[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Morgan Luttrell

Morgan Luttrell

Republican · Representative, TX ·8
Score Components
4 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 10%
38 → 4
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: 2023 estimated population: Approximately 950,000
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: District composition: Parts of Montgomery, Walker, Harris counties; all of San Jacinto and Polk counties
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 22 (share 0.05)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 21 (share 0.08)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 11 (share 0.12)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Huntsville Independent School District (1200 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Lone Star College System (1800 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Montgomery County Hospital District (2500 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Texas's 8th Congressional District encompasses parts of Montgomery, Walker, and Harris counties, and all of San Jacinto and Polk counties in East Texas. The district is a mix of suburban areas in the northern Houston exurbs (Montgomery County), rural timber and agricultural land (San Jacinto, Polk), and growing commu
secondary
Voted yea on H.R. 7567 (Farm, Food, and National Security Act) on 2026-04-30: Voted Yea on final passage of the Farm Bill after voting Nay on an earlier version (Roll 153). Texas 8th district includes significant agricultural areas in San Jacinto and Polk counties, making farm policy materially important to constituents. The reversal between votes suggests c
primary · 2026-04-30
Voted nay on S. 4465 (To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) on 2026-04-30: Luttrell voted against extending FISA Section 702 surveillance authorities, a position that may align with civil liberties advocates but could be at odds with his Armed Services Committee r
primary · 2026-04-30
Morgan Luttrell's principal campaign committee is Texans for Morgan Luttrell, FEC ID C00781112, based in Magnolia, Texas
primary · 2023-01-03
FEC Form 3X filing for Texans for Morgan Luttrell covering 01/01/2026 through 03/31/2026 shows net contributions of -$1,000 for the period due to $1,000 in contribution refunds
primary · 2026-04-14
Texans for Morgan Luttrell (C00781112) reported total contributions of $347,339.78 and net contributions of $332,339.78 for the 2025-2026 election cycle through Q1 2026, with $396,904.88 cash on hand as of 03/31/2026
primary · 2026-03-31
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII nay 2026-04-30 mixed
Farm, Food, and National Security Act yea 2026-04-30 misaligned
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →