[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS

// Legislative Integrity Monitor

Goblin House Intelligence

Ronny Jackson

Republican · Representative, TX ·13

Score Components

31 ELEVATED

Connection Density 20%

0 → 0

Donor Influence 10%

0 → 0

Silence Risk 25%

20 → 5

Contradiction Risk 25%

82 → 21

Intelligence Volume 10%

56 → 6

Constituency Deviation 5%

0 → 0

Voting Misalignment 5%

0 → 0

% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Non-English language at home: 21% of households (Spanish: 126,900; Vietnamese: 3,493; Chinese: 2,483)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Gulf War-era veterans: 14,831 (largest veteran cohort)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median age: 35.9

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment rate: 3.9%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Foreign-born population: 10.2% (79.6k)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: U.S. citizenship rate: 93.6%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Hispanic population share: 28.9% (226k)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: White (Non-Hispanic) population share: 67.2% (452k)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Population: 782,513 (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median rent: $1,118

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median property value: $192,600

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's degree or higher: 26.2%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 64.2%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 10.3% (ACS 5-Year); 14.6% (Data USA 2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $68,442 (2024)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Texas Proposition 1 — Property Tax Reduction (2023) (2023) — passed, margin approved by voters

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Texas Proposition 6 — Water Infrastructure Fund (2023) (2023) — passed, margin 77.5% to 22.5%

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 11 - Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (livestock, cotton, wheat) (share 0.047)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 61 - Educational Services (share 0.108)

secondary

[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 - Retail Trade (share 0.117)

secondary

No connections mapped

Bill	Vote	Date	Alignment
Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (Farm Bill) — On Passage	yea	2026-04-30	mixed
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026	yea	2026-04-29	mixed
Proposing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution	yea	2026-03-18	mixed
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026 — Ending the 43-Day Governmen	yea	2025-11-12	aligned
One Big Beautiful Bill Act — On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment and Fin	yea	2025-07-03	misaligned
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act — On Passage	yea	2025-04-10	mixed
Laken Riley Act — On Passage	yea	2025-01-07	aligned
Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 ($60.8 billion)	nay	2024-04-20	deviating
NDAA Votes Including Jackson Amendment to Prohibit DOD from Paying for Abortion	yea	2023-07-15	mixed

Last contradiction analysis: Never

platform_vs_vote 90/100

Platform: "Jackson co-sponsored H.J. Res. 2, a Balanced Budget Amendment that would constitutionally require the federal government to balance its budget. His iV"

Vote: on "On July 3, 2025, Jackson voted Yea on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), calling it 'a MAJOR W"

Jackson co-sponsored a Balanced Budget Amendment to constitutionally require balanced federal budgets — calling it essential to 'guarantee Social Security' and 'control wasteful spending' — then voted for the OBBB, which the CBO projected would add $

same_source_inconsistency 30/100

Platform: "In October 2021, Jackson tweeted: 'I WILL NOT be voting for Pelosi's bloated infrastructure bill, which spits in the face of the Patriotic values my c"

Vote: on "In February 2022, Jackson issued a press release and sent a constituent email touting his 'instrumen"

[auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Jackson condemned the infrastructure bill as 'TERRIBLE' and a spit 'in the face of the Patriotic values my constituents expect,' then claimed an 'instrumental' role in securing water proje

same_source_inconsistency 30/100

Platform: "Jackson served as White House physician and repeatedly vouched for Donald Trump's 'excellent health' and 'incredibly good genes' during a lengthy 2018"

Vote: on "A Pentagon Inspector General report — based on interviews with 78 witnesses — found Jackson 'dispara"

Jackson presented himself as an objective medical professional vouching for Trump's health, while a Pentagon IG investigation based on 78 witness interviews found he created a 'negative work environment' through bullying and sexual comments. Both the

Last silence detection: Never

In-person town halls and direct constituent accessibility in TX-13

1943d silent

Expected position: As the representative of a 782,513-constituent district spanning the Texas Panhandle with a 14.6% poverty rate and significant rural healthcare challenges, Jackson would be expected

Oath Keepers extremist group discussing protecting Jackson during January 6 Capitol riot — what 'critical data' he possessed

13d silent

Expected position: As a member of Congress who was identified by a seditious conspiracy group as needing 'protection' during a violent attack on the Capitol — because he 'has critical data to protect'

No donor interests mapped

No constituency baseline modelled

No platform commitments archived

No committee memberships recorded

Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

Component	Weight	Signal
Silence Risk	25%	Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk	25%	Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density	20%	Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume	10%	Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence	10%	Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation	5%	Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment	5%	Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →