Structural cluster comparison · Mary E. Miller

Cluster comparison

Side-by-side view of Mary E. Miller's 6-axis behavioral signature against the 3 most structurally-similar tracked entities. Similarity is computed by cosine distance over the metric vector — entities sharing a row do not share a connection, only a behavioral shape.

Methodology — read this first. Cluster membership is a structural observation about documented behavior, never a claim of social affinity, coordination, or shared intent. Two entities can share a behavioral cluster without ever having interacted. The platform does not infer motive or internal state.

Axis	Mary E. Miller this entity	Curtis Yarvin 99.8% similarity	Stephen Miller 99.7% similarity	Matt Danzeisen 99.6% similarity
Documentation Density	83 (152 facts)	100 (866 facts)	100 (703 facts)	84 (165 facts)
Conduct Contradiction	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)
Inferential Dependency	75 (114/152)	83 (720/866)	80 (559/703)	61 (101/165)
Network Centrality	66 (21 conn)	70 (26 conn)	67 (22 conn)	62 (17 conn)
Capital Flow Asymmetry	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)
Structural Density	2 (1 findings)	0 (1 findings)	1 (2 findings)	2 (1 findings)

Comparison derived from the same Signature data each entity's /conduct-profile/<slug>/signature page uses. JSON export at /signature.json.