Structural cluster comparison · John H. Rutherford

Cluster comparison

Side-by-side view of John H. Rutherford's 6-axis behavioral signature against the 3 most structurally-similar tracked entities. Similarity is computed by cosine distance over the metric vector — entities sharing a row do not share a connection, only a behavioral shape.

Methodology — read this first. Cluster membership is a structural observation about documented behavior, never a claim of social affinity, coordination, or shared intent. Two entities can share a behavioral cluster without ever having interacted. The platform does not infer motive or internal state.

Axis	John H. Rutherford this entity	Sarah Elfreth 99.9% similarity	Pat Harrigan 99.9% similarity	Troy E. Nehls 99.9% similarity
Documentation Density	70 (71 facts)	70 (70 facts)	73 (83 facts)	71 (75 facts)
Conduct Contradiction	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)	0 (0/0)
Inferential Dependency	54 (38/71)	57 (40/70)	48 (40/83)	48 (36/75)
Network Centrality	91 (66 conn)	89 (59 conn)	88 (58 conn)	88 (57 conn)
Capital Flow Asymmetry	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)	50 ($0.0M in)
Structural Density	8 (2 findings)	4 (1 findings)	7 (2 findings)	4 (1 findings)

Comparison derived from the same Signature data each entity's /conduct-profile/<slug>/signature page uses. JSON export at /signature.json.