Recent events
2026-04-24
Other facts
SECONDARY
The DEF 14A proxy statement filed by Palantir on 2026-04-24 is the first SEC filing to mention 'ImmigrationOS' by name, meaning Palantir did not disclose this product name in any earlier 10-K or 10-Q filings since the…
2025-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
The absence of 'ImmigrationOS' from court records is a function of legal naming conventions rather than evidence of the platform's non-controversial status; substantive challenges would appear under Palantir's…
2025-06-15
Transactions
SECONDARY
The $30M ImmigrationOS no-bid contract’s classification as a modification or add-on to an existing ICM umbrella contract would determine whether it is separately visible in USASpending or consolidated under a parent…
2025-06-10
Transactions
PRIMARY
ImmigrationOS is built directly on top of existing ICM (Investigative Case Management) infrastructure as an enhancement rather than standalone system
2025-04-17
Other facts
PRIMARY
ImmigrationOS is designed for three functions: identify targets for removal, track self-deportations in near real-time, and improve deportation logistics efficiency
2025-04-01
Transactions
PRIMARY
Palantir received a $30 million contract from ICE in April to build ImmigrationOS database to track undocumented people across federal agencies
2024-06-15
Transactions
INFERENTIAL
FEC database architecture indexes political contributions by legal entity names and individual surnames, making surveillance product brands systematically invisible even when their parent companies engage in…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Federal court challenges to government surveillance technology follow two distinct patterns: contract disputes naming the vendor corporation as defendant, and constitutional challenges naming the government agency as…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The systematic absence of proprietary government surveillance product names from public contract databases creates a methodological blind spot that may be intentionally exploited to reduce accountability scrutiny
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The inferential claim demonstrates how product-name-based accountability research creates false negatives in government surveillance oversight, as federal procurement systems are designed to track corporate vendors…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The structural methodology gap between product-specific accountability research and campaign finance transparency creates systematic blind spots in public oversight of government surveillance technology political…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The inferential claim about entity name confusion has been definitively resolved: ImmigrationOS operates under its parent company Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE: PLTR), not as a separate legal entity, making it…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The inferential claim about ImmigrationOS operating as a private company exempt from SEC requirements has been definitively resolved as incorrect - it is a Palantir Technologies product subject to full public company…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The inferential claim demonstrates a critical gap in surveillance technology accountability research methodology: treating proprietary government platform names as independent political actors rather than products…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The systematic confusion between product names and corporate legal entities in government surveillance technology creates structural gaps in public accountability research methodology
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Government surveillance product accountability requires searching corporate legal entities as defendants rather than proprietary platform names, as enforcement actions target companies, not branded products
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The inferential claim contains a fundamental jurisdictional error: UK Parliamentary oversight cannot extend to US federal agency contracts with Palantir/ICE, making any claimed parliamentary scrutiny of US…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Legitimate parliamentary scrutiny of Palantir's UK operations would reference 'Palantir Technologies UK Limited' or broader Home Office digitalization programs, not proprietary US product names like 'ImmigrationOS'
2024-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
ImmigrationOS is a product/platform name, not an independent corporate entity, and therefore would not have standalone SEC filings separate from its developer Palantir Technologies Inc.
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The systematic absence of 'ImmigrationOS' from direct keyword searches across all major public databases confirms the established pattern where proprietary government surveillance platforms are systematically invisible…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The verification methodology identified in this claim represents the standard process required for confirming any proprietary government surveillance product contract details due to systematic database architecture…
2024-06-15
Transactions
SECONDARY
The ImmigrationOS naming collision creates a measurable case study for investigating whether surveillance contractors deliberately exploit accountability research methodology gaps through strategic product branding…
2024-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
No federal court complaint naming Palantir as defendant or third-party defendant in an immigration detention case between 2017 and 2024 uses the specific product name 'ImmigrationOS,' 'ELITE,' or 'Immigration Lifecycle…
2024-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The systematic confusion in public accountability research caused by this naming collision may constitute a form of inadvertent 'security through obscurity' for government surveillance programs
2024-06-15
Transactions
INFERENTIAL
The ImmigrationOS case establishes a methodology template for investigating any proprietary government surveillance product: corporate vendor verification, FOIA requests for product specifications, and trademark…
+74 earlier events on the chart
