Trump argues executive privilege protects an outgoing president's documents — claims absolute presidential immunity for the same acts as candidate
CASE A
United States v. Trump (1:23-cr-00257-TSC, Mar-a-Lago documents case parallel)
An outgoing president retains absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for any official act, including the retention of classified national-defense information after leaving office. Executive privilege survives the end of the term; the Presidential Records Act doesn't override it.Source ↗
CASE B
Trump v. Thompson (No. 21-cv-2769; January 6 committee documents)
As a former president, Trump asserted executive privilege to block the National Archives from releasing his administration's records to the January 6 select committee — arguing the sitting president (Biden) could not waive his predecessor's privilege.Source ↗
// THE PARADOX
In Trump v. Thompson, Trump's position was that executive privilege over presidential records is an enduring protection that a successor cannot waive. In the SCOTUS immunity case, the same privilege framework was extended to argue that retaining and refusing to return those records is itself an immune official act. The two positions combine into a structurally circular claim: the privilege both prevents disclosure AND immunizes the refusal to return the same documents. A protection asserted for one purpose (shielding documents) became a sword for a second purpose (immunizing retention).