With Crypto Alliance advocacy_rating Stand With Crypto rated Subramanyam 'strongly supportive' of cryptocurrency legislation, and he completed their questionnaire demonstrating support for…
Fairshake affiliation Protect Progress, which supported Subramanyam, is a super PAC affiliated with Fairshake PAC (crypto industry).
Common Good USA donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00829069/
Democracy Defense Fund donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00811786/
Fight The Right PAC donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00775205/
Defend The Vote donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00764233/
Hindus Of Georgia PAC donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00756205/
Baps Public Affairs, Inc. PAC (Baps PAC) donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00753475/
Ttm Technologies Inc PAC donor $7,500 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2026 cycle (3 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00752766/
Americans4hindus PAC (Multi-Candidate) donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00729574/
Indian American Impact Fund donor $10,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00674127/
Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00617803/
Fair Shot PAC donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (1 contribution), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00574970/
Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC) donor $5,000 to Suhas Subramanyam's principal committee in the 2024 cycle (2 contributions), FEC Schedule A line 11C. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00573709/
BillVoteDateAlignment
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Water Resources Development Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Ratepayer Protection Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
PROOF Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Retire through Ownership Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
GUARD Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes… Present 2026-09-15 unknown
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Whistleblower Protection Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act Nay 2026-09-03 unknown
Protecting Domestic Mining Act Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require… Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
AGOA Extension Act Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act Yea 2026-08-31 unknown
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 90/100
Platform: "At an April 13, 2025 town hall in Fairfax County, Subramanyam was asked about taking money from AIPAC. He replied: 'I have zero money taken from…AIPAC has not sent me any money…I have gotten far more money from people…
[ Show full platform position ]
At an April 13, 2025 town hall in Fairfax County, Subramanyam was asked about taking money from AIPAC. He replied: 'I have zero money taken from…AIPAC has not sent me any money…I have gotten far more money from people who oppose Israel. My vote is not bought in any sort of way.'
"
Vote: on "FEC campaign finance records compiled by OpenSecrets show American Israel Public Affairs Cmte as…"
Subramanyam told constituents at a town hall that he took 'zero money' from AIPAC and 'AIPAC has not sent me any money,' but FEC records show AIPAC was his top donor at $37,250 including $5,000 directly from AIPAC's PAC. AIPAC Tracker fact-checked and contradicted his denial. His defense that he received 'far more…
[ Show full analysis ]
Subramanyam told constituents at a town hall that he took 'zero money' from AIPAC and 'AIPAC has not sent me any money,' but FEC records show AIPAC was his top donor at $37,250 including $5,000 directly from AIPAC's PAC. AIPAC Tracker fact-checked and contradicted his denial. His defense that he received 'far more money from people who oppose Israel' does not negate the discrepancy.
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "Subramanyam campaigned on 'campaign finance reform' and pledged to 'prevent members of Congress from trading individual stocks' and be 'a strong advocate for preventing corruption in politics.' He stated he would…
[ Show full platform position ]
Subramanyam campaigned on 'campaign finance reform' and pledged to 'prevent members of Congress from trading individual stocks' and be 'a strong advocate for preventing corruption in politics.' He stated he would 'support legislation to reform our campaign finance laws to ensure middle-class families are not drowned out by money that corrupts our elections.'
"
Vote: on "Only 6.45% of Subramanyam's $2.9 million in campaign funds came from small donors under $200…"
Subramanyam campaigned on reforming a campaign finance system corrupted by big money, yet his own fundraising relied overwhelmingly on large donors (74.19% of funds) and super PAC support ($691,412), with only 6.45% from small-dollar grassroots donors — mirroring the very system he pledged to reform.
Last silence detection: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:16:58 GMT (via scheduled run)
other / unclassified
Backpac, Aspire PAC, Hindu American Political Action Committee, Americans4hindus PAC (Multi-Candidate), Hindus Of Georgia PAC, Fight The Right PAC, Common Good USA, Indian American Impact Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Backpac, Aspire PAC, Hindu American Political Action Committee, Americans4hindus PAC (Multi-Candidate), Hindus Of Georgia PAC, Fight The Right PAC, Common Good USA, Indian American Impact Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
colleagues' leadership pacs
PAC To The Future, Forward Together PAC, Blue Hen Federal PAC, Commonwealth PAC, Common Ground PAC, Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC), Fair Shot PAC, Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
PAC To The Future, Forward Together PAC, Blue Hen Federal PAC, Commonwealth PAC, Common Ground PAC, Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC), Fair Shot PAC, Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $6,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
party committees
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: party committees
ideological & single-issue
Defend The Vote (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC (Nbwa PAC) Alcohol & tobacco $5,000 (2024)
Common Good USA Other / unclassified $5,000 (2024)
Democracy Defense Fund Defense & aerospace $5,000 (2024)
Fight The Right PAC Other / unclassified $5,000 (2024)
Defend The Vote Ideological & single-issue $5,000 (2026)
Hindus Of Georgia PAC Other / unclassified $5,000 (2024)
Baps Public Affairs, Inc. PAC (Baps PAC) Law & lobbying firms $5,000 (2026)
Ttm Technologies Inc PAC Technology $7,500 (2026)
Americans4hindus PAC (Multi-Candidate) Other / unclassified $5,000 (2026)
Indian American Impact Fund Other / unclassified $5,000 (2026)
Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
Fair Shot PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC) Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
Common Ground PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $10,000 (2026)
Hindu American Political Action Committee Other / unclassified $5,000 (2026)
TopicPriorityAlignmentDeviation
Campaign Finance & Stock Trading Reform 66 15 80
Data Centers, Energy Grid & Land Use 88 20 75
Transportation, I-66/I-95 Congestion & Infrastructure 78 35 50
Cryptocurrency & Digital Asset Regulation 45 50 45
Immigration & Skilled Visa Policy 74 50 40
Education & Public Schools Funding 70 40 40
Government Shutdown / Continuing Resolution Politics 80 70 30
Healthcare Costs & Prescription Drug Pricing 82 65 25
Defense & National Security Spending 72 55 25
Climate, Environment & Clean Energy 68 60 20
Federal Budget, Medicaid & Safety Net 84 90 10
Federal Workforce & Collective Bargaining 92 95 5
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Contradiction Risk30%Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence20%Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk15%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume15%Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation0%Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment0%Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]
Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains, while 1 elected official holds documented connections.
$3.0BDonor Contributions
0Money Chains
0Traced Hops
Connected Officials
Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

View Full Entity Profile →