[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Mark DeSaulnier

Mark DeSaulnier

Democratic · Representative, CA ·10
Score Components
5 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 10%
52 → 5
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Cook Partisan Voting Index: D+33
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: unemployment rate: 5.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median rent: $2,658
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median property value: $1,029,400
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 18.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Asian (Non-Hispanic) population share: 22.9%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median age: 41.1
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: bachelor's degree or higher: 55.5% (22.8% post-graduate)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: homeownership rate: 71.7%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: poverty rate: 4.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: median household income: $153,525
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: population: 760,299
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 36 — Homelessness, Drug Addiction and Theft Reduction Act (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 68.4% Yes — 31.6% No
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Proposition 1 — Behavioral Health Services and Bond Measure (2024) (2024) — passed, margin 50.2% Yes — 49.8% No
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.11)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 (share 0.13)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.15)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: PBF Energy / Martinez Refinery (1200 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: John Muir Health (Walnut Creek / Concord) (7000 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Chevron Corporation (San Ramon HQ) (5000 employees)
secondary
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (March 2026) nay 2026-03-27 aligned
Iran War Powers Resolution (March 2026) yea 2026-03-05 deviating
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — House final passage, July 2025 nay 2025-07-03 aligned
Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas (March 2025) nay 2025-03-06 deviating
Laken Riley Act (119th Congress, January 2025) nay 2025-01-07 aligned
SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, July 2024) nay 2024-07-10 aligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($61 billion aid) yea 2024-04-20 aligned
Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($26 billion military aid) nay 2024-04-20 deviating
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →