Structural cluster comparison · Tim Moore

Cluster comparison

Side-by-side view of Tim Moore's 6-axis behavioral signature against the 3 most structurally-similar tracked entities. Similarity is computed by cosine distance over the metric vector — entities sharing a row do not share a connection, only a behavioral shape.

Methodology — read this first. Cluster membership is a structural observation about documented behavior, never a claim of social affinity, coordination, or shared intent. Two entities can share a behavioral cluster without ever having interacted. The platform does not infer motive or internal state.

Axis	Tim Moore this entity	Mike Ezell 99.9% similarity	David J. Taylor 99.9% similarity	Robert Garcia 99.8% similarity
Documentation Density	70 (68 facts)	73 (85 facts)	68 (60 facts)	68 (60 facts)
Conduct Contradiction	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)
Inferential Dependency	10 (7/68)	7 (6/85)	8 (5/60)	7 (4/60)
Network Centrality	85 (50 conn)	92 (68 conn)	82 (48 conn)	93 (71 conn)
Capital Flow Asymmetry	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)
Structural Density	4 (1 findings)	4 (1 findings)	10 (2 findings)	5 (1 findings)

Comparison derived from the same Signature data each entity's /conduct-profile/<slug>/signature page uses. JSON export at /signature.json.